Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Anyone heard from John Burke or that muppet who lost his dream home yet?24
-
He’s most certainly not in this tattersRob7Lee said:
Think he'll be more worried about owing 700k to his 'consortium'.bobmunro said:roseandcrown said:
Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point.Valley11 said:So there will still be a trial?
I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to courtWhere on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.1. Farnell out of our club2. Farnell out of football3. Farnell struck off
Wouldn't put it past Farnell though, he's in tatters post all this.20 -
Needs Lauren's face on thisRedChaser said:
4 -
What a brilliant day for the club and fans alike, and so a new chapter begins.
Might be a new chapter for me if I cannot come up with a decent excuse for my boss as to why I vanished off the face of the earth from 2pm on wards today!10 -
I’m sure @CAFCSayer will be on the case for us.stoneroses19 said:
Absolutely. I wonder if the judges direct quotes about Farnell from today can be sent to the SRA.Chunes said:Judge said he was absolutely satisfied that Chris Farnell had engaged in a conflict of interests.
Surely the SRA have got to take notice of that.
Let's get the bastard struck off.6 -
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it all2 -
Yes there’s a slightly concerning sentence buried in the middle of that article - can anyone elaborate on to what extent Elliott can appeal?golfaddick said:
It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....Scoham said:0 -
Exiled_Addick said:
Yes there’s a slightly concerning sentence buried in the middle of that article - can anyone elaborate on to what extent Elliott can appeal?golfaddick said:
It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....Scoham said:He can only appeal on points of law - it's not a retrial.Costly gamble that I believe he will not take.10 -
I would assume they will focus on getting the proceeds of the sale via court action now. Maybe Nimer will want to get the deal done quick and disappear, crook that he is. It is poetic that these scumbags fight each other, but we can't celebrate until they are all gone.2
-
Surely he's lost it all.i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it all
Even if Elliott wins his trial in November who is going to pay him? He's got no hope of finding Nimer and getting money off him through a court in the UAE.3 - Sponsored links:
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it allUnless it was a loan with a valid agreement with CAFC/ESI 1 for repayment then he's kissed that goodbye.Very kind of you to pay the wages out of your own (yes right) pocket - now fuck off.17 -
I'm not sure whether to believe all this. Strangely, it's not on the official site yet. I know the IT guy isn't on furlough anymore though because there's a report of the Wimbledon game. Couldn't be that MM has come over all shy and embarrassed, could it?4
-
What a superb outcome. Many congratulations to Lauren Kreamer and all those who have fought for our club, either publicly or by investigating and compiling information behind the scenes and to those who have kept it going from within.
Let's not pretend though that Messers Nimer or Mihail provided anything but obstacles to why we got ourselves into this position. They landed us here with a sham acquisition, a shoddy and poorly documented sale agreement and then produced inadequate and inaccurate evidence for the big day. We got over the line because of good advocacy from Ms Kreamer, the fact that in law an injunction is a terrifically high bar because of the potential harm that can result and our fantastic community of supporters which influenced the judge's view on balancing merits.
Let's hope this is a significant step towards supporting a viable, sustainable, charitable, transparent, united and ENJOYABLE football club once again. Please get it done Mr Sandgaard!55 -
MM needs to get the deal done an F off with Nimer now.7
-
Nothing to stop Nimer selling to the turks!?0
-
bobmunro said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it allUnless it was a loan with a valid agreement with CAFC/ESI 1 for repayment then he's kissed that goodbye.Very kind of you to pay the wages out of your own (yes right) pocket - now fuck off.
Talk about icing on the cake. Not only have they been publicly shamed, it's cost them £500k, plus the costs, plus the £50k they were offered to go before.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Surely he's lost it all.i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it all
Even if Elliott wins his trial in November who is going to pay him? He's got no hope of finding Nimer and getting money off him through a court in the UAE.
Don't think Elliotts "net worth" is £400k now "lol"
7 -
See what?JoshrewCAFC said:1 -
Elliot needs permission to appeal. The trial judge can grant permission but if he refuses Elliot would have to apply directly to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal. IF, and it’s a big IF, he got permission to appeal then almost certainly there would be a concurrent application to prevent any sale until the appeal is heard, probably several months. In other words a successful application to appeal could result in effectively an injunction via the back door preventing any sale until the appeal is heard. Bearing in mind the judges words about potential prejudice to Charlton in delaying any sale it is highly unlikely he will grant permission to appeal.7
-
carly burn said:Nothing to stop Nimer selling to the turks!?
Do they have a price agreed or EFL approval?
3 - Sponsored links:
-
Valleyfan2 said:Elliot needs permission to appeal. The trial judge can grant permission but if he refuses Elliot would have to apply directly to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal. IF, and it’s a big IF, he got permission to appeal then almost certainly there would be a concurrent application to prevent any sale until the appeal is heard, probably several months. In other words a successful application to appeal could result in effectively an injunction via the back door preventing any sale until the appeal is heard. Bearing in mind the judges words about potential prejudice to Charlton in delaying any sale it is highly unlikely he will grant permission to appeal.
He wont want to lose more hours of his life listening to that boring bastard droning on.
13 -
Does Thomas?bobmunro said:carly burn said:Nothing to stop Nimer selling to the turks!?
Do they have a price agreed or EFL approval?0 -
Elliott taking this to the Court of Appeal is La La Land. Even if he does. It isn't happening this week. And if it doesn't happen this week, the chances are he is left chasing what he always was... money (albeit in this instance by litigating against a bent sheikh resident in a notoriously difficult jurisdiction to recover funds from).11
-
killerandflash said:
She's a barrister with relevant experience in commercial law and contractual disputes.Stig said:Sounds like a magnificent job by Lauren Kreamer. Was she picked for the job because she was a Charlton fan or is that coincidental?
Obviously that's she's a fan makes her doubly good, but I'm sure they wouldn't have chosen her if she wasn't right for the case
The Charlton fanbase never ceases to amaze. When we're in desperate need somebody with the right skills always steps up and makes a difference.
29 -
bobmunro said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Anyone know this please?i_b_b_o_r_g said:So, will Farnelliott get their £500k back and the £50k fuck off money, or have they lost that too? lol please say they lost it allUnless it was a loan with a valid agreement with CAFC/ESI 1 for repayment then he's kissed that goodbye.Very kind of you to pay the wages out of your own (yes right) pocket - now fuck off.Suggest we erect a statue as a monument to his generosity which helped save the club from administration. Something like this should do
8 -
Yes I do.Chris_from_Sidcup said:Does Lauren post on here?
But don't tell anyone who I am42 -
My price on a yes to both of those would be very, very short.LargeAddick said:
Does Thomas?bobmunro said:carly burn said:Nothing to stop Nimer selling to the turks!?
Do they have a price agreed or EFL approval?
0 -
Honestly can't stop smiling at the thought of Elliott and Farnell out there somewhere feeling shit haha it's brilliant.27
-
Well that's one more Charlton fan that should never have to buy a drink again.
Dare we dream?4 -
Well if there was an agreed price of £1 on the sale documents agreed with some twat in May, I can’t imagine that now we’re a league lower that TS should have to pay more than 5x that amount....LargeAddick said:
Does Thomas?bobmunro said:carly burn said:Nothing to stop Nimer selling to the turks!?
Do they have a price agreed or EFL approval?1
This discussion has been closed.
