Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…2324262829…175

Comments

  • Options
    ChunesChunes
    "It seems as if someone's just popped in wearing a Panama hat."   :D
  • Options
    swords_aliveswords_alive


    Matt Southall has just announced in the public chatroom that he is present at today's hearing.
  • Options
    ProperCharltonProperCharlton
    I've got a bad feeling about this. Think Elliott is on to a winner.
  • Options
    mattinfinlandmattinfinland
    Elliot is going to win this, can see it already 
    this is gonna drag on and on.
    This Lawyer is V-good.

    ffs
  • Options
    ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Elliott has appealed the EFL decision to reject him under OADT.
  • Options
    carly burncarly burn
    Someone on a tractor enters proceedings!
  • Options
    ElfsborgAddickElfsborgAddick
    Fumbluff said:
    Leeds_Addick said:
    How strict are these things with timings usually? Can we do 3-5 now or will the judge have to be somewhere at 4?

    he’s got 4-430 pencilled in as helping @ElfsborgAddick with his poo-spoon...
    He'll need more than 30 minutes.
  • Options
    golfaddickgolfaddick
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says contract to sell is signed and not in dispute. Drag along provisions re Southall activated in May.
    not in dispute by whom ?  Nimer or Elliott.

    All the rest is just guff. The main issue is does Elliott have a signed  agreement tat says he has the exclusive right to buy.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    BansteadAddickBansteadAddick
    edited September 2020
    The whole thing seems so stupid. Elliott has no funds, will not lift the embargo and cannot run the club. Nimer has no funds, will not lift the embargo and cannot run the club. 
  • Options
    LordflashheartLordflashheart
    Surely it all hinges on the paperwork signed between ESI 1 and ESI 2 - all other wind and guff being spouted is irrelevant 
  • Options
    RedroboRedrobo
    Whenever a lawyer is talking it seems to be all clear cut, then the other one starts and you think they are right. 
  • Options
    guinnessaddickguinnessaddick
    Chunes said:
    "It seems as if someone's just popped in wearing a Panama hat."   :D
    Masons.
  • Options
    JintsJints
    Richard J said:
    Hearings always sound as though their side has a strong case. That is why Barristers are paid the big bucks. 
    Absolutely. Impossible to take a view on basis of just hearing one side. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    FumbluffFumbluff
    How do people still have mics and cameras on....good grief
  • Options
    i_b_b_o_r_gi_b_b_o_r_g
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Confirms that Elliott has submitted an appeal in relation to his disqualification by the EFL. Chaisty says Farnell’s role should be disregarded for the moment.
    For the moment, but reckon LK might bring it up
  • Options
    RedroboRedrobo
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Confirms that Elliott has submitted an appeal in relation to his disqualification by the EFL. Chaisty says Farnell’s role should be disregarded for the moment.
    He would.
  • Options
    FishCostaFortuneFishCostaFortune
    edited September 2020
    Is everyone having a meltdown already and think Charlton are going to lose after hearing 10 minutes of one side of the argument.

    I mean that might just be the case, but come one, it's a game of two halves people.
  • Options
    mascot88mascot88
    It’s all about solidifying their position so they can demand more from TS.

    fuck the club 
    fuck the fans
    just give me the money
  • Options
    aliwibblealiwibble
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says contract to sell is signed and not in dispute. Drag along provisions re Southall activated in May.
    Can anyone explain this in simple English for me please
  • Options
    ozaddickozaddick
    golfaddick said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says contract to sell is signed and not in dispute. Drag along provisions re Southall activated in May.
    not in dispute by whom ?  Nimer or Elliott.

    All the rest is just guff. The main issue is does Elliott have a signed  agreement tat says he has the exclusive right to buy.
    Exactly this. This all depends on the documents and contracts. If elliottttt has a signed contract saying the club is his, that’s it in a nutshell. 
  • Options
    kentaddickkentaddick
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Confirms that Elliott has submitted an appeal in relation to his disqualification by the EFL. Chaisty says Farnell’s role should be disregarded for the moment.
    Why?? Can’t see a judge agreeing with that.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!