Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
RIP House of Commoners group
Comments
-
Can I just throw the word boomer into the thread and see what happens.7
-
cantersaddick said:Can I just throw the word boomer into the thread and see what happens.4
-
KBslittlesis said:cantersaddick said:Can I just throw the word boomer into the thread and see what happens.6
-
0 -
seth plum said:
Crawler 😜😜😘😘🤣🤣0 -
Barm Brack.
Thought you'd appreciate that.0 -
Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.12 -
ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.
However we'd better leave it there and agree to differ.19 -
shine166 said:Overall I think the interactions got better than they had in the past. I presumed it'd been locked for Xmas as mods would be online less... completely missed what triggered the final act.
Personally I think exchanging views is healthy, in a world where our thoughts are pushed a certain way with algorithms.
0 -
The HoC was toxic and there's no other way to describe it.
A bunch of angry people arguing with other angry people about who thought Boris Johnson was the most evil.
It got to the point where it didn't need someone with an opposing view to make them froth at the mouth, just a moderated or balanced view. The irony of people getting upset about being called anti semitic when the ultimate "gotcha" was declaring people racist at every possible turn, is as laughable as it is idiotic.
Having said all that, it probably made those people happy in the short term, even if it fills them with hate against some mythical fascist bogeyman coming to take their first born. If having it there means that it can be insisted that the usual suspects stop doing it on the main forum, let them swim in their hatefilled, angry cesspool.
Misery loves company.8 - Sponsored links:
-
swordfish said:shine166 said:Overall I think the interactions got better than they had in the past. I presumed it'd been locked for Xmas as mods would be online less... completely missed what triggered the final act.
Personally I think exchanging views is healthy, in a world where our thoughts are pushed a certain way with algorithms.
2 -
LenGlover said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.
However we'd better leave it there and agree to differ.4 -
ME14addick said:LenGlover said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.
However we'd better leave it there and agree to differ.
If only there were a forum for such debates...10 -
SporadicAddick said:ME14addick said:LenGlover said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.
However we'd better leave it there and agree to differ.
If only there were a forum for such debates...
If someone is going to make a statement then they need to be able to back it up with facts, the fact that some couldn't do that was a big part of the problem.5 -
seth plum said:Barm Brack.
Thought you'd appreciate that.0 -
I thought I’d start with Curtis Fleming and work my way up.6
-
Huskaris said:The HoC was toxic and there's no other way to describe it.
A bunch of angry people arguing with other angry people about who thought Boris Johnson was the most evil.
It got to the point where it didn't need someone with an opposing view to make them froth at the mouth, just a moderated or balanced view. The irony of people getting upset about being called anti semitic when the ultimate "gotcha" was declaring people racist at every possible turn, is as laughable as it is idiotic.
Having said all that, it probably made those people happy in the short term, even if it fills them with hate against some mythical fascist bogeyman coming to take their first born. If having it there means that it can be insisted that the usual suspects stop doing it on the main forum, let them swim in their hatefilled, angry cesspool.
Misery loves company.9 -
LenGlover said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Chippycafc said:ME14addick said:Algarveaddick said:swordfish said:Algarveaddick said:Those who moaned the loudest were those who wouldn't accept evidence that contradicted their world view, no matter how much it it stacked up.
If people who presented opinion as fact, people who pretended those with an opposing view had said something they clearly hadn't and people who made stuff up to "back up" their opinion had been stopped from doing so, it would have been better.
Sadly they are not used to their opinion being contradicted because of the media they consume (although they often lied about that too).
It was nice to have a platform to contradict the bullshit that many people believe without question. For me, it was never about persuading the entrenched to change their minds, it was about showing the neutral where and why the entrenched were wrong.
I was frequently ridiculed on the Covid threads, but added links to reputable sources to justify my posts.
I can't see why those of us who do enjoy political discussions should be penalised by those whose main aim is to shut down political debate.
Look at the crap i got for supporting Farage but all those wont tune into his show as he dispels their opinion in an instant.
As Nigel Farage was the biggest advocate for leaving the EU and therefore was one of those who sold us those lies, I don't feel inclined to tune into his show.
However we'd better leave it there and agree to differ.8 -
Oh no, the "B word" has surfaced now ....
Front rank ........ FIRE!!!
11 -
It occurred to me while posting the above that this is a perfect opportunity for those of us advocating the re opening of HoC that we can behave like adults and not resort to the type of posts that got it shut down. There are already several flirting with that above. Come on. Let’s make a point.6
- Sponsored links:
-
6 -
This one thread has proved perfectly to me in just 24 hours just how unlikely it is to ever see something like it working and how it’s just not worth the hassle. So now a lot of the usual reprobates have got a bit of political posting or moaning about the other lot out their system, let’s leave it there.23
-
Huskaris said:The HoC was toxic and there's no other way to describe it.
A bunch of angry people arguing with other angry people about who thought Boris Johnson was the most evil.
It got to the point where it didn't need someone with an opposing view to make them froth at the mouth, just a moderated or balanced view. The irony of people getting upset about being called anti semitic when the ultimate "gotcha" was declaring people racist at every possible turn, is as laughable as it is idiotic.
Having said all that, it probably made those people happy in the short term, even if it fills them with hate against some mythical fascist bogeyman coming to take their first born. If having it there means that it can be insisted that the usual suspects stop doing it on the main forum, let them swim in their hatefilled, angry cesspool.
Misery loves company.6 -
seth plum said:MuttleyCAFC said:I don't think there would be grey areas. I can say your views are wrong IMO but I can't call you a fascist or an anti semite or even an idiot or similar word. I can't tell you to stop posting or imply you are a winker like some did to Seth. Just ignore him or disagree him if you don't like what he is saying. Sorry to highlight Seth, I am using him to make a general point.
I have complained twice about being directly called Anti Semitic, the person in question declared they didn’t have to supply any evidence for the accusation, and then repeated the accusation a couple of months later.
My complaint didn’t trouble the moderators, I suspect because my attacker is a well known and long established poster on Charlton life.
The person in question, if they are reading this, knows full well who they are, and anyway the accusation is totally ridiculous.
However that public accusation still rankles big time.
When something like that is allowed to ride (and fester) it is the kind of thing that leads to the Urban Myths, and the wrong assumption that it must be me that got the HoC closed down.2
This discussion has been closed.