Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…3132343637…175

Comments

  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    Mihail is a complete joke. No better than the rest of them
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,210
    Can our geeza talk now, they didn’t rattle on this long in their opening dialogue in a few good men or Philadelphia.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    “Real risk” that the club would not be allowed to start the season, according to Mihail. Chaisty again argues he hasn’t shown any evidence of this. Ridiculing Mihail’s use of language.
  • thickandthin63
    thickandthin63 Posts: 2,952
    All this talk about letters,contracts etc.is anyone actually producing them in court.
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    This entire case is to decide who gets TS's money. Makes me sick.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    edited September 2020
    Chaisty: "Where has Panorama put any money into this club in recent months? It hasn't."

    YOU'VE ALREADY SAID THAT!!!!!!!!!!!
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    I hope LK can pull a rabbit out the hat because this has been a poor first half not helped by the grim reapers. Go Lauren.
  • Jints
    Jints Posts: 3,490
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty turning to "adequacy of damages" - damages would not be adequate.

    "We will not have the share. It would make it a complete nonsense to have a trial when the shares have already gone."
    Don't understand this unless he is saying that damages not adequate remedy because no way of securing payment against a shell company. 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Should the judge not be wrapping him up now?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    Chaisty: Elliott has made the point that Nimer has "washed his hands of the club" #cafc #SaveCAFC
  • Sponsored links:



  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,880
    does our barrister get to speak? I thought that esi v2 get to argue why they want an injunction and trial and our barrister only speaks if there is a trial?
  • mattinfinland
    mattinfinland Posts: 1,096
    Hes just repeating himself now, tell him to stfu and let LK speak
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    Chaisty arguing no evidence of a causative loss the injunction would make. 
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,007
    What is our lawyer's background? I'm hoping she's better than Mihail!
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,364
    We’re getting fucked by an actual Lawyer aren’t we.

    Couldnt even get that right. Wouldn’t be surprised if Mihail comes of injured or some shit soon.
  • WestCountryAddick
    WestCountryAddick Posts: 2,545
    KentishAddick said:
    This entire case is to decide who gets TS's money. Makes me sick.

    Maybe this is why Thomas is in town, because he thinks that either way, he can still buy the club, this hearing only decides where the money goes perhaps?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    Chaisty keeps banging home his argument that they've seen no evidence that the injunction will cause any harm to the football club.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    It's a good score, Bumble.  But, I would like to see what it's like after both sides have batted. 
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Chunes said:
    Chaisty arguing no evidence of a causative loss the injunction would make. 
    He knows what’s coming then.
  • Sponsored links:



  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    Lex Dominus agreement is to buy ESI for £1.
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,727
    edited September 2020
    KentishAddick said:
    Mihail is a complete joke. No better than the rest of them
    The sensible among us knew that. Others wanted him kept on on the board following an interview last week.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,623
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty says there is no evidence from the EFL that they will not allow Charlton to compete in League One or that there could be a points penalty.
    But the EFL aren't going to make a judgement like that until after the season starts, as was the case with Bury. The EFL also wouldn't got make a cast iron guarantee either way. 
  • Valley27000
    Valley27000 Posts: 3,417
    PE has put money into the club Nimer did not.Say PE wins then sells too TS everyone hapoy?.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    edited September 2020
    se9addick said:
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Looks to me that Nimer didn't care and wanted shot then got interested again when Sandgaard came on the scene. 
    Why hasn’t he got his own lawyer defending this? 
    Because it costs a lot of money and he hasn't got any?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,303
    Valley27000 said:
    PE has put money into the club Nimer did not.Say PE wins then sells too TS everyone hapoy?.
    Wont be happy until the sale happens!!... No confidence in PE dragging it out to get as much back as possible
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    Laddick01 said:
    We’re getting fucked by an actual Lawyer aren’t we.

    Couldnt even get that right. Wouldn’t be surprised if Mihail comes of injured or some shit soon.
    Just wait - we have an actual lawyer who is about to get her chance to speak. 
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    RedChaser said:
    Our Barrister is s Charlton fan and a lot closer to the club than anyone in that courtroom and will be giving it her best shot don't you worry #teamLauren keep the faith 😘xxx

    However, this a contract law matter, not an emotive, passionate fan-related motion.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Lex Dominus agreement is to buy ESI for £1.
    Judge roles eyes and whispers "Oh for fuck sake..."
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”