Is the solution here that Sandgaard takes ownership of the club by paying an amount that both ESI versions agree to but which is held by a third party until ESIv1 and ESIv2 settle who gets what between them?
Kreamer says Mihail a director of Panorama and ESI. Says he has "relevant expertise" and that he is liaising with EFL and is involved day-to-day running of the club.
I’m now on the train on the way to the work for a night shift. I’ve got the match day nerves not being able to view the hearing. Come on Ms Kraemer deliver a deserved victory for the Charlton fans please.
Kreamer listing the various parties represented by Farnell. Too long to type out, but it's pretty much everyone involved.
"Very clear conflict"
#cafc#SaveCAFC
Kreamer for Panorama says that Chaisty hasn’t referred to his own client’s evidence, which she says is scant and incoherent.
Said earlier that if PE had anything concrete then his lawyer would have said so. If all you can do is trash the opposition you don't have much of a case.
If Lauren pulls this off, Mrs Otto better get used to me calling her Name out when we are having our monthly bunk up. The good news is Mrs Otto is called Lauren as well - so I can’t go wrong.
Clear the Panorama case is going to revolve around conflict of interest by Farnell who is the subject of two SRA complains. Unable to comply with duty of confidentiality given the number of roles he had, says Kreamer.
Comments
It's Lauren - you should get this right as she is the new queen of Charlton
BOOM
Farnell's conflict of interest is being outlined. What was that, acting for 5/6 companies on the buy/sale side? I lost count.