Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…5354565859…175

Comments

  • jacob_CAFCjacob_CAFC
    ct_addick said:
    Does the judge not understand our predicament? Elliot and Chaisty be prepared for a bunch of flowers to be delivered. Ironically my son is at law school but I cannot understand these lawyers defending these con-men and crooks. 

    money
  • se9addickse9addick
    If anyone knows Jimmy Hart you should text him and tell him to stop misbehaving - he’s going to get himself into trouble. 
  • soapboxsamsoapboxsam
    Chizz said:
    TS won't wait until November. 

    Are you Thomas Sandgaard's spokesman ?
    Did he tell you that on Twitter ?
    Or is that just your opinion ?


  • swords_aliveswords_alive
    aliwibble said:
    "Chaisty says defendant could come forward with new evidence between now and November to get an injunction lifted."
    Such as the EFL have pulled their finger out and ruled on his appeal? If this goes south, looks like protests at the EFL are certain.
    This is encouraging surely. Show TS is incoming and more evidence as to risks we are under and we move on.
  • ct_addickct_addick
    jacob_CAFC said:
    ct_addick said:
    Does the judge not understand our predicament? Elliot and Chaisty be prepared for a bunch of flowers to be delivered. Ironically my son is at law school but I cannot understand these lawyers defending these con-men and crooks. 

    money

    He wants to get into Cannabis law lol
  • i_b_b_o_r_gi_b_b_o_r_g
    se9addick said:
    If anyone knows Jimmy Hart you should text him and tell him to stop misbehaving - he’s going to get himself into trouble. 
    Genuinely don't think people care mate
  • sammy391sammy391
    edited September 2020
    We’ve lost this one haven’t we
  • blackpool72blackpool72
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Notice there weren't any objections to Farnell being called a c***
    Can't argue with a fact 
  • Chris_from_SidcupChris_from_Sidcup
    blackpool72 said:
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Part of me says we're fucked and TS will walk away if this drags on until November.

    Another part says TS will just say right i'll pay both ESI 1 and 2, a couple of million each to fuck off. 
    Pay them fuck all.
    Let them both drown in a pile of legal fees.
    Ideally we could, but realistically we need them out asap. TS needs to get rid of them sharpish so we can sign players and get going. We can't wait until November, will he even want to wait that long?

    I'm relaxed  for now, as surely TS must've prepared for either side in this case winning.
  • Sponsored links:


  • CAFCsayerCAFCsayer
    Doesn't sound good here
  • cafcpolocafcpolo
    sammy391 said:
    We’ve lost this one haven’t we
    Probably. It's Charlton! 
  • ct_addickct_addick
    edited September 2020
    Sounds like Chaisty took LK to the cleaners.....it does warrant the question whether TS has submitted a written offer?
  • MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    But the worst case scenario is that neither side has won and we may not know who owns us until November!
  • Cafc43v3rCafc43v3r
    golfaddick said:
    ross1 said:
    Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"
    The fecking risk is that club is still under an embargo & so we can't buy any players. Can't Lauren fucking make this point VERY STRONGLY. 
    No.  Its not legally revelent, unless it is because it will decrease the value of the assist.  Which has been stated and excepted as £1.
  • stoneroses19stoneroses19
    Trying to keep up with this, but was LK not able to mention the imminent takeover by TS for a certain reason? Surely if the judge knew that we have a willing buyer who is genuine then an injunction makes no sense for the club. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Leeds_AddickLeeds_Addick
    stoneroses19 said:
    Trying to keep up with this, but was LK not able to mention the imminent takeover by TS for a certain reason? Surely if the judge knew that we have a willing buyer who is genuine then an injunction makes no sense for the club. 
    It wasn't in MM's evidence and she can't bring her own evidence.
  • ProperCharltonProperCharlton
    edited September 2020
    Sadly I think we've lost this. I can't see us surviving until November, so we're relying on someone to pay all these crooks off.

    Makes me sick. I just want to go back to watching us play football.
  • se9addickse9addick
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    But the worst case scenario is that neither side has won and we may not know who owns us until November!
    November was the earliest date that the judge thought the case could be heard, no guarantee it would be then. 
  • roseandcrownroseandcrown
    Wonder if farnell and or Elliot are with boring fucker. He seems to turn and pull faces 
  • swords_aliveswords_alive
    Hartleypete said:
    Trouble is both sides are crooks, alt those saying how great MM was and how he should be offered a job on any new setup must feel bloody stupid.

    The mans an idiot and a liar, please somebody who does twatter tell him.
    He has given evidence that wasn't sufficiently robust. Is that his fault or Kreamer's or someone else's?
  • carly burncarly burn
    stoneroses19 said:
    Trying to keep up with this, but was LK not able to mention the imminent takeover by TS for a certain reason? Surely if the judge knew that we have a willing buyer who is genuine then an injunction makes no sense for the club. 
     But he doesn't really care about the good of the club.

    He is solely concentrated on the claimant and defender.
  • ValleyGaryValleyGary
    Hopefully TS just ups what he was gonna pay slightly, and just splits it down the middle between Elliott and Panorama. 
  • IdleHansIdleHans
    AddicksAddict said:
    ct_addick said:
    Sounds like Chaisty took LK to the cleaners.....it does warrant the question whether TS has submitted a written offer?
    If you read back through this thread, LK took Chaisty to the cleaners.  He waffled and waffled without providing any evidence, she was succinct and pointed out all the facts.

    Agreed, she was excellent. But MM had tied her laces together before the race
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!