Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Mihal has fucked us3
-
killerandflash said:Gammon said:killerandflash said:I guess from the judge's point of view, us not being able to strengthen the side before the transfer window closes isn't relevant to this case.
IF the club was in genuine danger, that's different of course0 -
So has an injection been made or not2
-
Well thats our club fucked and the existence itself threatened.
Elliott needs to remove himself from the country.3 -
CharltonKerry said:So has an injection been made or not1
-
Sage said:
You'll just have to wait a wee bit longer before you start work as TS's Technical Director ...1 -
Given at how confident some were (including some ITK) I’m surprised that our case wasn’t stronger.God knows what will happen at trial, and God knows when it will actually happen (no guarantee that will be in November).2
-
Callumcafc said:CharltonKerry said:So has an injection been made or not1
-
Chaisty back at it now: Questioning the validity of the supposed "doomsday scenarios"0
- Sponsored links:
-
Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch said:Someone just called judge/Chaisty an utter see you next Tuesday.
Was Chaisty the judge an all then? That's gotta be another conflict of interest0 -
Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.1
-
swords_alive said:Chaisty back at it now: Questioning the validity of the supposed "doomsday scenarios"0
-
We all know a lot more than the judge about that.But Chaisty is one dull fuck, doing a relatively minor argument to death1
-
Why isn't Pearce telling him to fuck off, arrogant twat.3
-
Redrobo said:Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.0
-
Not sure if mentioned above, about 10 mins ago-Kreamer: Final paragraph of Elliott's 2nd witness statement confirms he is prepared to talk to and negotiate with parties interested in buying the club0
-
I’m hoping the judge recommends a trial for damages but doesn’t grant the injunction. TS buys club and the con men fight it out later 🙏🙏🙏6
-
What’s happened. Nothing makes sense1
- Sponsored links:
-
And using a false argument to boot
0 -
If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?0
-
So frustrating the case seems to now be around "no evidence of any imminent sale" when everyone in the world apart from this judge knows we have an imminent sale waiting on this result...7
-
ME14addick said:If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?0
-
Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"1
-
Utter disaster. If there is a not going to be a trial until November, then surely that means we cannot be sold until at least November? Nobody in their right mind is going to pay Nimar many millions of pounds to buy the club only to then have to go to court (presumably in the Middle East) to get the money back if the trial decides that Nimar did not own it in the first place.
4 -
J BLOCK said:Mihal has fucked us0
-
ME14addick said:If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?0
-
By his logic, there's no evidence I'm going to get knocked off my bike. But I'll still wear a helmet, thanks.
2 -
Chaisty argues that because there is no clear evidence submitted of an imminent sale, granting a temporary injuction is unlikely to prevent a sale.0
This discussion has been closed.