If Lauren pulls this off, Mrs Otto better get used to me calling her Name out when we are having our monthly bunk up. The good news is Mrs Otto is called Lauren as well - so I can’t go wrong.
Panorama argues that while the July court case had different parties, the same “cast of characters” is involved. Court held then that shares were still owned by Panorama. Judge was same.
I asked about that on page 40. That's the answer we needed.
Kreamer: The court already determined who owned the shared on July 13 (Panorama). Nothing has changed since then.
Adds the applicant now is trying to circumvent that decision with this injunction.
Kreamer making the case that on two occasions in July the court - and the same judge - made clear that the ownership of the club was still under the control of Panorama Magic.
Also says that court has no details on why the EFL turned down Elliott under the OADT.
May SPA has not been carried into effect, says Kreamer. EFL view not binding on the court, just it’s opinion, and no evidence provided for it.
May be a silly question, but is LK a Charlton supporter?
Yes
Farnell has complained that this is a conflict of interest.
Desperation, hopefully
LK, in being on the board of CAST, has the best interests of Charlton Athletic Football Club at heart. In saying that this would be a conflict of interests suggests that Farnell does not... why is he seeking an injunction to the sale of CAFC if he does not have it's best interests at heart?
Kreamer: May SPA is undated, states that it relates to share capital of CAFC Limited, not ESI, and contact details for service of notices not competed.
Kreamer saying agreement was not complete. Refers to the SPA and where there are blanks to be filled in.
I'm shocked that Chaisty forgot to mention this...
I know being passionate and emotive as a fan in this case won't bring any bonus points from the judge but I'm so glad we have a fan up there going into bat and she is doing a grand Job.
Comments
If Yes then what is that... If No then the injuncture can so fuck itself
Said this on the main thread, one thing has happened since then - Elliott officially FAILED the OADT
May SPA has not been carried into effect, says Kreamer. EFL view not binding on the court, just it’s opinion, and no evidence provided for it.
LK, in being on the board of CAST, has the best interests of Charlton Athletic Football Club at heart. In saying that this would be a conflict of interests suggests that Farnell does not... why is he seeking an injunction to the sale of CAFC if he does not have it's best interests at heart?
Kreamer saying agreement was not complete. Refers to the SPA and where there are blanks to be filled in.
I'm shocked that Chaisty forgot to mention this...