Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Charlton to boycott Social Media
Henry Irving
Posts: 85,222
Comments
-
Good on em.4
-
Good. I hope the major sports media outfits do too.0
-
CAST will join this and hope all Charlton fan groups and other individuals will too.5
-
I would never of known that it I hadn't of logged onto he...r...e oh!0
-
I saw Swansea did it only for a full week rather than a dew days recently, was surprised then it wasnt a co-ordinated thing across the leagues at that point else it felt a bit in vain / pointless, so its good its being done on a wider scale
Hell it might have been Swansea doing it which has given everyone the idea
Eg was anyone else honestly aware that they did it for example?0 -
Good to see this and I hope it will be the first of many if they continue to fail to act.I’ll be keeping an eye on promoted tweets over the period though (think there are tools you can use to check) because ultimately the advertising on these platforms is how they make their money. It won’t work if clubs are paying for advertising over the period of boycott.0
-
Fair point. To me it needs a # to get trending during the day so that the falling silent is more obvious.ForeverAddickted said:I saw Swansea did it only for a full week rather than a dew days recently, was surprised then it wasnt a co-ordinated thing across the leagues at that point else it felt a bit in vain / pointless, so its good its being done on a wider scale
Hell it might have been Swansea doing it which has given everyone the idea
Eg was anyone else honestly aware that they did it for example?2 -
Not sure I agree. I might have misinterpreted it but I thought the idea behind the black out was to hit the companies where it hurts i.e. the less users, the less advertising, the less revenue for twitter, insta, facebook.Weegie Addick said:
Fair point. To me it needs a # to get trending during the day so that the falling silent is more obvious.ForeverAddickted said:I saw Swansea did it only for a full week rather than a dew days recently, was surprised then it wasnt a co-ordinated thing across the leagues at that point else it felt a bit in vain / pointless, so its good its being done on a wider scale
Hell it might have been Swansea doing it which has given everyone the idea
Eg was anyone else honestly aware that they did it for example?
If there are no users, no hashtags over the entire sport for a weekend then that's a big dent. I'd have liked the betting sites to join in as they make up a significant proportion of the promoted tweets that I see.0 -
I think we need to be very careful where this will all end. To be clear I am totally against any form of discrimatory abuse we need to be very careful of the end game. The balance with freedom of speech must not be undermined2
-
Freedom of speech != Freedom to abuseredman said:I think we need to be very careful where this will all end. To be clear I am totally against any form of discrimatory abuse we need to be very careful of the end game. The balance with freedom of speech must not be undermined15 - Sponsored links:
-
Leeds_Addick said:
Freedom of speech != Freedom to abuseredman said:I think we need to be very careful where this will all end. To be clear I am totally against any form of discrimatory abuse we need to be very careful of the end game. The balance with freedom of speech must not be undermined
Or freedom from the consequences, which at the moment on the internet there doesn't seem to be any for the scumbags who use it to racially abuse other people.6 -
Futile. Not in favour of this one.1
-
There is no censorship on the internet - you can basically say what you want without fear of repercussions.Jac_52 said:Leeds_Addick said:
Freedom of speech != Freedom to abuseredman said:I think we need to be very careful where this will all end. To be clear I am totally against any form of discrimatory abuse we need to be very careful of the end game. The balance with freedom of speech must not be undermined
Or freedom from the consequences, which at the moment on the internet there doesn't seem to be any for the scumbags who use it to racially abuse other people.0 -
What would you suggest instead? This is not a sarcastic challenge, I am genuinely interested in what people think would be effective.nelsonsleftfoot said:Futile. Not in favour of this one.0 -
This will definitely persuade racist knuckleheads to stop being racist, I can just see them now realising the error of their ways.0
-
Does this mean they won't be showing the Accrington game next Saturday?0
-
No it won't because racist knucklehead are, well, racist knuckleheads.buckshee said:This will definitely persuade racist knuckleheads to stop being racist, I can just see them now realising the error of their ways.
But it might make Twitter, facebook, Instagram etc act a lot quicker and more effectively to delete, ban and so hurt those racist knuckleheads and deny them platforms to abuse others.25 -
NoRudders22 said:Does this mean they won't be showing the Accrington game next Saturday?0 -
I don’t understand this type of thought behind boycotts like this. No one is suggesting it will stop people being racist. But if powerful accounts on social media can highlight that the the social media companies aren’t doing enough to block those racists, then that’s a boycott worth doing.buckshee said:This will definitely persuade racist knuckleheads to stop being racist, I can just see them now realising the error of their ways.14 - Sponsored links:
-
Not quite true.hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
There is no censorship on the internet - you can basically say what you want without fear of repercussions.Jac_52 said:Leeds_Addick said:
Freedom of speech != Freedom to abuseredman said:I think we need to be very careful where this will all end. To be clear I am totally against any form of discrimatory abuse we need to be very careful of the end game. The balance with freedom of speech must not be undermined
Or freedom from the consequences, which at the moment on the internet there doesn't seem to be any for the scumbags who use it to racially abuse other people.
Put up a clip of Premier League football and it is taken down in minutes.
Other people are banned for racism and other abuse, albeit for too slowly and rarely.10 -
preciselystoneroses19 said:
I don’t understand this type of thought behind boycotts like this. No one is suggesting it will stop people being racist. But if powerful accounts on social media can highlight that the the social media companies aren’t doing enough to block those racists, then that’s a boycott worth doing.buckshee said:This will definitely persuade racist knuckleheads to stop being racist, I can just see them now realising the error of their ways.0 -
Honestly didn’t know it was such a big issue. Do anything Charlton players suffer abuse?0
-
Just read the BBC article on the blackout.Algarveaddick said:
What would you suggest instead? This is not a sarcastic challenge, I am genuinely interested in what people think would be effective.nelsonsleftfoot said:Futile. Not in favour of this one.
Liverpool made a comment on the abuse of a couple of thier players.
Would this be the same Liverpool who when one of thier players was found guilty of racial abuse they stood by him.
Even to the extent the next game even all were t shirts in support of the guilty party.
Also took Liverpool years to make the apology to the player who was racially abused.
The abuse on social media does need sorting out, but how about English football sort out the way we deal with abuse in the game aswell.1 -
All true and the same could be said of Leeds but that doesn't mean that social media boycott isn't a good thingclb74 said:
Just read the BBC article on the blackout.Algarveaddick said:
What would you suggest instead? This is not a sarcastic challenge, I am genuinely interested in what people think would be effective.nelsonsleftfoot said:Futile. Not in favour of this one.
Liverpool made a comment on the abuse of a couple of thier players.
Would this be the same Liverpool who when one of thier players was found guilty of racial abuse they stood by him.
Even to the extent the next game even all were t shirts in support of the guilty party.
Also took Liverpool years to make the apology to the player who was racially abused.
The abuse on social media does need sorting out, but how about English football sort out the way we deal with abuse in the game aswell.
as that Jewish bloke said a couple of thousand years ago
"I say unto you that likewise more joy shall be in Heaven over one sinner that repenteth, than over ninety and nine just persons who need no repentance."
Obviously He didn't know there were only 92 clubs in the four divisions but otherwise wise words1 -
They definitely have in the past whilst playing for us, remember when he did, Lyle Taylor was regularly sent banana and monkey emojis. Also Chris Powell swinging on the Sheff Wednesday crossbar at the end of the cup win famously got a very vile response.cafckev said:Honestly didn’t know it was such a big issue. Do anything Charlton players suffer abuse?
I am sure the current lot may have received some but might want to make it worse by daring to complain.3 -
Keep the tap dripping and eventually the dam will burst. I'd far rather they take tentative steps, even if they seem futile than give up on this. The big social media companies need to change, I applaud any actions that reinforce that message.stoneroses19 said:
I don’t understand this type of thought behind boycotts like this. No one is suggesting it will stop people being racist. But if powerful accounts on social media can highlight that the the social media companies aren’t doing enough to block those racists, then that’s a boycott worth doing.buckshee said:This will definitely persuade racist knuckleheads to stop being racist, I can just see them now realising the error of their ways.5 -
Not being on social media I don’t really know what kind of thing such a boycott would signify.
However the issue of racism in my view ought to be high on every agenda, and in the forefront of people’s minds all the time.
If this social media thing helps people reflect on, and eventually stand up to, racism, then I would like to see more and more of this kind of thing.
Anything that diminishes racists even a titchy bit is welcome as far as I am concerned.
Better than passive acceptance.3 -
Why only 4 days and not a complete ban until these companies do something about it? If you really cared you'd remove yourself from the platforms completely. Goes for every single person that uses that shitfest of a site.
People care more about being able to get their entire lifes news from that toxic hellhole than they do about taking a stand.
How many people on here have/would remove themselves indefinitely until something is actually done? Also ask yourself why you haven't already.17 -
Stop spoiling one of the stereotypes that is a cornerstone of every Charlton supporters soul.Big_Bad_World said:Why only 4 days and not a complete ban until these companies do something about it? If you really cared you'd remove yourself from the platforms completely. Goes for every single person that uses that shitfest of a site.
People care more about being able to get their entire lifes news from that toxic hellhole than they do about taking a stand.
How many people on here have/would remove themselves indefinitely until something is actually done? Also ask yourself why you haven't already.3
