Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Bold to assume PE will sell to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks
36 -
ElliotCAFC said:Bold to assume PE will to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks3
-
Is Chaisty Colin Robinson in disguise?
5 -
Jints said:Cafc43v3r said:Jints said:Cafc43v3r said:mattinfinland said:Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.0 -
Let’s hope LK didn’t get injured in the warm up.0
-
Callumcafc said:cafcfan1990 said:Makes no difference to TS I'm sure. He either pays Elliott or pays Nimer.0
-
Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.0 -
se9addick said:meldrew66 said:There is one single, simple decision for the judge: Is there (yes or no) a legally binding agreement for ESI to buy the club from Panorama Magic?Could be wrong.0
-
Is LK sitting on a throne?0
-
My god this fella goes on and on repeating the same stuff and contradicting himself1
- Sponsored links:
-
Clear provision of false or misleading information to the EFL is reason for disqualification on August 7th. Chaisty argues that right to appeal to arbitration panel is clear, but says Mihail misunderstands rules. Throws doubt on his other points re EFL.
0 -
Chizz said:"The referee's assistant has indicated there will be a minimum of 60 minutes additional time".0
-
EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.
Yet even Sandgaard said that the EFL had told him that it was Nimer who was the owner?0 -
roseandcrown said:Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.1 -
ElliotCAFC said:Bold to assume PE will sell to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks
A quick profit and a nice clean exit.0 -
EFL are cowards. They have been waiting for this hearing I assume when they needed to get those appeals heard quickly to inform the hearing.5
-
ozaddick said:roseandcrown said:Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.7 -
Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true8 -
ozaddick said:roseandcrown said:Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.1 -
ForeverAddickted said:EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.7
- Sponsored links:
-
Trying to keep up on this thread, Cawley's twitter and keeping an eye on Kent score, nothing going to well but always hope1
-
roseandcrown said:ozaddick said:roseandcrown said:Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.2 -
Lauren pulled a face boring bloke casting doubt on mm as Romanian lawyer0
-
meldrew66 said:There is one single, simple decision for the judge: Is there (yes or no) a legally binding agreement for ESI to buy the club from Panorama Magic?
Case closed.0 -
carly burn said:Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true2 -
an argument that's he foreign so wrong, is a bit of a reach (he might be wrong, but even so)0
-
Glad I didn't bother signing in again. Me bottle of Fischer been drunk already0
-
1 hour, 20 minutes into a 2 hour case and the defence hasn't spoken yet...…………..that's gotta be close to a record?!
5 -
ozaddick said:roseandcrown said:Callumcafc said:golfaddick said:Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.
1 -
randy andy said:ForeverAddickted said:EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.
I dare say LK might bring that point up. Same judge, after all - he wont take kindly to having been lied to
3
This discussion has been closed.