Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…6970727475…175

Comments

  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    MattF said:
    Hear that Farnell took a bit of pasting towards the end, anyone got any quotes on what was said?
    Got called a see you next Tuesday and bet he his wife is going to get a beatin tonight after a line of Charlie. He was apparently still on but on mute. I left so might be more
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    roseandcrown said:
    MattF said:
    Hear that Farnell took a bit of pasting towards the end, anyone got any quotes on what was said?
    Got called a see you next Tuesday and bet he his wife is going to get a beatin tonight after a line of Charlie. He was apparently still on but on mute. I left so might be more
    Yeah I left at that point, I know folk are pissed off but..
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    Valley11 said:
    So there will still be a trial? 
    Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

    I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court
  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,699
    GoOnYouHaddocks said:
    MattF said:
    I had a little pray earlier for the first time in my rabid atheist life, might have to do this more often
    Nooooo, don't go over to the dark side. Remember, correlation does not imply causation.
    Dont remember Yoda saying that....?
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,881
    _MrDick said:
    If I was 30 years younger, I’d be round LK’s dad’s house to ask for her hand in marriage ... what a gal 
    Do it anyway
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,624
    Scoham said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/
    It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....
  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,113
    In the words of the wonderful Idles:

    "Let's seize the day
    All hold hands, chase the pricks away
    Let's seize the day
    All hold hands, chase the pricks away
    You can do it
    You can do it
    Yes you can
    Woo"

    Well done to all those that played a big part in breaking down the first big barrier to a brave new world.  We are stronger collectively than these individual pricks. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    Stig said:
    Sounds like a magnificent job by Lauren Kreamer. Was she picked for the job because she was a Charlton fan or is that coincidental?
    She's a barrister with relevant experience in commercial law and contractual disputes. 

    Obviously that's she's a fan makes her doubly good, but I'm sure they wouldn't have chosen her if she wasn't right for the case
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    Todds_right_hook said:
    _MrDick said:
    If I was 30 years younger, I’d be round LK’s dad’s house to ask for her hand in marriage ... what a gal 
    Do it anyway
    To late my proposal has been accepted. He will have to put an injunction out on me - he better have a good barrister...I have. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,070
    killerandflash said:
    Stig said:
    Sounds like a magnificent job by Lauren Kreamer. Was she picked for the job because she was a Charlton fan or is that coincidental?
    She's a barrister with relevant experience in commercial law and contractual disputes. 

    Obviously that's she's a fan makes her doubly good, but I'm sure they wouldn't have chosen her if she wasn't right for the case
    Pro bono case? So free as well...
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,477
    roseandcrown said:
    Valley11 said:
    So there will still be a trial? 
    Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

    I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court
    What about Southall though?
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,594
    bobmunro said:
    roseandcrown said:
    Valley11 said:
    So there will still be a trial? 
    Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

    I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

    Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

    I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

    1. Farnell out of our club
    2. Farnell out of football
    3. Farnell struck off
    Think he'll be more worried about owing 700k to his 'consortium'.

    Wouldn't put it past Farnell though, he's in tatters post all this.
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    golfaddick said:
    Scoham said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/
    It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....
    “Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”
  • pettgra
    pettgra Posts: 1,572
    Excellent, Lauren you are a star.
    Will this lovely club ever stop trying to get me an ulcer.
  • Fortune 82nd Minute
    Fortune 82nd Minute Posts: 8,337
    bobmunro said:
    roseandcrown said:
    Valley11 said:
    So there will still be a trial? 
    Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

    I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

    Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

    I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

    1. Farnell out of our club
    2. Farnell out of football
    3. Farnell struck off
    Well I'd like a 4th. I'd like to see the bastard put away.
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    It would be nice if we could get a great quote from the trial and have it put up at the top of the covered end with her name on it.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Wouldn't they need grounds for appeal? 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Valleyfan2
    Valleyfan2 Posts: 224
    Brilliant result, well done Lauren. Just a word of caution though, at the consequential hearing tomorrow the judge will consider any application (if there is one) by Elliot for permission to appeal his decision. Costs of appealing would be very high so can’t see Elliot wanting to (or able to) go down that route. 
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    ross1 said:
    golfaddick said:
    Scoham said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/
    It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....
    “Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”

    I very much doubt he will be given leave to appeal - and even if he is, more bad money after bad.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,997
    stonemuse said:
    Definitely delaying tactics being used here ... I believe the judge will see through this and not allow it ... still expect a decision in favour of ESI1 today 
    You should listen to me and stop panicking  :)
  • JoshrewCAFC
    JoshrewCAFC Posts: 916
    carly burn said:
    J BLOCK said:
    Can we do something for her to show our thanks?
    #ThanksLauren

    8pm. Twitter

    For those that didn't see this ^^
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,009
    jacob_CAFC said:
    Another idiot saying something. Called the judge a nonce it seems 
    I hope whoever this was is busy writing a very nice letter of apology to Judge Pearce.
  • Raith_C_Chattonell
    Raith_C_Chattonell Posts: 5,677
    Congratulations Lauren Kreamer, stuck one past those cheating bar stewards tonight eh?
  • fat man on a moped
    fat man on a moped Posts: 932
    edited September 2020
    bobmunro said:
    ross1 said:
    golfaddick said:
    Scoham said:
    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/
    It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....
    “Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”

    I very much doubt he will be given leave to appeal - and even if he is, more bad money after bad.
    Even if he does I assume it doesn't stop Panorama selling in the meantime. Then he would have to fight it out with them which would be no concern of ours anymore.
  • AddickUpNorth
    AddickUpNorth Posts: 8,325
    Fortune 82nd Minute said:
    bobmunro said:
    roseandcrown said:
    Valley11 said:
    So there will still be a trial? 
    Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

    I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

    Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

    I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

    1. Farnell out of our club
    2. Farnell out of football
    3. Farnell struck off
    Well I'd like a 4th. I'd like to see the bastard put away.

    And I’d like to be there when he rocks up to reception........
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,219
    Chunes said:
    Judge said he was absolutely satisfied that Chris Farnell had engaged in a conflict of interests.

    Surely the SRA have got to take notice of that. 

    Let's get the bastard struck off. 
    Absolutely. I wonder if the judges direct quotes about Farnell from today can be sent to the SRA. 
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”