Sanctions facing #cafc are of the most serious nature, says Kreamer. Judge interjects that Mihail is the only one giving evidence on this and he is not sure what weight to give his evidence, given he was wrong in his evidence about appeal.
Imagine if the injunction doesn't get granted all because Elliott couldn't even be bothered to stump up a quid. He'd be below even Southall on the league table of not having a pot to piss in.
The judge has stepped in to raise the concern of what "weight" he can place on Mihail's evidence.
Kreamer had already said MM apologised for "an error" on his views on how the OADT system works. Says it has been corrected and rest of his evidence should be taken "at face value".
Is the case that PE already owns the club (which now seems very doubtful) or that he should have first dibs at buying it because he has an agreement with ESI to do so.
The first point seems to have been blown out the water, the second one not so much, although it might depend on the "conditions" that have been mentioned.
Definitely think it's back to 1-1. Later winner anyone....?
Judge asked for evidence that the club would be in danger, Lauren struggling a bit on the reply, saying he should trust Mihail's submission that that's so
Yes, I don't understand why we haven't got something from EFL that stated the 'implications' for the club of not getting the ownership sorted by whatever the key dates are.
If Panorama had had no interest in the OADT it wouldn’t have included it in the SPA in the first place. Needed because you can legally buy the club but not be allowed to play in the EFL.
Judge asked for evidence that the club would be in danger, Laura struggling a bit on the reply, saying he should trust Mihail's submission that that's so
The fact that the pound was never "paid" is not relevant. The pound represents a consideration. Not paying the pound doesn't void the contract, it merely opens up a separate action in debt. In other words, Elliot not paying the pound simply means he owes a pound.
Further: DICHAND v HYDRAREDOX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED
Sanctions facing #cafc are of the most serious nature, says Kreamer. Judge interjects that Mihail is the only one giving evidence on this and he is not sure what weight to give his evidence, given he was wrong in his evidence about appeal.
Just because you got 1 thing wrong shouldn't mean the rest of what you say is wrong.
Comments
And up against a Junior with 3 years call, ouch!
The first point seems to have been blown out the water, the second one not so much, although it might depend on the "conditions" that have been mentioned.
Definitely think it's back to 1-1. Later winner anyone....?
Probably expecting Potless Elliot to knock him for his fee anyway
"You're crazy". Pretty sure that's what he said, his wifi signal isn't great.
Further: DICHAND v HYDRAREDOX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED