Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…4849515354…175

Comments

  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,289
    mrbligh said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge has bottled it then? 
    don't think so. just our main 'witness' as it were is a clown/chancer/lovely guy and should be kept on in some capacity 

    He has been shown up for what he is today.......'great' on social media but not so much when it matters 
    Team game @mrbligh. MMs submission would have been shared and checked and updated wjere necessary by the cafc/ESI legal team (i presume).
  • Lordflashheart
    Lordflashheart Posts: 5,624
    So no injunction means ES1 can sell to TS and ES1 and ES2 argue the toss later, whilst CAFC sails into a stunning future free of the snakes ?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,346
    TS won't wait until November. 
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,032
    R
    ichard Cawley

    Judge Richard Pearce says both parties have respectable arguments.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,070
    Ryan Mason - bloody hell 
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,334
    Lordflashheart said:
    So no injunction means ES1 can sell to TS and ES1 and ES2 argue the toss later, whilst CAFC sails into a stunning future free of the snakes ?
    Yes
  • craigcafc
    craigcafc Posts: 629
    The case is going to trial come what may - the issue is whether to grant an injunction to prevent a trial beforehand. That is why they have been making submissions about whether damages are a suitable resolution - if so, no need for an injubction to prevent the sale.
  • Gammon
    Gammon Posts: 339
    ross1 said:
    R
    ichard Cawley

    Judge Richard Pearce says both parties have respectable arguments.
    Do they fuck
  • CheshireAddick
    CheshireAddick Posts: 1,305
    Thank god for that 😅🤣

  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,947
    I guess from the judge's point of view, us not being able to strengthen the side before the transfer window closes isn't relevant to this case.
  • jacob_CAFC
    jacob_CAFC Posts: 2,063
    hahahahhahahaha that person 
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,223
    0-1 Addicks
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,729
    0-1 cafc
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,825
    Who anyone who cares. Ozzie scores from a free kick. 1-0 on 22 minutes.
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,556
    Eejits interrupting.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,346
    0-1 (Oztumer 21') 

    Sorry, wrong thread
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    Karim_myBagheri said:
    Judge bottling it just like the EFL. how do these pricks get in to positions of power. 
    Brown envelopes 
  • Gammon
    Gammon Posts: 339
    killerandflash said:
    I guess from the judge's point of view, us not being able to strengthen the side before the transfer window closes isn't relevant to this case.
    He does realise the asset is a football ckub
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,394
    We may not like the decision but I hope our fans can respect this is a UK court of law and not swear down the mic

  • Sponsored links:



  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,710
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    I hope NLA, Dodger and the gang are all set to pay Elliott a visit very soon.
    Hopefully they wont need to... Be good if Louis can chat with TS after the game
  • WelshAddick
    WelshAddick Posts: 1,321
    I feel sick ! 
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,289
    LenGlover said:
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    To be honest, MM made that likely. What a plank. 
    Probably by design in my opinion.

    He's one of them don't forget.
    This is ridiculous. What would you, lock him away and forbid he gives evidence? He is the incumbent and it fell to him to provide the submission presumably through others to the court.
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,589
    I hate this fucker 
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,422
    Only Charltone ffs, this mess will never end will it?  :'(
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,947
    Gammon said:
    killerandflash said:
    I guess from the judge's point of view, us not being able to strengthen the side before the transfer window closes isn't relevant to this case.
    He does realise the asset is a football ckub
    But the law isn't interested in whether we can out out a decent side against Hull

    IF the club was in genuine danger, that's different of course
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,281
    WelshAddick said:
    I feel sick ! 
    As do I.

    I am also shaking, nerves and anger.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”