ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
PeanutsMolloy said:
Seems to me that, notwithstanding the hours of argument (and waffle) and the £££,£££s of legal costs incurred, the verdict is likely to be precisely that predicted by many here weeks ago.
Namely that:
1. the sale by Panorama to Lex Dom is indeed contingent on the buyer (i.e. owner of LD - currently PE) passing the EFL's OADT
2. the buyer has the right, under that contract, for its appeal against the EFL's initial rejection to be seen through to the completion.
Thus the injunction preventing Panorama from selling CAFC to a third party will be granted and take effect until such time as the appeal process is completed.
If the appeal is successful then ownership of CAFC will vest with Lex Dom. If it isn't, it stays with Panorama.Ball in EFL's court.
0 -
stoneroses19 said:Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?1
-
Obviously we had the late start and then probably two-and-a-half hours of legal representation.0
-
Sorry been busy with a sick child today, can anyone enlighten me on what clanger MM dropped?0
-
ForeverAddickted said:Oh stop Lauren, please... He's already dead!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
14 -
Didn't hear Chaisty bring up any legal precedent?1
-
Cor, hurry up Lauren ffs2
-
LK arguing that damages would be a perfectly adequate remedy therefore no injunction needed (and harm caused to Panorama would be disproportionate)
5 -
i_b_b_o_r_g said:stoneroses19 said:Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?1
- Sponsored links:
-
RodneyCharltonTrotta said:ForeverAddickted said:
Definitely Tracey29 -
Yes, let the crooks fight each other for the money. Just get them ALL out of the club. That includes you MM and TN.6
-
ross1 said:Obviously we had the late start and then probably two-and-a-half hours of legal representation.3
-
Now describing the EFL's relevance, albeit currently hypothetical
0 -
We're going to plow on for now. Kreamer says she has 15-20 minutes of further argument.0
-
Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit4
-
CheshireAddick said:Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit21
-
CheshireAddick said:Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit2
-
CheshireAddick said:Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit0
-
Stating very unlikely that Elliottttt could be approved by the EFL given the wording of their response alongside their rules3
- Sponsored links:
-
Someone let me know if cahones appears at farnells with a tray of tea a biscuits.0
-
Kreamer argues court should take the course of action that would cause the least irreversible damage. Argues risk to #cafc outweighs risk to Lex Dominus6
-
CheshireAddick said:Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit0
-
Now addressing source and sufficiency issue - Farnelliot dont have it. Bury FC now raised, Chaisty's arguments being rebutted.
7 -
Kreamer says Mihael asserts there is a "very real risk" of serious sanctions - including expulsion - being imposed on the club. Mentions Bury. "It is not pie in the sky to state a football club - as a matter of fact - be expelled and cease to exist."4
-
swords_alive said:We're going to plow on for now. Kreamer says she has 15-20 minutes of further argument.0
-
Callumcafc said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:Addickted said:Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.10
-
It may be telling that ESI2 have not explained why they expect to win the EFL appeal. Surely if it was on a technicality that was easy to remedy, they would refer directly to what that was. The EFL have had loads of time to have heard this. They are a disgrace to the game.3
-
We need the wisdom of Solomon. Give them £0.50p1