Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
jonny deep
Comments
-
Of course I do, but that's completely irrelevant to that I was saying - namely, that dismissing the writer of an article because she has an interest in feminism is absurdForeverAddickted said:
Do you not believe that men can be subject to DV then?Leuth said:Oh no, not women who want a fair society!5 -
Believe Johnny. Believe men.3
-
Less than 400 years ago Amber Heard would in all likelihood have been burnt as a witch. I think the male commentators on this thread should take a moment to reflect on how far our gender has progressed over that period and give ourselves a jolly good round of applause.1
-
11 -
Is dismissing a verdict because it doesn't fit your ideological narrative also absurd?Leuth said:
Of course I do, but that's completely irrelevant to that I was saying - namely, that dismissing the writer of an article because she has an interest in feminism is absurdForeverAddickted said:
Do you not believe that men can be subject to DV then?Leuth said:Oh no, not women who want a fair society!
That Grauniad article is further evidence of how low the 'progressive' left have fallen in recent years.
Trump and his 'true-believer' were rightly given pelters for their seeming immunity to facts, evidence, logic and reason; now it appears to be a hallmark of leftist 'progressive' ideology - ignore any evidence which disputes an ideological narrative and double-down no matter how plainly wrong you are....pick the 'right' side and stick to it no matter what the objective reality of the situation. That is truly moronic above all else. Amber Heard is their poster girl, and she is a very apt one indeed as she represents their world view and character to a tee.
The 'victim' in this case was caught out in her lies time and time again and expected the court to believe that the numerous pieces of evidence and testimony which contradicted her self-serving fantasy were all wrong in some way, and that she alone was right.
Entitlement like that is off the scale. The cynical way she has attempted to use the 'me too' movement to garner sympathy and slander her victim (whose life she attempted to destroy) has done the damage to women, not J Depp. Her narcissism and transparent lying about a serious issue will now be at the forefront of all those who are asked to 'believe women'. She has set back their cause considerably, and the fact that she is still doubling down because she can't accept the consequences of her actions makes her an absolute shitstain of a human being, as far as I and many others are concerned.
Defending someone like that is indefensible. Why would the media waste the energy on it when there are lots of genuine victims out there who deserve their support?
I urge you to look at some of the evidence in the case (not the sensationalist musings of the media) and the multiple ways in which she was caught out - often by herself and her big, stupid mouth. Some of it is jaw dropping and at the point of being hilarious. There are literally too many instances to mention and the real irony is all this damage that she has suffered is self-inflicted...
11 -
Well saidbigstemarra said:
Is dismissing a verdict because it doesn't fit your ideological narrative also absurd?Leuth said:
Of course I do, but that's completely irrelevant to that I was saying - namely, that dismissing the writer of an article because she has an interest in feminism is absurdForeverAddickted said:
Do you not believe that men can be subject to DV then?Leuth said:Oh no, not women who want a fair society!
That Grauniad article is further evidence of how low the 'progressive' left have fallen in recent years.
Trump and his 'true-believer' were rightly given pelters for their seeming immunity to facts, evidence, logic and reason; now it appears to be a hallmark of leftist 'progressive' ideology - ignore any evidence which disputes an ideological narrative and double-down no matter how plainly wrong you are....pick the 'right' side and stick to it no matter what the objective reality of the situation. That is truly moronic above all else. Amber Heard is their poster girl, and she is a very apt one indeed as she represents their world view and character to a tee.
The 'victim' in this case was caught out in her lies time and time again and expected the court to believe that the numerous pieces of evidence and testimony which contradicted her self-serving fantasy were all wrong in some way, and that she alone was right.
Entitlement like that is off the scale. The cynical way she has attempted to use the 'me too' movement to garner sympathy and slander her victim (whose life she attempted to destroy) has done the damage to women, not J Depp. Her narcissism and transparent lying about a serious issue will now be at the forefront of all those who are asked to 'believe women'. She has set back their cause considerably, and the fact that she is still doubling down because she can't accept the consequences of her actions makes her an absolute shitstain of a human being, as far as I and many others are concerned.
Defending someone like that is indefensible. Why would the media waste the energy on it when there are lots of genuine victims out there who deserve their support?
I urge you to look at some of the evidence in the case (not the sensationalist musings of the media) and the multiple ways in which she was caught out - often by herself and her big, stupid mouth. Some of it is jaw dropping and at the point of being hilarious. There are literally too many instances to mention and the real irony is all this damage that she has suffered is self-inflicted...3 -
Bigstemmara and Billyboy are the only shitstains here.
0 -
So no constructive argument, just insults.Desperate_Pete said:Bigstemmara and Billyboy are the only shitstains here.
If Amber Heard is the poster girl of the progressive left, then you must be the poster boy - too thick to form an argument based upon facts, logic and the evidence of the case, which is there for all to see.
Facts? Pah! You just know you're right, right?3 -
Won't be wasting any time arguing with a bigoted idiot like you. Facts are plentiful on both sides of this case but you (like others on here sadly) appear to just accept one side..... 'Poster girl of the progressive left' - you are seriously deluded.
Fuck I've wasted time.... Love
1 -
Grow upDesperate_Pete said:Bigstemmara and Billyboy are the only shitstains here.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
There's nothing bigoted in calling out a liar who has been literally caught in lies in court. Her sex is totally beside the point.
5 -
Trial by social media is not the way forward yet sadly that seems to be the way we are heading. Objectivity will eventually disappear at this rate...
1 -
This is Johnny Deep, the porn stat, not Johnny Depp? Just checking.0
-
Facts are plentiful on both sides? As I said, Depp is no angel, but the sheer amount of contradictions and outright lies from Ms Heard, along with her less than convincing testimony and inability to answer straightforward questions meant that the majority of the public, those from the legal profession, and most importantly, the jurors, weren't moronically credulous and were understandably convinced that she was completely full of shit (as she proved by leaving a deposit of such on her marital bed and then denying this and trying to blame it on the dog).Desperate_Pete said:Won't be wasting any time arguing with a bigoted idiot like you. Facts are plentiful on both sides of this case but you (like others on here sadly) appear to just accept one side..... 'Poster girl of the progressive left' - you are seriously deluded.
Fuck I've wasted time.... Love
But, no....they're all idiots and it is only the likes of you and poor, poor Amber that have required intelligence to rise above all that evidence, testimony and stuff and know the real truth.
All hail Desperate Pete, the woke superhero for justice! He's so clever!
Good luck in your next White-Knighting operation, try to pick a more convincing damsel in distress next time, eh?
3 -
bigstemarra said:
Facts are plentiful on both sides? As I said, Depp is no angel, but the sheer amount of contradictions and outright lies from Ms Heard, along with her less than convincing testimony and inability to answer straightforward questions meant that the majority of the public, those from the legal profession, and most importantly, the jurors, weren't moronically credulous and were understandably convinced that she was completely full of shit (as she proved by leaving a deposit of such on her marital bed and then denying this and trying to blame it on the dog).Desperate_Pete said:Won't be wasting any time arguing with a bigoted idiot like you. Facts are plentiful on both sides of this case but you (like others on here sadly) appear to just accept one side..... 'Poster girl of the progressive left' - you are seriously deluded.
Fuck I've wasted time.... Love
But, no....they're all idiots and it is only the likes of you and poor, poor Amber that have required intelligence to rise above all that evidence, testimony and stuff and know the real truth.
All hail Desperate Pete, the woke superhero for justice! He's so clever!
Good luck in your next White-Knighting operation, try to pick a more convincing damsel in distress next time, eh?
11 -
This is such a well constructed point that she is starting to change my views about her and Depp
15 -
WOW0
-
We live in a world of fruitcakes and complete head the balls...1
-
Scissors for fingers > shit for brains2
-
So are you telling me that Jonny Depp doesn't actually have scissors for fingers?
I feel cheated. This is devastating. The lying bastard!3 -
Sponsored links:
-
The reply on that thread of: "Wait till she finds out she isn't entitled to half of the Chocolate Factory..." is fantastic.
6 -
Cuckoo.1
-
Wow.
Mad as a box of frogs0 -
Let all of the poison that lurks in the mud (aka Charlton Life), hatch out. Tiberius if he read this sorry comments section.
0
