Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

FIFA World Cup - Qatar 2022

1…9091939596…173

Comments

  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,488
    He was originally out with an illness so hopefully nothing too serious relating to that. 

    Or it was a cover for whatever else was going on that caused him to head back. 

    Luckily for England in a position that is probably in least need for cover with Trippier, Walker and TAA all there. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,921
    Sad news for him, but he's young enough to hopefully have future tournaments
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,975
    SELR_addicks said:
    He was originally out with an illness so hopefully nothing too serious relating to that. 

    Or it was a cover for whatever else was going on that caused him to head back. 

    Luckily for England in a position that is probably in least need for cover with Trippier, Walker and TAA all there. 
    He was the 'right of 3' back up really though I think so I guess it's maybe Dier that's now cover for.Walker if we play 3 at the back.
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,975
    Find it interesting we've played 20 different players at some point so far.

    Under the old 23 man squad we'd be one player (a centre back probably) away from every outfield player having a game.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,921
    Poor strike by Bielik, he needs Lee Bowyer to make him better again 
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,982
    please shut up, murphy. If you were giving me next week's winning lottery numbers I still couldnt bear hearing your voice
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    So the most realistic chance of Argentina v France is two draws? 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,597
    edited November 2022
    Argentina getting a penalty no doubt

    God the bigger teams are getting some debatable decisions this tournament
  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,443
    Szczęsny has every right to go for that ball. I can't see how that is a penalty?
  • Cafctekkers
    Cafctekkers Posts: 1,255
    That's outrageous that decision

  • Sponsored links:



  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,466
    How on earth is that a penalty?
  • philcafc
    philcafc Posts: 3,890
    Another nonsense VAR decision. Never a pen.
  • Bournemouth Addick
    Bournemouth Addick Posts: 16,284
    Jeez, that's dreadful. Anyone but Messi and he doesn't give that. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,597
    edited November 2022
    JUSTICE... GREAT SAVE - Save of the Tournament that
  • Cafctekkers
    Cafctekkers Posts: 1,255
    Justice! 
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,742
    Not having that.

    Absolute bobbins decision.

    Justice served 
  • Jints
    Jints Posts: 3,498
    Never a pen. Shocking. Glad he missed
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,856
    What a save!!!
  • philcafc
    philcafc Posts: 3,890
    Justice done.
  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,443
    Brilliant save. JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED.

  • Sponsored links:



  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,788
    Justice done.
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,474
    Thank God he saved it - ridiculous penalty.  
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,921
    Great save. Poland need to change something as they're being battered here.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,921
    I wouldn't want to face Poland in a penalty shootout 
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,474
    killerandflash said:
    Great save. Poland need to change something as they're being battered here.
    Very one sided game....
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,701
    edited November 2022
    Didn’t think it was a pen, but had the keeper made contact with Messi with a foot, it would have been given without a doubt.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,817
    Listening to Mark Clattenburg on the US coverage, I can absolutely understand why it was given by the letter of the law.

    There is no difference in the rulebook for arriving late for a tackle with your foot versus arriving late with your hands for a cross. Both times the ball had gone and both times a foul was technically committed.

    An exception needs to be considered in the rulebook for such a situation.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,185
    I had two looks and didn't bother watching the next 50 replays cos Var would never give it ...
    how is that ever a penalty 
  • LawrieAbrahams
    LawrieAbrahams Posts: 3,780
    Worst decision of the tournament. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,817
    edited November 2022
    It looks unusual because it doesn't happen often, there's no frame of reference to compare it to. That's partly why it doesn't *feel* like a penalty, but as mentioned, if the 'keeper had arrived late with a foot instead, it's a clear penalty. Why does the body part make a difference? By the current rules, it doesn't.

Categories

“Marketplace”