He fucked us up because he didn't indicate any consequences regarding what the EFL could do and the threat to the club. In fact he seemed to hint the opposite. The Judge referred to this as giving doubt the club would suffer.
So you think he had free reign in writing that evidence statement and no-one checked it?
Well LK made a point of the inaccuracy so he must have said something she wasn't party to.
He fucked us up because he didn't indicate any consequences regarding what the EFL could do and the threat to the club. In fact he seemed to hint the opposite. The Judge referred to this as giving doubt the club would suffer.
So you think he had free reign in writing that evidence statement and no-one checked it?
Well LK made a point of the inaccuracy so he must have said something she wasn't party to.
That's her job. To make sure the evidence aligns with her arguments, and that's why she apologised.
Mihail has been a liability with conflicting statements. In one statement he has said the club is Elliot's. In another statement he says it isn't. Throughout the afternoon both lawyers have had to issue caveats when using any of Mihail's evidence as it has been shown to be untrustworthy. That said, Nimer has done a bunk and contributed absolutely nothing.
Can anyone enlighten me to why his one inaccurate comment that was then retracted and restated matters.
I presume because it shows him as a poor witness to the judge. Although i find it strange why his 18-page statement didn't rely heavily on the facts that Farnell and Elliott have had countless dodgy deals between them in the past few years.
Mihail has been a liability with conflicting statements. In one statement he has said the club is Elliot's. In another statement he says it isn't. Throughout the afternoon both lawyers have had to issue caveats when using any of Mihail's evidence as it has been shown to be untrustworthy. That said, Nimer has done a bunk and contributed absolutely nothing.
If the supporters trust board member hadn’t defended this application who would have? Why doesn’t Nimer have his own lawyer dealing with it if he is the clubs owner?
Judge says he takes Mihail’s evidence about the threat to the club with a pinch of salt, but having read the rules and regulations from the EFL there has to be at least some risk he is correct.
This match thread isn't a patch on @ross1 ones. Can't tell who's reporting from the court, and who's just sharing their opinion on what may/may not be happening.
Mihail has been a liability with conflicting statements. In one statement he has said the club is Elliot's. In another statement he says it isn't. Throughout the afternoon both lawyers have had to issue caveats when using any of Mihail's evidence as it has been shown to be untrustworthy. That said, Nimer has done a bunk and contributed absolutely nothing.
Thanks. Hadn't picked up on it. Yes, he is in there to protect Nimer's interests and that only regardless of whether it affects the club negatively or not, the club is not his priority.
Is good to be mindful of that when judging his social media act.
Mihail has been a liability with conflicting statements. In one statement he has said the club is Elliot's. In another statement he says it isn't. Throughout the afternoon both lawyers have had to issue caveats when using any of Mihail's evidence as it has been shown to be untrustworthy. That said, Nimer has done a bunk and contributed absolutely nothing.
If the supporters trust board member hadn’t defended this application who would have? Why doesn’t Nimer have his own lawyer dealing with it if he is the clubs owner?
Should be a speedy trial of the issues. Judge says fans will be appalled to hear their club described as a commercial asset. However interests of the club cannot be ignored. Court must have regards to the wider picture.
Judge says fans will be appalled to hear their club described as a commercial asset. However interests of the club cannot be ignored. Court must have regards to the wider picture.
If this goes against us in some form it will be a massive test of TS's resolve in sticking with us because we need a miracle and jesus is not on the subs bench!
Comments
Cheers Chizz, for clearing that up.
That's her job. To make sure the evidence aligns with her arguments, and that's why she apologised.
We're done.
Thanks. Hadn't picked up on it. Yes, he is in there to protect Nimer's interests and that only regardless of whether it affects the club negatively or not, the club is not his priority.
Is good to be mindful of that when judging his social media act.