Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Harry Kane
Comments
-
Never agree with players refusing to turn up. But Kane needs to leave as Spurs are just going backwards1
-
If he has refused to turn up then he is effectively 'doing a Lyle'.1
-
Will be a bit awkward if city get grealish for £100m then decide they can't afford another £100m+ for Kane! That's what it says in bbc rumours anyway. As much as people seem to hate levy, he's just doing his job and protecting his clubs asset. Kane signed a contract with no get out clause. A gentleman's agreement is just that, not legally binding. Dunno who kane's agent is, but that was a fuck up on their part. Will be interesting how this plays out, but I imaging the new manager will want it sorted out asap2
-
Kane’s agent is his brother Charlie.YTS1978 said:Will be a bit awkward if city get grealish for £100m then decide they can't afford another £100m+ for Kane! That's what it says in bbc rumours anyway. As much as people seem to hate levy, he's just doing his job and protecting his clubs asset. Kane signed a contract with no get out clause. A gentleman's agreement is just that, not legally binding. Dunno who kane's agent is, but that was a fuck up on their part. Will be interesting how this plays out, but I imaging the new manager will want it sorted out asap1 -
Funny, H wasn't expected back at Spurs lodge until tomorrow based on Covid testing. Have to laugh about Sky engineering something out of nothing.
But anyway. H signed a SIX year deal at £250k + a week only 3 years ago. Levy holds all the aces.
City either meet the asking price or they dont.
They are well aware of what the asking price is, its up to them to meet it.
Kane has been told he can go if the price is met. Lecy is protecting THFC and protecting one of his main assets. Every player at Spurs will always have a price on their heads, its the way our business model works. If City are considering actually paying £100m for Grealish, thats puts the price Spurs want for Kane into context and it certainly isn't unreasonable. But, City would be bonkers paying it as they could probably get Haaland for less.Garrymanilow said:If this is true then I'm glad Kane has done it. Levy apparently told him if he signed a new contract then Spurs would let him go if they continued to fail to win any trophies. Now it's that time and Levy is refusing to honour a gentleman's agreement, most likely because he sees Kane as a nice boy who will get his head down and feel uncomfortable downing tools. Someone really needs to take Levy down a peg or two so I hope Kane's the one to do it
[By the sounds of it, Spurs have got deals all lined up with the money, and they are waiting patiently for City to show them the money. Struggling to see what Levy has done wrong here in all honesty (and trust me, there's nothing more than I like doing is finding fault in him!)]
3 -
Lyle Taylor refused to play nine entire league games of a season during a relegation battle.SuedeAdidas said:If he has refused to turn up then he is effectively 'doing a Lyle'.
Harry Kane has missed a day of training.
There’s quite a difference IMO.14 -
Well there you go then! Didn't know that. Maybe he should have sought better advise when signing his last deal. He'll probably still get the move as no one wants an unhappy player, but it kinda spoils his Spurs "legend" status tbhValleyGary said:
Kane’s agent is his brother Charlie.YTS1978 said:Will be a bit awkward if city get grealish for £100m then decide they can't afford another £100m+ for Kane! That's what it says in bbc rumours anyway. As much as people seem to hate levy, he's just doing his job and protecting his clubs asset. Kane signed a contract with no get out clause. A gentleman's agreement is just that, not legally binding. Dunno who kane's agent is, but that was a fuck up on their part. Will be interesting how this plays out, but I imaging the new manager will want it sorted out asap0 -
I can imagine what Levy has told Kane and what Spurs fans think Levy has told Kane, are two entirely different things.0
-
Levy's model sounds well and good. Until the next time that Kane injures his ankle but this time says that he won't rush back until he is fully recovered.JohnBoyUK said:Funny, H wasn't expected back at Spurs lodge until tomorrow based on Covid testing. Have to laugh about Sky engineering something out of nothing.
But anyway. H signed a SIX year deal at £250k + a week only 3 years ago. Levy holds all the aces.
City either meet the asking price or they dont.
They are well aware of what the asking price is, its up to them to meet it.
Kane has been told he can go if the price is met. Lecy is protecting THFC and protecting one of his main assets. Every player at Spurs will always have a price on their heads, its the way our business model works. If City are considering actually paying £100m for Grealish, thats puts the price Spurs want for Kane into context and it certainly isn't unreasonable. But, City would be bonkers paying it as they could probably get Haaland for less.Garrymanilow said:If this is true then I'm glad Kane has done it. Levy apparently told him if he signed a new contract then Spurs would let him go if they continued to fail to win any trophies. Now it's that time and Levy is refusing to honour a gentleman's agreement, most likely because he sees Kane as a nice boy who will get his head down and feel uncomfortable downing tools. Someone really needs to take Levy down a peg or two so I hope Kane's the one to do it
[By the sounds of it, Spurs have got deals all lined up with the money, and they are waiting patiently for City to show them the money. Struggling to see what Levy has done wrong here in all honesty (and trust me, there's nothing more than I like doing is finding fault in him!)]1 -
I agree with you. I honestly think its time to move him on. As good as he is, his ankles are too fragile.0
- Sponsored links:
-
yup they are his achilles heal9
-
Ok...he's on the road to 'doing a Lyle'cafctom said:
Lyle Taylor refused to play nine entire league games of a season during a relegation battle.SuedeAdidas said:If he has refused to turn up then he is effectively 'doing a Lyle'.
Harry Kane has missed a day of training.
There’s quite a difference IMO.
0 -
England still living rent free in their heads…4
-
Tricky one this & I can see both sides
Kane wants to leave to win trophies & I don't think anyone would begrudge him that at this stage of his career. Levy's argument would be that he can go, but only if his valuation of Kane is met, so he's not refusing to let Kane go, but will only let him go if the deal is right for his football club. I can understand that.
The trouble is with Levy, his valuation of Kane is likely to be ridiculous & another club may not be willing to pay it. Something will have to give as the transfer deadline draws closer0 -
Kane is being too nice. He has well and truly earned the right to get the hell out of that club and move on to better things.
His emotional attachment to Tottenham is now currently an unfortunate set back for him.
Don't be a people pleaser.
A lot of other players just behave like arrogant knobheads and believe the sun shines out of their ass...but some of them end up having successful careers.
Wayne Rooney is a perfect example. The trade off was leaving the club he loves....in order to make the most out of his career and win a lot of trophies. He definitely made the right decision.
0 -
?ValleyGary said:England still living rent free in their heads…0 -
It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.
0 -
See the post above mine.SoundAsa£ said:
?ValleyGary said:England still living rent free in their heads…0 -
Which club owned by a local boy done good should he realistically sign for instead?JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.1 - Sponsored links:
-
Kane, Sterling and Grealish all playing together for a year before the WC would be great.JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.3 -
And fodenValleyGary said:
Kane, Sterling and Grealish all playing together for a year before the WC would be great.JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.3 -
Grealish and Foden really feel like two that could work well together and be on the same wavelength.CAFCsayer said:
And fodenValleyGary said:
Kane, Sterling and Grealish all playing together for a year before the WC would be great.JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.0 -
It’s not a case of me saying there are better alternatives as much as acknowledging how shitty that situation is. What any other club does or doesn’t stand for doesn’t make that any different.se9addick said:
Which club owned by a local boy done good should he realistically sign for instead?JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.Gary makes a good point - it’d be good to see a crop of England internationals together, just won’t be much fun watching the richest team on the planet win all the trophies again. Let alone for the reasons they’re doing it.0 -
There’s a north London team owned by a life long local supporter who are trying for champions league football… oh wait.se9addick said:
Which club owned by a local boy done good should he realistically sign for instead?JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.1 -
JiMMy 85 said:
It’s not a case of me saying there are better alternatives as much as acknowledging how shitty that situation is. What any other club does or doesn’t stand for doesn’t make that any different.se9addick said:
Which club owned by a local boy done good should he realistically sign for instead?JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.Gary makes a good point - it’d be good to see a crop of England internationals together, just won’t be much fun watching the richest team on the planet win all the trophies again. Let alone for the reasons they’re doing it.
That's simply just what the game is now, unfortunately and it sold it's soul quite a while ago. A chunk of Man city fans don't even enjoy it. They've lost interest.
It is still entertaining and relatively special. It will always be great, but something is missing.
Football should improve again, and hopefully the money easy life overly protective always offended digital age boring nonsense side of the game, will hit a decline.2 -
Did Kane have a gun held to his head when he recently signed his multi year £1m a month contract?1
-
It is quite interesting. My father in law is a lifelong City fan and although he still watches them he openly admits he enjoyed it far more and felt more akin to the club when they were a normal club and not winning most gamesDave2l said:JiMMy 85 said:
It’s not a case of me saying there are better alternatives as much as acknowledging how shitty that situation is. What any other club does or doesn’t stand for doesn’t make that any different.se9addick said:
Which club owned by a local boy done good should he realistically sign for instead?JiMMy 85 said:It’s a shame Spurs couldn’t give him a platform to win stuff, I hope he does leave and win some trophies. But for Abu Dhabi, who have won 67% of our domestic trophies since 2018, to be buying Kane and Grealish for £200m is depressing.Gary makes a good point - it’d be good to see a crop of England internationals together, just won’t be much fun watching the richest team on the planet win all the trophies again. Let alone for the reasons they’re doing it.
That's simply just what the game is now, unfortunately and it sold it's soul quite a while ago. A chunk of Man city fans don't even enjoy it. They've lost interest.
It is still entertaining and relatively special. It will always be great, but something is missing.
Football should improve again, and hopefully the money easy life overly protective always offended digital age boring nonsense side of the game, will hit a decline.1 -
No but I think it's been widely reported that a gentleman agreement regarding Kane leaving exists. Kane is pretty down to earth, he's not leaving for money, he's leaving to win trophies, I don't think anyone can begrudge the bloke that. In fact, I've seen very few Spurs fans criticise him which tells me everything I need to know.Addickted said:Did Kane have a gun held to his head when he recently signed his multi year £1m a month contract?5 -
I think you’ll see that change if he goes on strike.cafcfan1990 said:
No but I think it's been widely reported that a gentleman agreement regarding Kane leaving exists. Kane is pretty down to earth, he's not leaving for money, he's leaving to win trophies, I don't think anyone can begrudge the bloke that. In fact, I've seen very few Spurs fans criticise him which tells me everything I need to know.Addickted said:Did Kane have a gun held to his head when he recently signed his multi year £1m a month contract?1
