Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Club shop
Comments
-
first charlton kit i had, the one doc is wearing - had the adidas badge and stripes though obviouslyclive said:Two new Charlton Athletic retro shirts will go on sale today!
Both shirts are priced at £45 and go on sale at the below times:
• Online: Available from 12pm on Friday, October 3rd via the official club shop website. Click here from 12pm to purchase yours online!
• In-store: Available from 12pm on Friday, October 3rd at The Valley Superstore
• Bluewater pop-up store: Available from 9am on Saturday, October 4th
https://www.charltonafc.com/news/two-new-retro-shirts-sale-today
0 -
our Alderwood primary school kit, the brown oneElfsborgAddick said:Rothko said:The Admiral brand still very much exists and they do there own retro range
https://admiralsports.com/collections/retro?page=2
The Admiral tops in the 70s and 80s were fantastic. I still think the Coventry tops with Talbot as a sponsor were one of the best of all time. I particularly liked the brown away top.0 -
fenaddick said:
Yes, which is what the club have done previously. I assume that's why we've also been reproducing kits with defunct sponsors (even if someone technically owns it as pointed out above. Barclays are highly unlikely to sue us for us of a logo they would never use anyway)ElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
CorrectElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
No you’ve completely missed the point. Man Utd could do it if they wanted because Adidas make their kits. We can’t because Reebok make ours, not AdidasElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
That isn't official Man Utd stuff and even if it was their current contract is Adidas anyway so the 3 stripes wouldn't be an issueElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Presumably Adidas are involved in that. I haven't checked but might be clubs that are currently supplied by them.ElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Adidas wouldn't be best pleased. Obviously doesn't stop knock offs like red robins retro doing it but not something the club would want to try.ElfsborgAddick said:shine166 said:Yeah these 2 look like temu knockoffs, 2 stripes instead of 3 is a bovvy market special.I am glad you have mentioned that, I thought it was only me. I didn't buy them when they came out last time because of this, I would have bought both home and away last time if they were the 'proper' retro.For the life of me I do not know why the full amount of stripes are not used.
Other clubs produce the Adidas retro with the correct amount of stripes, so why can't we? A shame.This has the correct amount of stripes but may be a snide.
So have I read your post correctly, in that we should be able to produce the full amount of stripes?Aha, thank you.So then it comes down to a copyright issue, thus the lack of all the stripes?Again, thank you.Am I right in thinking that if a kit manufacturer no longer exists then you can produce the exact one again?
Thank you very much Mr Google, have a nice weekend.
1 -
It's recognition that Docherty is the new Johan CruyffElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
No you’ve completely missed the point. Man Utd could do it if they wanted because Adidas make their kits. We can’t because Reebok make ours, not AdidasElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
That isn't official Man Utd stuff and even if it was their current contract is Adidas anyway so the 3 stripes wouldn't be an issueElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Presumably Adidas are involved in that. I haven't checked but might be clubs that are currently supplied by them.ElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Adidas wouldn't be best pleased. Obviously doesn't stop knock offs like red robins retro doing it but not something the club would want to try.ElfsborgAddick said:shine166 said:Yeah these 2 look like temu knockoffs, 2 stripes instead of 3 is a bovvy market special.I am glad you have mentioned that, I thought it was only me. I didn't buy them when they came out last time because of this, I would have bought both home and away last time if they were the 'proper' retro.For the life of me I do not know why the full amount of stripes are not used.
Other clubs produce the Adidas retro with the correct amount of stripes, so why can't we? A shame.This has the correct amount of stripes but may be a snide.
So have I read your post correctly, in that we should be able to produce the full amount of stripes?Aha, thank you.So then it comes down to a copyright issue, thus the lack of all the stripes?1 -
Henry Irving said:
It's recognition that Docherty is the new Johan CruyffElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
No you’ve completely missed the point. Man Utd could do it if they wanted because Adidas make their kits. We can’t because Reebok make ours, not AdidasElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
That isn't official Man Utd stuff and even if it was their current contract is Adidas anyway so the 3 stripes wouldn't be an issueElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Presumably Adidas are involved in that. I haven't checked but might be clubs that are currently supplied by them.ElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Adidas wouldn't be best pleased. Obviously doesn't stop knock offs like red robins retro doing it but not something the club would want to try.ElfsborgAddick said:shine166 said:Yeah these 2 look like temu knockoffs, 2 stripes instead of 3 is a bovvy market special.I am glad you have mentioned that, I thought it was only me. I didn't buy them when they came out last time because of this, I would have bought both home and away last time if they were the 'proper' retro.For the life of me I do not know why the full amount of stripes are not used.
Other clubs produce the Adidas retro with the correct amount of stripes, so why can't we? A shame.This has the correct amount of stripes but may be a snide.
So have I read your post correctly, in that we should be able to produce the full amount of stripes?Aha, thank you.So then it comes down to a copyright issue, thus the lack of all the stripes?
oooossh, he takes me back. What a player he was.
1 -
…on par with Allan Simonson and Dick Tydeman.ElfsborgAddick said:Henry Irving said:
It's recognition that Docherty is the new Johan CruyffElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
No you’ve completely missed the point. Man Utd could do it if they wanted because Adidas make their kits. We can’t because Reebok make ours, not AdidasElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
That isn't official Man Utd stuff and even if it was their current contract is Adidas anyway so the 3 stripes wouldn't be an issueElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Presumably Adidas are involved in that. I haven't checked but might be clubs that are currently supplied by them.ElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Adidas wouldn't be best pleased. Obviously doesn't stop knock offs like red robins retro doing it but not something the club would want to try.ElfsborgAddick said:shine166 said:Yeah these 2 look like temu knockoffs, 2 stripes instead of 3 is a bovvy market special.I am glad you have mentioned that, I thought it was only me. I didn't buy them when they came out last time because of this, I would have bought both home and away last time if they were the 'proper' retro.For the life of me I do not know why the full amount of stripes are not used.
Other clubs produce the Adidas retro with the correct amount of stripes, so why can't we? A shame.This has the correct amount of stripes but may be a snide.
So have I read your post correctly, in that we should be able to produce the full amount of stripes?Aha, thank you.So then it comes down to a copyright issue, thus the lack of all the stripes?
oooossh, he takes me back. What a player he was.2 -
Particularly Mr Tydeman.Solidgone said:
…on par with Allan Simonson and Dick Tydeman.ElfsborgAddick said:Henry Irving said:
It's recognition that Docherty is the new Johan CruyffElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
No you’ve completely missed the point. Man Utd could do it if they wanted because Adidas make their kits. We can’t because Reebok make ours, not AdidasElfsborgAddick said:fenaddick said:
That isn't official Man Utd stuff and even if it was their current contract is Adidas anyway so the 3 stripes wouldn't be an issueElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Presumably Adidas are involved in that. I haven't checked but might be clubs that are currently supplied by them.ElfsborgAddick said:Talal said:
Adidas wouldn't be best pleased. Obviously doesn't stop knock offs like red robins retro doing it but not something the club would want to try.ElfsborgAddick said:shine166 said:Yeah these 2 look like temu knockoffs, 2 stripes instead of 3 is a bovvy market special.I am glad you have mentioned that, I thought it was only me. I didn't buy them when they came out last time because of this, I would have bought both home and away last time if they were the 'proper' retro.For the life of me I do not know why the full amount of stripes are not used.
Other clubs produce the Adidas retro with the correct amount of stripes, so why can't we? A shame.This has the correct amount of stripes but may be a snide.
So have I read your post correctly, in that we should be able to produce the full amount of stripes?Aha, thank you.So then it comes down to a copyright issue, thus the lack of all the stripes?
oooossh, he takes me back. What a player he was.1 -
great news it's been a success and sounds like it'll be around for xmas2
-
2 parts of the year where a football club shop makes more money than normal
When the new kits come out in pre season and
The weeks leading up to Christmas
To close down a store in a busy shopping centre as in Bluewater 2 months before Santa Claus arrives and then not reopen one elsewhere would have been a business owners own goal.
Common sense tells you when the shop opened in Bluewater back in June, that it has be to kept open in one shape or form until the new year.0
