Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Chaisty: We are looking for a short-term remedy in order to solve the matter with a trial0
-
If Nimer was coerced into unknowingly selling the club to a company owned by the lawyer (Farnell) who was supposed to be representing his interests, then I cannot see how that contract can be legally binding.
If Elliott is out of pocket, he should seek damages from Farnell.
Contrary to what their Barrister is saying, I think Farnell s role in this is extremely relevant.17 -
I just said the same thing to a mate.Leeds_Addick said:Is this guy just trying to get through to 5pm and force the whole thing to be extended?0 -
Laura opens up by singing
We hate millwall and we hate millwall.
Judge loves it.50 -
An early goal for the defence in the 2nd half,great start.....0
-
Does anyone remember if the question of 'Who actually owns the football club?' was discussed or confirmed during the ESI/Farnell/Southall hearing on July 17th?ForeverAddickted said:EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.
Yet even Sandgaard said that the EFL had told him that it was Nimer who was the owner?0 -
Reckon Lozza gonna pull something like this out the bag matequeensland_addick said:If Nimer was coerced into unknowingly selling the club to a company owned by the lawyer (Farnell) who was supposed to be representing his interests, then I cannot see how that contract can be legally binding.
If Elliott is out of pocket, he should seek damages from Farnell.
Contrary to what their Barrister is saying, I think Farnell s role in this is extremely relevant.0 -
Surrey Chaisty 161-4
Kreamer batting now3 -
"not black and white"...…..the trouble with that comment (Laura) is that all Chaisty needs is 'grey' to win an injunction and go to court!
0 -
I hope Lauren comes up with something concrete very quickly.
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Well done Diego1
-
F**K me, she's only had 5 minutesmeldrew66 said:I hope Lauren comes up with something concrete very quickly.6 -
Diego has got better things to do that us sad fuckers watching this3
-
That first sentence is a crock of shit. We are currently under a transfer embargo. As every day passes more harm is done by not being able to bring in players. That lawyer needs stringing up for that sentence alone.swords_alive said:
From 20 mins ago, just for the record-Chaisty: There is no evidence that this injunction will cause the club harm or deny it any benefitsChaisty: Elliott has made the point that Nimer has "washed his hands of the club"5 -
Kreamer outlining the structure of ESI and says Mihail is "clearly authorised" to give evidence on behalf of Panorama.
0 -
Kreamer says Mihail a director of Panorama and ESI. Says he has "relevant expertise" and that he is liaising with EFL and is involved day-to-day running of the club.
0 -
Imagine Chaisty as your complaining neighbour. He looks a right one!
1 -
Chaisty looks a really arrogant bastard.
Seems he can't really be arsed to be there.
4 -
Tough. PE should have thought about that before trying to buy us then.Covered End said:
QC arguing that damages are no good because Panorama is a shell company based in Abu Dhabi and have no assets to pay any damages.Cafc43v3r said:
But that could be settle with damages at a later point.Jints said:
Disagree. ESI 1 can argue that delay diminishes the asset because of the imminent start of the season and potentially removes the chance of a sale. Therefore an interim injunction should not be awarded.Cafc43v3r said:
It's legally nothing to do with football ffs.mattinfinland said:Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.2 -
LaurenChunes said:
Yes. And Laura's started well.bigstemarra said:Has that gobshite QC shut up yet?5 -
Sponsored links:
-
Well Kent has won lets us hope LK has the same result7
-
Kreamer defends Mihail’s “expertise” on this matter as director of CAFC and the person dealing with the EFL after Chaisty pointed out that he was not a director of Panorama. Nimer’s English not good enough, hence Mihail bearing witness for him.
0 -
Maybe Chaisty was a bit hasty and got a bit complacent.
Fingers crossed0 -
Seems to have slowed down?0
-
-
Oh god, I am SO far behind on this. Expect the full bitesize sometime tomorrow
7 -
She's bringing up Farnell...4
-
LK brings up Farnell via Lex Dominus. This should get good.3
-
Lex Dominus was a company solely owned by Chris Farnell until 5th/6th June when PE took over
8 -
Indeed (cos someone had to provide it!!!);Kreamer says Mihail is the best-placed person to give evidence as he has been advising and running things on the ground
0
This discussion has been closed.
















