Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…5152545657…175

Comments

  • Chris_from_SidcupChris_from_Sidcup
    Part of me says we're fucked and TS will walk away if this drags on until November.

    Another part says TS will just say right i'll pay both ESI 1 and 2, a couple of million each to fuck off. 
  • se9addickse9addick
    Atletico Addick said:
    Their lawyer banging on about evidence and lack of yet I've not heard an iota from himself, all hearsay and spiel. All a huge shame this. Kreamer very respectable but we've been cornered by corruptness. Super upsetting and the ripple effect will be huge sadly.
    Didn’t he provide a statement on Charlton letterheaded paper from Mihail saying the shares in ESI had been transferred? I’m sure he said that earlier. 
  • ross1ross1
    Judge again saying that he doesn't see staging a trial in October as being realistic.
  • charlton_herocharlton_hero
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Part of me says we're fucked and TS will walk away if this drags on until November.

    Another part says TS will just say right i'll pay both ESI 1 and 2, a couple of million each to fuck off. 
    Wishful thinking I reckon.
  • ross1ross1
    Chaisty saying Elliott "not turning a blind eye" to ways to assist everyone - including the club. He says interim order protects him being part of the procedure.
  • i_b_b_o_r_gi_b_b_o_r_g
    edited September 2020
    Redrobo said:
    Will the offer to pay Elliott his money back plus fifty grand get mentioned and turn the tide?
    Said this earlier. If LK says that they ain't got any dough to move forward and were offered their money back, plus compensation, and STILL won't go, it must mean they've got a alterior motive?
  • Valley11Valley11
    Why is the other bloke talking again to refute LK’s evidence? Is she going to do the same?
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    KentishAddick said:
    Dippenhall said:
    Even the opposition saying we played a crap game.
    I don't understand why we didn't provide some evidence to show a sale is under way.
    NDA's? 
  • CallumcafcCallumcafc
    The judge can only go on what's been submitted. No evidence of Sandgaard's interaction with the EFL etc was submitted and "internet rumours" is not enough to go off of. That's my understanding.
  • Sponsored links:


  • roseandcrownroseandcrown
    Nonce? 
  • No.1 in South LondonNo.1 in South London
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Is LK getting another crack aswell?
    No, the claimant gets the final say before the judge decides next steps.......
  • cafcpolocafcpolo
    Yes Jimmy Hart, yes you are a nonce.
  • jacob_CAFCjacob_CAFC
    Another idiot saying something. Called the judge a nonce it seems 
  • carly burncarly burn
    Judgement icoming
  • Karim_myBagheriKarim_myBagheri
    ross1 said:
    Judge again saying that he doesn't see staging a trial in October as being realistic.
    do Judges do any homework on these things or do they just walk in blind to any of the facts of the case? 
  • jacob_CAFCjacob_CAFC
    Chunes said:
    These grown men chiming in are embarassing
    Yeah it's pathetic. Childish fools
  • JamesSeedJamesSeed
    Jimmy H says ‘nonce’. Not sure how helpful that is. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • GammonGammon
    Why they not mute everyone 
  • BedsaddickBedsaddick
    We’re Fooked
  • i_b_b_o_r_gi_b_b_o_r_g
    No.1 in South London said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Is LK getting another crack aswell?
    No, the claimant gets the final say before the judge decides next steps.......
    Deep joy
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    Maybe Thomas can talk to ESI 2, offer them the same deal as ESI 1 and money could be paid into a neutral account until they legally settle with each other. This could be attractive for ESI2 as they do have difficulties like EFL appeal going against them. Then maybe a complex legal sale could be made.
  • ross1ross1

    Judge Richard Pearce about to pass judgement, which will take about 30 minutes.
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    30mins to pass judgment apparently 
  • golfaddickgolfaddick
    ross1 said:
    Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"
    The fecking risk is that club is still under an embargo & so we can't buy any players. Can't Lauren fucking make this point VERY STRONGLY. 
  • se9addickse9addick
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Maybe Thomas can talk to ESI 2, offer them the same deal as ESI 1 and money could be paid into a neutral account until they legally settle with each other. This could be attractive for ESI2 as they do have difficulties like EFL appeal going against them. Then maybe a complex legal sale could be made.
    How can the sale be made without the owner receiving compensation?
  • DRAddickDRAddick
    Chunes said:
    These grown men chiming in are embarassing

    We should just be grateful no one's stolen the judge's laptop.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!