Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Should we play our strongest team against Chelsea?

1235»

Comments

  • CombeMartin
    CombeMartin Posts: 101
    So what your saying is we should have played the subs bench plus a few kids and lost about 10-0 on worldwide TV.
  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,925
    CombeMartin said:
    So what your saying is we should have played the subs bench plus a few kids and lost about 10-0 on worldwide TV.
    Has anyone actually said that?
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,504
    We should have protected the main players liable for injury 
    leaburn
    Bell
    Bree 
    jones 

    I can live with losing 0-10 if we increase our chances of staying up 
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 11,356
    oohaahmortimer said:
    We should have protected the main players liable for injury 
    leaburn
    Bell
    Bree 
    jones 

    I can live with losing 0-10 if we increase our chances of staying up 

    And then Bell's hamstring goes against Sheff Utd instead?

    It would have gone eventually. The others came through fine.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,398
    I'm sticking to my guns. Jones was 100% correct to play our first team against Chelsea. People paid a lot of money to see that game, thousands more turned up to watch that than watch the normal league  offering. It was a very important game. Carefully nurtured, some of those extra thousands might start coming along more regularly, rip them off and they will walk away.  
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 25,082
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,278
    Bedsaddick said:
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
    I said that only tomorrow
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 3,176
    CombeMartin said:
    So what your saying is we should have played the subs bench plus a few kids and lost about 10-0 on worldwide TV.
    Yes if it helps keep us in the Championship, was getting a 5-1 thrashing of the first team a better advert then.
    It was Humiliating, that is not much fun.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,504
    DamoNorthStand said:
    oohaahmortimer said:
    We should have protected the main players liable for injury 
    leaburn
    Bell
    Bree 
    jones 

    I can live with losing 0-10 if we increase our chances of staying up 

    And then Bell's hamstring goes against Sheff Utd instead?

    It would have gone eventually. The others came through fine.
    and his 60 mins may have contributed to a point as opposed to the 1-5 defeat
  • CombeMartin
    CombeMartin Posts: 101
    superclive98 said:
    CombeMartin said:
    So what your saying is we should have played the subs bench plus a few kids and lost about 10-0 on worldwide TV.
    Has anyone actually said that?
    No not in as many words, but that's what's inferred

Categories

“Marketplace”