Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Steve Gallen
Comments
-
BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
He'd just turned 31 (so not exactly old), had spent his entire career in the top 2 divisions and had played almost 100 times for Wales. He should've been pissing this league.
16 -
Chris_from_Sidcup said:BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
He'd just turned 31 (so not exactly old), had spent his entire career in the top 2 divisions and had played almost 100 times for Wales. He should've been pissing this league.5 -
Chris_from_Sidcup said:BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
He'd just turned 31 (so not exactly old), had spent his entire career in the top 2 divisions and had played almost 100 times for Wales. He should've been pissing this league.1 -
DOUCHER said:james beadle is third choice keeper in first team squad now at charlton, another sidcup boy and he's 16 - we need to build a hungry team of talented youngsters who can move up through the divisions together0
-
Chris_from_Sidcup said:BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
He'd just turned 31 (so not exactly old), had spent his entire career in the top 2 divisions and had played almost 100 times for Wales. He should've been pissing this league.
He was a squad player at Reading playing 20 or so games a season, he’d have been a player doing a job in a decent lower half Championship team.
Putting in 7/8 out of 10 performances in every week in a side going for promotion is very different, he has to offer something on the ball and going forward more than he did in the Championship.0 -
DOUCHER said:james beadle is third choice keeper in first team squad now at charlton, another sidcup boy and he's 16 - we need to build a hungry team of talented youngsters who can move up through the divisions togetherJohnnyH2 said:DOUCHER said:james beadle is third choice keeper in first team squad now at charlton, another sidcup boy and he's 16 - we need to build a hungry team of talented youngsters who can move up through the divisions together
James Beadle must be much lower in the pecking order as Harvey & Osaghae have both made under 23 appearances this season.3 -
clive said:DOUCHER said:james beadle is third choice keeper in first team squad now at charlton, another sidcup boy and he's 16 - we need to build a hungry team of talented youngsters who can move up through the divisions togetherJohnnyH2 said:DOUCHER said:james beadle is third choice keeper in first team squad now at charlton, another sidcup boy and he's 16 - we need to build a hungry team of talented youngsters who can move up through the divisions together
James Beadle must be much lower in the pecking order as Harvey & Osaghae have both made under 23 appearances this season.0 -
How many of those signings looked poor on paper ? I’d argue only Bogle - with no pedigree of scoring goals whatsoever. We were no doubt bargain shopping but even then , I’m convinced we’d have been top 2 if one of Innis and Famewo had played through mid season, whoever was manager.1
-
BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.3
-
RonnieMoore said:BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
No effort, no passion, no interest, no thank you.21 - Sponsored links:
-
Steve’s had one hand tied behind his back for the last 2 transfer windows, I think we need to cut him some slack.9
-
BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
4 -
SurvivaloftheFittest said:RonnieMoore said:BigRedEvil said:In hindsight offering Gunter and Watson 2 year deals to take out a large chunk of the wage cap budget was a poor decision.
No effort, no passion, no interest, no thank you.
Get rid.6 -
Gotta feel for Gallen, been an almost impossible job since he got here. Hurdle after hurdle and yet he has still signed some very good players. Like every scout, he's signed some shite, but that happens at every club let alone under the conditions he's faced. That being said, like Bowyer to some extent in managing the players there was a lot of goodwill and excuses made for the failures. This is his first chance you would feel to really operate with a proper budget and no restraints. That does bring expectation, time to prove his worth.5
-
We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.3
-
ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.0
-
ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
1 -
ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Or GRAS for short
And all four have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are four heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.1 -
Think the manager has to say what players he wants. If Gallen comes up with someone its then down to negotiating the deal, if the player wants too much for our budget then it's the chairmans/owners decision.1
-
Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Or GRAS for short
And all four have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are four heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.
Roddy
Adkins
Gallen
Sandgaard
The clues are all there
we are going from Rags to Riches
ESL 2 has got our name on it.8 - Sponsored links:
-
Nice Breads, Range Rovers and Bitches,
Tommy’s taking us from ESI rags to ESL riches3 -
MrOneLung said:Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Ackworth
Or GRAS for short
And all five have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are five heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.
Roddy
Adkins
Gallen
Sandgaard
Ackworth
The clues are all there
we are going from Rags to Riches
ESL 2 has got our name on it.1 -
Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.0
-
Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Or GRAS for short
And all four have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are four heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.
Adkins
Roddy
Sandgaard
Then have to approve them. With his long experience of U23 football I think Jason Euell should be consulted too, to create the ARSE committee17 -
Chunes said:Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
Why did he say no?
Perhaps the transfer fee or wage demands didn’t seem good value?
Or maybe had another very similar option (DJ or Stockley for example) and went for him instead?
Did he overrule Bowyer, Gallen and Roddy? Or did any of them agree with the decision?
If it has turned out to be a mistake has he learnt from it?
We’ve been under a salary cap under both windows since TS bought the club and made the most of it, so it seems likely it was a decision that resulted in us signing someone else over the player he said no to.
We’ve seen enough to know he’s completely different from RD, we haven’t had a stream of budget players coming over from Denmark and his contacts.
What we haven’t yet seen is how serious he is in the transfer market with plenty of time to plan and no restrictions - that’ll become clear over the next two months.5 -
Scoham said:Chunes said:Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
Why did he say no?
Perhaps the transfer fee or wage demands didn’t seem good value?
Or maybe had another very similar option (DJ or Stockley for example) and went for him instead?
Did he overrule Bowyer, Gallen and Roddy? Or did any of them agree with the decision?
If it has turned out to be a mistake has he learnt from it?
We’ve been under a salary cap under both windows since TS bought the club and made the most of it, so it seems likely it was a decision that resulted in us signing someone else over the player he said no to.
We’ve seen enough to know he’s completely different from RD, we haven’t had a stream of budget players coming over from Denmark and his contacts.
What we haven’t yet seen is how serious he is in the transfer market with plenty of time to plan and no restrictions - that’ll become clear over the next two months.
"Recruitment
TS is building much better recruitment systems based more on information and metrics and more independent of agents.
There is now a team of four consisting of Steve Gallen, Ged Roddy, Nigel Adkins and Thomas Sandgaard.
Who gets the final say? "There are four people involved now, Steve, Ged, Nigel and me" "I'm very involved, I have looked at videos and stats and I've turned people down. We need all four people to agree to a deal." "But Steve Gallen is one of the best negotiators I have met in my life, he's key to getting players and getting good prices when we sell players."
Other people on here were at the meeting so maybe they took it differently
https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/comment/4287855#Comment_42878551 -
killerandflash said:Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Or GRAS for short
And all four have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are four heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.
Adkins
Roddy
Sandgaard
Then have to approve them. With his long experience of U23 football I think Jason Euell should be consulted too, to create the ARSE committee
Steve
Thomas
Adkins
Roddy
and you have the Star Chamber
0 -
The impression I get is that Gallen is a "contacts and contracts" type of guy.
He seems to have good contacts at clubs like Chelsea and Arsenal and seems to get good info on players clubs are prepared to release, and even pay off. Williams, JFC, Page and Inniss wouldn't have signed if their former clubs hadn't "helped" us out.
What we don't have, at the moment, is anyone that has been involved else where in league 1 for the last few years. One of the big advantages Powell had was that he had played against, or with, a lot of the players he signed. At worst he had managed against them in the previous 6 months.0 -
Scoham said:Chunes said:Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
Why did he say no?
Perhaps the transfer fee or wage demands didn’t seem good value?
Or maybe had another very similar option (DJ or Stockley for example) and went for him instead?
Did he overrule Bowyer, Gallen and Roddy? Or did any of them agree with the decision?
If it has turned out to be a mistake has he learnt from it?
We’ve been under a salary cap under both windows since TS bought the club and made the most of it, so it seems likely it was a decision that resulted in us signing someone else over the player he said no to.
We’ve seen enough to know he’s completely different from RD, we haven’t had a stream of budget players coming over from Denmark and his contacts.
What we haven’t yet seen is how serious he is in the transfer market with plenty of time to plan and no restrictions - that’ll become clear over the next two months.
As CL's self-appointed number one Driesen despiser, I can honestly say that Tommy D was more qualified for that job than Tommy S.0 -
Henry Irving said:ShootersHillGuru said:We keep talking as if it’s Gallen alone but I’m confident that Nigel Adkins will have very much his own ideas and list.
GallenRoddyAdkins
Sandgaard
Or GRAS for short
And all four have to agree on a player and that includes Sandgaard who is doing more than just signing the cheques. He said he's watching videos and has said no about at least one player.
So are four heads better than one or do many cooks spoil the broth?
Does it make a difference that they will have a bigger budget, months to prepare and a long term plan based on playing a certain way.
But we know they have already been looking at players and had lists for either division at least a month ago.0