Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…4546485051…175

Comments

  • Options
    golfaddickgolfaddick
    PeanutsMolloy said:

    Seems to me that, notwithstanding the hours of argument (and waffle) and the £££,£££s of legal costs incurred, the verdict is likely to be precisely that predicted by many here weeks ago.
    Namely that: 
    1. the sale by Panorama to Lex Dom is indeed contingent on the buyer (i.e. owner of LD - currently PE) passing the EFL's OADT
    2. the buyer has the right, under that contract, for its appeal against the EFL's initial rejection to be seen through to the completion.
    Thus the injunction preventing Panorama from selling CAFC to a third party will be granted and take effect until such time as the appeal process is completed. 
    If the appeal is successful then ownership of CAFC will vest with Lex Dom. If it isn't, it stays with Panorama.

    Ball in EFL's court.

    That's my reading of it too. Problem is, who is chairing the appeal & when will it be heard. If it's an independent tribunal  (who seem to take ages just to convene) then we could be fucked.
  • Options
    Richard JRichard J
    stoneroses19 said:
    Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?
    Surely not he acted for multiple parties. A clear conflict of interest. 
  • Options
    ross1ross1
    Obviously we had the late start and then probably two-and-a-half hours of legal representation.
  • Options
    Dazzler21Dazzler21
    Sorry been busy with a sick child today, can anyone enlighten me on what clanger MM dropped?
  • Options
    ChunesChunes
    Didn't hear Chaisty bring up any legal precedent?
  • Options
    i_b_b_o_r_gi_b_b_o_r_g
    Cor, hurry up Lauren ffs


    ;)
  • Options
    stoneroses19stoneroses19
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    stoneroses19 said:
    Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?
    Surely the link is there and it must mean something?
    I agree. It was just a negative thought that popped in to my head. Hopefully the judge will deem it relevant. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    ME14addickME14addick
    ross1 said:
    Obviously we had the late start and then probably two-and-a-half hours of legal representation.
    Time wasting coming back to bite us again.
  • Options
    IdleHansIdleHans
    Now describing the EFL's relevance, albeit currently hypothetical
  • Options
    swords_aliveswords_alive


    Judge is not sure at all if we'll reach a conclusion today. Kreamer concerned that we'll struggle to get everybody back on at a different time. Chaisty/Judge already confirmed they are not free tomorrow morn. #cafc #SaveCAFC
    2
    1
    11

    We're going to plow on for now. Kreamer says she has 15-20 minutes of further argument.
  • Options
    CheshireAddickCheshireAddick
    Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit 
  • Options
    CallumcafcCallumcafc
    CheshireAddick said:
    Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit 
    That's just his face...
  • Options
    MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    edited September 2020
    CheshireAddick said:
    Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit 
    Has Elfs used his spoon yet?
  • Options
    IdleHansIdleHans
    Stating very unlikely that Elliottttt could be approved by the EFL given the wording of their response alongside their rules

  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    LenGloverLenGlover
    Dazzler21 said:
    Sorry been busy with a sick child today, can anyone enlighten me on what clanger MM dropped?
    Technical errors re the Owners and Directors Test in essence.
  • Options
    T_C_ET_C_E
    Someone let me know if cahones appears at farnells with a tray of tea a biscuits. 
  • Options
    RedChaserRedChaser
    CheshireAddick said:
    Looks like Chaisty is desperate for a shit 
    Elfs can offer him some suggestions 😉.
  • Options
    ross1ross1
    Kreamer says Mihael asserts there is a "very real risk" of serious sanctions - including expulsion - being imposed on the club. Mentions Bury. "It is not pie in the sky to state a football club - as a matter of fact - be expelled and cease to exist."
  • Options
    golfaddickgolfaddick
    swords_alive said:


    Judge is not sure at all if we'll reach a conclusion today. Kreamer concerned that we'll struggle to get everybody back on at a different time. Chaisty/Judge already confirmed they are not free tomorrow morn. #cafc #SaveCAFC
    2
    1
    11

    We're going to plow on for now. Kreamer says she has 15-20 minutes of further argument.
    Can't the judge just make up his mind later/overnight & give his decision tomorrow. Does anyone actually have to be there ??
  • Options
    MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    edited September 2020
    It may be telling that ESI2 have not explained why they expect to win the EFL appeal. Surely if it was on a technicality that was easy to remedy, they would refer directly to what that was. The EFL have had loads of time to have heard this. They are a disgrace to the game.
  • Options
    RedroboRedrobo
    We need the wisdom of Solomon. Give them £0.50p
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!