Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…2627293132…175

Comments

  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,258
    Chaisty: the EFL said on Aug 7th that the agreement was not conditional (as Mihail asserts) and that Elliott's application was rejected due to claims he mislead the EFL.
  • mattinfinland
    mattinfinland Posts: 1,096
    anyone wanna summarise in simple terms what has been said so far? I really do not understand any of this fancy lawyer talk. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,624
    ForeverAddickted said:
    So we want this answered and dealt with quickly, yet dont want this answered and dealt with quickly!!
    This. Just more stalling from PE.
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,602
    Indianaaddick said:
    Judge has just put a black cap on top of his wig what does this mean?.
    Not in the least bit funny
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    edited September 2020
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If defendant is now arguing that there was a requirement for the EFL approval to be in place at completion then Nimer had no business allowing Elliott put money into the club subsequently, says Chaisty.
    Turn that on it's head - Elliott had no business putting money in then?
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,781
    carly burn said:
    AFKABartram said:
    So ESI 1 are being represented by one of the Supporters Trust board???

    Blimey, Never saw that coming
     Thinks she's a very tough cookie with a good background in law.
    You would hope so, wouldn't you?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty says that this is a serious argument that needs to go to trial, hence need for the injunction to be granted. Only at end of July did Panorama start talking about terminating the agreement.
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,167
    mattinfinland said:
    anyone wanna summarise in simple terms what has been said so far? I really do not understand any of this fancy lawyer talk. 
    Don't much care about all the talk.  Just want to read the line "Injunction refused".
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    mattinfinland said:
    anyone wanna summarise in simple terms what has been said so far? I really do not understand any of this fancy lawyer talk. 

    Basically, Chaisty is saying that there is a firm contractual agreement between ESI2 and Panorama Magic to sell them the club and that they want to go to trial to enforce that sale. (I think)
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,008
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says that this is a serious argument that needs to go to trial, hence need for the injunction to be granted. Only at end of July did Panorama start talking about terminating the agreement.
    So Elliott understands the need to resolve this quickly........but is perfectly happy for a long drawn out trial.

    Bloke doesn't give a shit about the club at all.
  • Sponsored links:



  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    edited September 2020
    This Elliotttttt is literally about to collapse our club...needs fucking sorting 
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Bless You
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says that this is a serious argument that needs to go to trial, hence need for the injunction to be granted. Only at end of July did Panorama start talking about terminating the agreement.

    Will Sandgaard wait that long?
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    meldrew66 said:
    mattinfinland said:
    anyone wanna summarise in simple terms what has been said so far? I really do not understand any of this fancy lawyer talk. 

    Basically, Chaisty is saying that there is a firm contractual agreement between ESI2 and Panorama Magic to sell them the club and that they want to go to trial to enforce that sale. (I think)
     Think you are right. And that there are so many holes in the agreement between 1&2 there is definitely a case ...for a case.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says that this is a serious argument that needs to go to trial, hence need for the injunction to be granted. Only at end of July did Panorama start talking about terminating the agreement.

    Will Sandgaard wait that long?
    Wonder if this is when he'll increase his pay off
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,975
    How has this amazing football club ended up in this shit. Fucking scum.
  • mattinfinland
    mattinfinland Posts: 1,096
    Relax, its just one side of the story, OFC his lawyer is going to say anything to convince the judge.
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,258
    Chaisty: Elliott put "hundreds of thousands of pounds" into the club to keep it afloat.
  • Redvalleyeast
    Redvalleyeast Posts: 4,689
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says that this is a serious argument that needs to go to trial, hence need for the injunction to be granted. Only at end of July did Panorama start talking about terminating the agreement.
    So Elliott understands the need to resolve this quickly........but is perfectly happy for a long drawn out trial.

    Bloke doesn't give a shit about the club at all.
    There wont be anything to sell if the club gets expelled from the league Eliottt,you fucking scumbag
  • Sponsored links:



  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,624
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If defendant is now arguing that there was a requirement for the EFL approval to be in place at completion then Nimer had no business allowing Elliott put money into the club subsequently, says Chaisty.
    Turn that on it's head - Elliott had no business putting money in then?
    yep. His lawyer is trying to blame Nimer for letting PE put money in when he knew he didnt own it 
  • Lordflashheart
    Lordflashheart Posts: 5,619
    Even if it is a poorly constructed agreement, Elliott entered into it - he can’t now cry wolf about it - he made his bed etc
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,258


    Chaisty: It wasn't until the 12 of August (2.5 months after signing the agreement) that the defendant claimed the deal could be terminated.
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,602
    Has anyone anywhere seen any proof that PE has put any money into the club?
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    carly burn said:
    meldrew66 said:
    mattinfinland said:
    anyone wanna summarise in simple terms what has been said so far? I really do not understand any of this fancy lawyer talk. 

    Basically, Chaisty is saying that there is a firm contractual agreement between ESI2 and Panorama Magic to sell them the club and that they want to go to trial to enforce that sale. (I think)
     Think you are right. And that there are so many holes in the agreement between 1&2 there is definitely a case ...for a case.
    There is also a case for them to just sue.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    mattinfinland said:
    Relax, its just one side of the story, OFC his lawyer is going to say anything to convince the judge.
    Seriously, people panic when we got 1-0 down after about 5mins on the pitch, you got no hope ;)
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Yes. Need to here Nimers/our side of things.

    It is a complete f****g mess though.
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,881
    edited September 2020
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If defendant is now arguing that there was a requirement for the EFL approval to be in place at completion then Nimer had no business allowing Elliott put money into the club subsequently, says Chaisty.
    Or Elliot shouldn’t have put money in
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty says the EFL letter of August 7th deals with Elliott and insists the sale and purchase agreement not conditional. Mihail provided statement to EFL that sale was complete on June 8th.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”