Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…4950525455…175

Comments

  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,315
    Mihal has fucked us 
  • Gammon
    Gammon Posts: 338
    killerandflash said:
    Gammon said:
    killerandflash said:
    I guess from the judge's point of view, us not being able to strengthen the side before the transfer window closes isn't relevant to this case.
    He does realise the asset is a football ckub
    But the law isn't interested in whether we can out out a decent side against Hull

    IF the club was in genuine danger, that's different of course
    It certainly hurts its value, surely 
  • CharltonKerry
    CharltonKerry Posts: 2,960
    So has an injection been made or not
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,470
    Well thats our club fucked and the existence itself threatened. 

    Elliott needs to remove himself from the country. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,785
    CharltonKerry said:
    So has an injection been made or not
    No decision made yet.
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,736
    Sage said:
    WelshAddick said:
    I feel sick ! 
    As do I.

    I am also shaking, nerves and anger.
    Don't worry.

    You'll just have to wait a wee bit longer before you start work as TS's Technical Director ...
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    Given at how confident some were (including some ITK) I’m surprised that our case wasn’t stronger. 

    God knows what will happen at trial, and God knows when it will actually happen (no guarantee that will be in November). 
  • CharltonKerry
    CharltonKerry Posts: 2,960
    Callumcafc said:
    CharltonKerry said:
    So has an injection been made or not
    No decision made yet.
    Cheers I was wondering why everyone was so upset thought I missed it
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,274
    Chaisty back at it now: Questioning the validity of the supposed "doomsday scenarios"
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,230
    Genuinely forgot we were playing Solidgone said:
    0-1 Addicks


  • Sponsored links:



  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch said:
    Someone just called judge/Chaisty an utter see you next Tuesday.

    Was Chaisty the judge an all then? That's gotta be another conflict of interest
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.
  • Gammon
    Gammon Posts: 338
    swords_alive said:
    Chaisty back at it now: Questioning the validity of the supposed "doomsday scenarios"
    I would just mention that Farnell was around last year at Bury
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,971
    edited September 2020
    We all know a lot more than the judge about that.
    But Chaisty is one dull fuck, doing a relatively minor argument to death
  • CheshireAddick
    CheshireAddick Posts: 1,305
    edited September 2020
    Why isn't Pearce telling him to fuck off, arrogant twat.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    Redrobo said:
    Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.
    Elliott’s lawyer is putting the final nails into our coffin. I think the Judge will grant injunction shortly. 
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,702
    Redrobo said:
    Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.
    Boring fart is back on arguing the judge has to grant an injunction otherwise the trial for damages in November is pointless
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,274
    Not sure if mentioned above, about 10 mins ago-

    Kreamer: Final paragraph of Elliott's 2nd witness statement confirms he is prepared to talk to and negotiate with parties interested in buying the club
  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,726
    I’m hoping the judge recommends a trial for damages but doesn’t grant the injunction. TS buys club and the con men fight it out later 🙏🙏🙏
  • Valleysarr
    Valleysarr Posts: 1,098
    What’s happened. Nothing makes sense 

  • Sponsored links:



  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,971
    And using a false argument to boot
  • ME14addick
    ME14addick Posts: 9,765
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
  • LeaburnForEngland
    LeaburnForEngland Posts: 2,291
    So frustrating the case seems to now be around "no evidence of any imminent sale" when everyone in the world apart from this judge knows we have an imminent sale waiting on this result... 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,439
    ME14addick said:
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
    Yeah quite possibly 
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,003
    Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"
  • SteveKielyCambridge
    SteveKielyCambridge Posts: 219
    Utter disaster. If there is a not going to be a trial until November, then surely that means we cannot be sold until at least November? Nobody in their right mind is going to pay Nimar many millions of pounds to buy the club only to then have to go to court (presumably in the Middle East) to get the money back if the trial decides that Nimar did not own it in the first place.
  • peterreeves
    peterreeves Posts: 1,063
    J BLOCK said:
    Mihal has fucked us 
    Have to agree that it's looking that way... Think he better slink off somewhere as pelters may be coming his way if it goes Pete tong! 
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,702
    ME14addick said:
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
    I think the old man just implied that yes
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,971
    By his logic, there's no evidence I'm going to get knocked off my bike. But I'll still wear a helmet, thanks.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,785
    edited September 2020
    Chaisty argues that because there is no clear evidence submitted of an imminent sale, granting a temporary injuction is unlikely to prevent a sale.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”