Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

'Wimpy Charlton' says the Telegraphs Senior Sports Writer

2»

Comments

  • We should sneak some pastel-coloured pencils into his pencil case. That would learn him.
  • Palace are every bit as wimpy as Charlton.
  •  Well I can tell you, if he came anywhere near me I’d punch him right on the …. Ssshhh! Ssshhh ssshhh. He’s coming… What?. Nothing. 
  • Wanker should be hung.

  • Wanker should be hung.

    You don't agree with him ..... ? :astonished:


  • Just another ‘Lazy’ journalist trying the rate teams on how ‘hard’ their fans are … zzzzzzzzzz
  • The Telegraph, you say? 
    Refreshing to see they’ve written an article on something other than “wokeness”
  • Thanks for all the suggestions . . . I must say that my first reaction was up for defending what honour we still have . . . but violence would never be the way.

    In fact if this comment got more publicity then it would definitely work against us image wise - but on the other hand I don't think we should just let it go. I'm all for being smarter than that.

    For a start I've sent the offending article to CAFC Press to see if they can have a quiet word with the egit  . . . but I haven't heard back. Does anyone on here know Rubashow?

    Better ideas would be welcome folks . . .
  • chirpse his doris
  • Sponsored links:


  • chirpse his doris
    like he's got one!
  • It’s the suggestion that the DNA of a club is somehow linked to how ‘hard’ it’s fans are thats just weird …
  • He's the senior sports writer for the telegraph?! 
    The Queen's Park Telegraph and Advertiser
  • I couldn't give a toss what a pseudo Sun journos may think of our club. If they thought anything, I doubt its worth a read.

    He'll soon be as redundant as newspapers are becoming. 
    If you have to write articles like that I think the games over for serious sports columns.

  • He’s right to be honest
    Palace have and always will be bottom off the pile. Universally accepted.
  • ross1 said:
    Surely, it is up to the players to prove him wrong .................. at the moment unfortunately, they are proving him right
    It's not about the players/team, it's about the club and that's why the closeted-palace-twatcicle feels the need to have a jab.
  • m_2 said:

    In an article by Thom Gibbs regarding Premiership clubs 'DNA':

    Crystal Palace

    Supposed DNA

    The team of the 80s (confusing, as they weren’t that good during them) south London and proud, bit fight-y but neither as rough as Millwall nor as wimpy as Charlton. Arguably the ultimate yo-yo club.

    So are we going to let this obviously biased and misled reporter get away with slander on our great club?

    Suggestions please for how we can re-educate him . . .


    Suggestion? Just ignore the fopdoodle. 

    Everyone outside Croydon … and probably most inside … know the facts.  

    They are insignificant, have no relevance on South London tradition and, if anything, should be pitied. 

    If they disappeared tomorrow, very few would actually care.  

    Meh 😑 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!