Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

I am going to say it!! Yes I am, Nathan Jones......................

1464749515278

Comments

  • Scoham said:
    Jones chose not to sign technical/creative midfielders and wingers though. He purposely filled the squad with defensive battling CMs. It's not surprising we're struggling when the only way we can win games is to defend better, run further and be more aggressive than the opposition.
    That’s definitely a fair criticism. Berry hasn’t been as good as we hoped/expected because he does have that extra bit of quality in the middle of the park. I think having no right wing backs fit has also not helped in terms of supply

    I’m not arguing that it’s been good, and it definitely hasn’t been good to watch. But we were 16th last season, our defence was a complete mess. We are a work in progress, Jones has sorted out the defence but on the ball we are terrible. We’ve gone from one of the worst defences in the league to one of the better ones, maybe he deserves more time to see if he can sort the other side of the game out 
  • It may well be time for NJ to go - but I suspect the real issue is the senior management team which make long term success by any manager well nigh impossible.  
  • Clutching a bit there. 8 points form 6th, 4 from 21st, 10 points from our last 12 games and arguably fortunate with a lot of the points gained prior 

    every club gets injuries, we haven’t been that badly done by on them. No excuse. 

    Jones is an idiot and has to go.
    We had games recently where we had 10+ players unavailable. I don’t think other clubs have had it that bad. Jones and Ramsay are our 2 best players too, and the problem is our replacements for them are nowhere near good enough, and they are players that Jones was stuck with because Scott spent money on them last year 

    We can’t just keep sacking managers at the first sign of bad form

    We've got players back now, maybe nothing will change but I think we’re better off trying to give managers time rather than being a club that sacks a manager at the first sign of bad form. Powell would never have got his 2011/12 season with this kind of attitude 
  • NabySarr said:
    That’s definitely a fair criticism. Berry hasn’t been as good as we hoped/expected because he does have that extra bit of quality in the middle of the park. I think having no right wing backs fit has also not helped in terms of supply

    I’m not arguing that it’s been good, and it definitely hasn’t been good to watch. But we were 16th last season, our defence was a complete mess. We are a work in progress, Jones has sorted out the defence but on the ball we are terrible. We’ve gone from one of the worst defences in the league to one of the better ones, maybe he deserves more time to see if he can sort the other side of the game out 
    the only problem with that is that NJ appears intellectually exhausted and has run out of ideas.
  • All managers get dips in ideas and performance in whatever industry they function - but that is where a good SMT help to revitalise the manager. our current lot have repeatedly demonstrated they have no such ability, and should not be allowed another go on a poor victim.
  • edited December 2024
    NabySarr said:
    We had games recently where we had 10+ players unavailable. I don’t think other clubs have had it that bad. Jones and Ramsay are our 2 best players too, and the problem is our replacements for them are nowhere near good enough, and they are players that Jones was stuck with because Scott spent money on them last year 

    We can’t just keep sacking managers at the first sign of bad form

    We've got players back now, maybe nothing will change but I think we’re better off trying to give managers time rather than being a club that sacks a manager at the first sign of bad form. Powell would never have got his 2011/12 season with this kind of attitude 
    I'm not sure how much of a defense injuries are, either. We have good depth and it wasn't like NJ was forced to play youngsters. For many years we didn't even build a squad by the time the season started. I remember the first game against Sunderland at home and playing with a midfield or Levitt, Oztumer and Vennings. In previous seasons we've been stuck playing the likes of Ness and Josh Davison. 

    By comparison, NJ has been set up for success. A full squad at pre-season and senior cover in practically every position.
  • Chunes said:

    I'm not getting into whether Jones should be sacked or not, but I do think it's flawed to tier the squad as 'top 10 at best' and then use that as the measure for acceptable results. Yes, the squad isn't good enough, but that's largely down to the manager's recruitment decisions. The fact that the squad is limited doesn't automatically make the current performances or results acceptable.

    This squad was assembled on a supposed top 4 budget, so even with recruitment issues, the expectations should be far higher than 'top 10.' Framing it this way feels like mediocrity is being normalised, and the fans frustrations are being dismissed as overreactions when they're totally legitimate.

    Jones is obviously partly to blame here, but I think overall his recruitment has been ok. Small, Ramsay, Godden, Mitchell, Edwards, Mannion are all good signings. Docherty and Ahadme look like terrible buys with their long contracts so there were obviously mistakes made. We need a better recruitment set up, but removing Jones doesn’t achieve that 

    Campbell hasn’t worked at all, but a loan for the player he could have been was probably worth the risk. Easy to say it wasn’t in hindsight but we were potentially signing a championship level player 

    What damages us more is the chunk of the budget spent on Gillesphey, REG, Watson, Aneke and Edun. That’s 5 good wages that could be spent on first team regulars 
  • sm said:
    the only problem with that is that NJ appears intellectually exhausted and has run out of ideas.
    This is a big concern. His press conferences are not a good sign. Shows he hasn’t learnt at all from where it went wrong at Southampton and is probably a big contributor in him already losing most of the fanbase here 
  • Chunes said:
    I'm not sure how much of a defense injuries are, either. We have good depth and it wasn't like NJ was forced to play youngsters. For many years we didn't even build a squad by the time the season started. I remember the first game against Sunderland at home and playing with a midfield or Levitt, Oztumer and Vennings. In previous seasons we've been stuck playing the likes of Ness and Josh Davison. 

    By comparison, NJ has been set up for success. A full squad at pre-season and senior cover in practically every position.
    I’d disagree that we have good depth. We have depth but it isn’t good 
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited December 2024
    NabySarr said:
    Jones is obviously partly to blame here, but I think overall his recruitment has been ok. Small, Ramsay, Godden, Mitchell, Edwards, Mannion are all good signings. Docherty and Ahadme look like terrible buys with their long contracts so there were obviously mistakes made. We need a better recruitment set up, but removing Jones doesn’t achieve that 

    Campbell hasn’t worked at all, but a loan for the player he could have been was probably worth the risk. Easy to say it wasn’t in hindsight but we were potentially signing a championship level player 

    What damages us more is the chunk of the budget spent on Gillesphey, REG, Watson, Aneke and Edun. That’s 5 good wages that could be spent on first team regulars 
    You might be right, but that's still not enough reason to be OK with the performances/results. NJ has been given more to work with than any manager we've had in a good while.
  • Chunes said:
    I'm not sure how much of a defense injuries are, either. We have good depth and it wasn't like NJ was forced to play youngsters. For many years we didn't even build a squad by the time the season started. I remember the first game against Sunderland at home and playing with a midfield or Levitt, Oztumer and Vennings. In previous seasons we've been stuck playing the likes of Ness and Josh Davison. 

    By comparison, NJ has been set up for success. A full squad at pre-season and senior cover in practically every position.
    Quite. Holden was blooding Asiimwe and Anderson and AMB and Kanu at the beginning of last season. He had far, far more defence for being given time and not being sacked at the first sign of poor form than Jones. 

    Very few players go through a full season without missing a few games. Ramsay and Jones have both played well over half our games this season. Their backups are “adequate” senior players and their absence didn’t suddenly change the outcomes , we were shite with them in the team. No excuse. 

    Thats 2 players. Ahadme was out for a bit, he’s terrible anyway. Kanu, but he’s in theory our last choice striker. Mannion, but again the backup was essentially our first choice goalie that the others were dealing with last season.

    injuries not been great but far from a crisis , no defence for Jones your honour
  • Chunes said:
    You might be right, but that's still not enough reason to be OK with the performances/results. NJ has been given more to work with than any manager we've had in a good while.
    I’m definitely not ok with them. But I also don’t think that every time we are not ok with the results the manager should be sacked

    I think there are enough reasons to give Jones at least a few more games now that we have some players back. If things don’t improve then we act before the January window. If we lose and don’t play well on Saturday then I will probably jump into the Jones out camp, but I do think it’s unlikely the owners will sack him yet 
  • edited December 2024
    Quite. Holden was blooding Asiimwe and Anderson and AMB and Kanu at the beginning of last season. He had far, far more defence for being given time and not being sacked at the first sign of poor form than Jones. 

    Very few players go through a full season without missing a few games. Ramsay and Jones have both played well over half our games this season. Their backups are “adequate” senior players and their absence didn’t suddenly change the outcomes , we were shite with them in the team. No excuse. 

    Thats 2 players. Ahadme was out for a bit, he’s terrible anyway. Kanu, but he’s in theory our last choice striker. Mannion, but again the backup was essentially our first choice goalie that the others were dealing with last season.

    injuries not been great but far from a crisis , no defence for Jones your honour
    I’d have given Holden more time too. But he did lose 5 in a row and was in the relegation zone

    When Ramsay and Jones were injured we were just outside the play offs. Their replacements are much worse and is why our defence has looked terrible until Saturday when Jones returned to it. To say their absence didn’t change the outcomes is just silly, we’ve only won 1 game since and it was against bottom of the league 
  • I think it’s silly to suggest it has changed the outcome…

    They both played at Stevenage. They both played at Shrewsbury, which was abysmal and a mirror image of the pathetic win at Burton. Jones played at Bristol R, at the time (since arguably matched) lauded by many as the worst showing in the clubs history. 

    We were fucking dreadful with them in the team, we’re fucking dreadful without. 

    Jones is an idiot. 
    So before the injuries to Jones and Ramsay we were 8th in the table (level with 6th and 4pts off 2nd) with 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses 

    Since they both got injured, up until Jones returned against Lincoln (where we immediately got a clean sheet): we won 1 game, drew 3 and lost 3 

    And you are saying their injuries didn’t change the outcomes!
  • NabySarr said:
    So before the injuries to Jones and Ramsay we were 8th in the table (level with 6th and 4pts off 2nd) with 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses 

    Since they both got injured, up until Jones returned against Lincoln (where we immediately got a clean sheet): we won 1 game, drew 3 and lost 3 

    And you are saying their injuries didn’t change the outcomes!
    Can you bring up some xg stats please.
  • The writing was on the wall. We were already delivering several shocking performances and had stopped fluking good results when both players were fit, available and playing some of which I’ve just listed.

    But I get it, you clearly want Jones to stay. I think you’re bonkers, but everyone is entitled to their opinion! 
    If we lose on Saturday and don’t play well then I’ll join you. But we were doing alright before the injuries, getting clean sheets and winning games. First game with Jones back and we immediately don’t look like conceding. I’d give him a few games now we’ve got players back to prove that wasn’t fluke like you say it was 
  • Sponsored links:


  • NabySarr said:
    We had games recently where we had 10+ players unavailable. I don’t think other clubs have had it that bad. Jones and Ramsay are our 2 best players too, and the problem is our replacements for them are nowhere near good enough, and they are players that Jones was stuck with because Scott spent money on them last year 

    We can’t just keep sacking managers at the first sign of bad form

    We've got players back now, maybe nothing will change but I think we’re better off trying to give managers time rather than being a club that sacks a manager at the first sign of bad form. Powell would never have got his 2011/12 season with this kind of attitude 
    Three of those that are back are strikers yet they still look like they can’t hit a cows arse with a banjo.
  • As much as one or more players, not necessarily the same ones each time but a pattern is starting to emerge, are doing something to the contrary I think there is a good squad in there that if it had the right leadership, both off the field as well as on it, should easily have been in that top six atm and still could, and if it can hold its own there could be knocking on the door for the automatics come April and May. As things stand, however, whichever random permutation of players come out of the hat to surprise us each match day just look as bemused as the rest of us as to what they are supposed to be doing. Somebody needs to take control.
  • As much as one or more players, not necessarily the same ones each time but a pattern is starting to emerge, are doing something to the contrary I think there is a good squad in there that if it had the right leadership, both off the field as well as on it, should easily have been in that top six atm and still could, and if it can hold its own there could be knocking on the door for the automatics come April and May. As things stand, however, whichever random permutation of players come out of the hat to surprise us each match day just look as bemused as the rest of us as to what they are supposed to be doing. Somebody needs to take control.
    Dare i say it, but perhaps a squad that had Dobson and May in it........
  • Meanwhile 



    So. Just found his level? Or de-Charltonised??
  • Jones being out was a big loss, but if we're honest our problem isn't really the defence as we don't concede many and we never get hammered. I think we've only lost by 2 goals once (at Reading), although Bristol Rovers was awful for 70 minutes before we got a couple of goals back.

    So whilst having Jones back in the defence is a plus, it doesn't really address our main issue which is the attack and i don't think they can be addressed without a) a change in tactics and b) new players arriving. We have no creative players and no width, so i'm not sure what you're expecting to suddenly change?

    Even when it was 'working' early on in the season i think we were fairly lucky. Snatching a late win at Wigan, very late winner v Orient, the uninspiring win at Shrewsbury. No one would really class those wins as good performances and the Orient game in particular i remember being pretty poor. Berry got a goal from nowhere but if it had ended 0-0 then we'd have all been saying how dull the game was but obviously getting 3 points glossed over the actual performance. There's only so long a side that creates as little as we do can ride their luck for before the opposition takes a chance or 2 and we get found out, and that's exactly what has happened.

    You could argue that a new manager coming in would (for now) have to work with the same players, but i'd have faith that a new manager would at least address the above issues in January. I don't really have any faith at all that Jones will because his talk of 'not far off being a good side' kind of suggests he doesn't even see the problems that we've all been seeing for ages.
    The change will be that now we can keep clean sheets again, we will start to win some games again. It’s not going to be a massive change in style or tactics, but the results should improve which will buy some time to sort the rest of it out. 

    I’m sure Jones knows that things need to change when we have the ball. The owners will have spoken with him about January and the season so far, and if he wasn’t admitting that then he would be sacked. We were a really poor side that finished 16th last season, we are a work in progress and he’s sorted the defence out but now needs to sort the other side of the game out. We've got half a good team which is probably why he says we’re not far off. He’s built teams before that have scored plenty of goals so I’d give him a bit longer to see if he can do to the attack what he’s done to the defence with a bit more time 
  • I do actually think the defence is fine and the strikers are fine, however we will need to get rid of Aneke and Ahadme at the end of the season. The problem lies with the midfield and Jone's inabillity to see how crap it is and admit the shit he signed for the middle of the park are not good enough. Again as well as not signing wingers.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!