Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…2930323435…175

Comments

  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Why are they already talking about potential court/trials when we/the club haven't even given the other side of the argument yet?

    Indeed. Surely, Lauren's gotta have a say soon!
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Why are they already talking about potential court/trials when we/the club haven't even given the other side of the argument yet?
    Seems like the points of law must be pretty clear. Depressing.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty says there is "press speculation" over negotiations but Mihail has been "entirely silent" on what is happening to Lex Dominus.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Why are they already talking about potential court/trials when we/the club haven't even given the other side of the argument yet?
    You always finish the 1st innings before you start the second. 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    The rebuttal of this will be interesting
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty: Mr Mihail's evidence for this case is "absolutely hopeless" #cafc #SaveCAFC
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Mihail jumping the gun saying he's got a buyer ready to sign on Tuesday without mentioning this claim getting sorted.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Looks to me that Nimer didn't care and wanted shot then got interested again when Sandgaard came on the scene. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    kentaddick said:
    The only thing that Elliot has is the money thing... however, if I put money into a bank account that isn’t owned by me, then what right do I have to that money? 
    Clearly not if you are listening.
  • robinofottershaw
    robinofottershaw Posts: 1,921
    “Damages would clearly be inadequate”, ie Elliott wants the shares in order he can scalp TS.
  • Sponsored links:



  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,031
    Covered End said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says the EFL letter of August 7th deals with Elliott and insists the sale and purchase agreement not conditional. Mihail provided statement to EFL that sale was complete on June 8th.
    Brilliant Mihail wrote to EFL confirming the club was sold to Elliot.
    Oh dear.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty turning to "adequacy of damages" - damages would not be adequate.

    "We will not have the share. It would make it a complete nonsense to have a trial when the shares have already gone."
  • mattinfinland
    mattinfinland Posts: 1,096
    Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?

    EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
  • Salad
    Salad Posts: 10,189
    hmm think I will wait for the post-match thread and the player marks thread
  • Jints
    Jints Posts: 3,491
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Why are they already talking about potential court/trials when we/the club haven't even given the other side of the argument yet?
    Because delay is one of the factors in making the decision. If everyone could be ready next week there would be limited harm to ESL1 if they were right. If not for 6 months, the harm would be exacerbated. 
  • peterreeves
    peterreeves Posts: 1,062
    MM ain't looking to rosy is he!

    Feels like fcuking amateur hour! 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says there is "press speculation" over negotiations but Mihail has been "entirely silent" on what is happening to Lex Dominus.
    So Mihail is now selling Lex Dominus?!?!?! 
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,961
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Looks to me that Nimer didn't care and wanted shot then got interested again when Sandgaard came on the scene. 

    Exactly how i see it. Deserves to lose his money, except he never put any in
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Looks to me that Nimer didn't care and wanted shot then got interested again when Sandgaard came on the scene. 
    Why hasn’t he got his own lawyer defending this? 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Panorama a shell company. That's the rub
  • Sponsored links:



  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,258


    Chaisty: Damages would not be adequate remedy
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    Covered End said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says the EFL letter of August 7th deals with Elliott and insists the sale and purchase agreement not conditional. Mihail provided statement to EFL that sale was complete on June 8th.
    Brilliant Mihail wrote to EFL confirming the club was sold to Elliot.
    Oh dear.
    But it can't be 'sold to Elliott' because he has no official role in ESI2. True?
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    Can see why Mihail was practicing deleting his Twitter account yesterday. He's going to get some pelters off the back of this if it doesn't end well
  • robinofottershaw
    robinofottershaw Posts: 1,921
    robinofottershaw said:
    “Damages would clearly be inadequate”, ie Elliott wants the shares in order he can scalp TS.
    Mihail can offer no assurances of the ability of Panorama to pay any damages and admits it is a shell company. Has no assets in this country.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    meldrew66 said:
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    Covered End said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says the EFL letter of August 7th deals with Elliott and insists the sale and purchase agreement not conditional. Mihail provided statement to EFL that sale was complete on June 8th.
    Brilliant Mihail wrote to EFL confirming the club was sold to Elliot.
    Oh dear.
    But it can't be 'sold to Elliott' because he has no official role in ESI2. True?
    He’s a director of ESI v2 isn’t he?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    From the Trust...

    Can't quantify potential damages? Well you bought #cafc for £1 so there's a clue for you.
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    se9addick said:
    meldrew66 said:
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    Covered End said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says the EFL letter of August 7th deals with Elliott and insists the sale and purchase agreement not conditional. Mihail provided statement to EFL that sale was complete on June 8th.
    Brilliant Mihail wrote to EFL confirming the club was sold to Elliot.
    Oh dear.
    But it can't be 'sold to Elliott' because he has no official role in ESI2. True?
    He’s a director of ESI v2 isn’t he?
    I didn't think he was listed as a director at Companies House and, therefore, no?
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    2hrs you say.....
  • Crispy
    Crispy Posts: 586
    Sweepstake on what time this goes on till?
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”