Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD : Charlton Athletic V Ipswich Town : Wednesday 22nd April 2026 : KO 19:45

1356735

Comments

  • Rossman92
    Rossman92 Posts: 3,792
    Lineup has the makings for an absolute batshit crazy night 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 18,279
    edited April 22
    And people say NJ has no Plan B... He's far beyond that. This must be Plan X. 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 14,315
    I get it. The players have been poor recently and a shake-up is needed. Mannion has made two comedy errors under no pressure and we have a keeper on the bench who is vastly more experienced at a higher level. Burke looked poor against Weds and Sichenje looked great. Fevrier had to come in for Clarke so it makes sense to put a very capable LWB across from him and Chambers' form has got worse recently. Gillesphey tends to show up when we need him and he's much better with Bell there. Carey has been diabolical for weeks and deserves to be dropped and Dykes hasn't been great the past few weeks. Kelman and TC started off the season together and they were absolute monsters at pressing, which is what Jones will want from them tonight. The only surprise is Coventry in for Coady, I imagine because having JRC and Coady both would be too little running in the middle
  • timken
    timken Posts: 1,110
    Bang goes our three goal, goal difference superiority over Oxford. 


    Completely irrelevant now.
    Famous last words.
    Goal difference is mathematically irrelevant as only way we go down is if we lose 3 and oxford win two.3   1-0 defeats and oxford 2 1-0 ictories send us down so 5-0 is no worse as far as that is concernef
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,776
    edited April 22
    Brown59 said:
    Dreadful line up. We are only  3 goals better than Oxford. That will be gone tonight. Playing for a draw is not the way.  We look defeated with that line up. 
    If Oxford win their remaining two games and we lose ours we'd be worse off on goal difference regardless. We'd drop by three, they'd increase by two (at a minimum)--meaning we'd drop to -15 (again, at a minimum) and they'd increase to -13. So goal difference isn't relevant. 
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,181
    Bang goes our three goal, goal difference superiority over Oxford. 


    Goal difference a total non consideration. The only way it comes into play is if we lose our next 3 and Oxford win their next 2. In which case, their GD is better by default.
  • fenlandaddick
    fenlandaddick Posts: 2,103
    Southbank said:
    Christ. NJ must have written this game off from the get go.
    Cant imagine Ipswich have prepared for that line up😂

    neither have I ..... 🤣
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,571
    edited April 22
    Looks like the lopsided 532/433 that got us promoted.

    Fevrier up against their talented winger looks a mismatch, but it’s kind of necessitated by Ramsay and Clarke being unavailable. Despite that, I don’t mind it.

    Gilly has been okay this season with a proper left back next to him, which he’ll have tonight in Bell.

    When we have the ball, expect Fevrier to push high and Collins to shift right to cover the right back area. Also Campbell to shift left. A lot of responsibility on JRC to get into the box and support Kelman. Wouldn’t have minded seeing Knibbs get another chance there as Carey has faded and looked a bit tired recently, but get why Jones would opt for a player with a bit more defensive instincts. I like Coventry on there too - he’s not everyone’s cup of tea but when we’ve played well this season and moved the ball effectively through the lines, he’s had a good game an played a role in us doing that. 

    It’s a system that worked well for us last year and earlier this season before we got bogged down with injuries and patchy form mid season.

    The question will be, can we get on the ball often enough and long enough to transition into the more attacking shape. Might be tough, but the pressure is off a little bit tonight because no one fancies us and we just need a point to complete the one and only mission for this season. It’s nights like this we have a habit pulling something out of thin air. If we can start aggressive and get our press going at its best, there’s a slim chance we can do something here. I’m actually a bit more hopeful of it having seen the starting line up. 
  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 5,328
    Bang goes our three goal, goal difference superiority over Oxford. 


    Completely irrelevant now.
    Famous last words.
    Hadn't factored in the Blackburn ending on 50 points scenario, so maybe not irrelevant after all!!
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,582
    Bang goes our three goal, goal difference superiority over Oxford. 


    Completely irrelevant now.
    Famous last words.
    No, it is irrelevant... To catch us they have to win l of their games and we have to lose all of ours. If we lose and they win every game the swing is made up regardless of the score

  • Sponsored links:



  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,774
    When you're playing a mid week match in FM and see everyone at 80% fitness so feel forced to change most of your team.
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 13,484
    Let's be honest, there's barely a week go by without a "WTF" comment about team selection.

    "WTF TC starting"

    "WTF TC on the bench"

    Etc etc.

    In Rev Jones we trust.
  • Brown59 said:
    Dreadful line up. We are only  3 goals better than Oxford. That will be gone tonight. Playing for a draw is not the way.  We look defeated with that line up. 
    GD is irrelevant so far as Oxford are concerned. Could still come into play with Blackburn, though.
  • Playing Ipswich on a glorious sunny spring night brings back memories of 1998.

    Forget the Doncaster or Wycombe games, that Ipswich play- off game was the noisiest I have ever heard the Valley. The roar was absolutely defeaning as the teams came out.

    Grateful if those there tonight could recreate the same atmosphere!
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,902
    fenaddick said:
    Some comments from the last time we had a really unexpected line up against a top end team (Boro)

    Was quite looking forward to this but can't see anything other than a defeat now. Sorry to be negative and obviously hope I'm wrong.

    Scary defence.

    Looks like Jones is writing this one off. 

    Treating it like a 1st round cup tie against Cray Valley.

    Personally think they’ll run right through us but more than happy to be proven wrong. 

    Ridiclous lineup that wtf

    This could end up a cricket score. 
    True Dat. 
  • usetobunkin
    usetobunkin Posts: 2,432
    Let us meet with triumph and disaster and treat the two impostors just the same. 
    Either genius or his application for the Spurs job 
  • Orpingtony
    Orpingtony Posts: 323
    edited April 22
    I don't see any players dropped who don't deserve it. Except Godden,  and 3 games in a week would be asking too much 
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 13,484
    I get it. The players have been poor recently and a shake-up is needed. Mannion has made two comedy errors under no pressure and we have a keeper on the bench who is vastly more experienced at a higher level. Burke looked poor against Weds and Sichenje looked great. Fevrier had to come in for Clarke so it makes sense to put a very capable LWB across from him and Chambers' form has got worse recently. Gillesphey tends to show up when we need him and he's much better with Bell there. Carey has been diabolical for weeks and deserves to be dropped and Dykes hasn't been great the past few weeks. Kelman and TC started off the season together and they were absolute monsters at pressing, which is what Jones will want from them tonight. The only surprise is Coventry in for Coady, I imagine because having JRC and Coady both would be too little running in the middle
    Will you please take your logical and valid points somewhere else please?

    This is the thread for people to spit feathers ...
  • peterreeves
    peterreeves Posts: 1,179
    Is it too late for a tenner at 66/1?

    Omg what is that line up... Me and my daughter are just looking at each other dumbfounded.

    Surely Jones can't be thinking I'll write this off and save the team for Saturday?

    Nevermind we will just nod our heads and bow to the Nathan's superior knowledge...

    Let us pray! 
  • raytreacy
    raytreacy Posts: 244
    Great line up Nathan. 0-3 to Ipswich.

  • Sponsored links:



  • boggzy
    boggzy Posts: 3,772
    So nice to not have Carey and Dykes (and obviously Burke) starting, that's for sure.
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 13,484
    And right on cue:

    Money For Nothing by Dire Straits on the PA.

    Golfie's boy's satirical comment about the form of some of our players lately.
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 27,553
    Macca and Bell. I hope neither of them is starting at wing-back. Is Jones writing this one off?
  • jose
    jose Posts: 1,218
    Eight changes.
    Team picked to piss off Millwall
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 71,726
    Not the lineup i was expecting,  but I'm not horrified by it either. I need to see where everyone plays first.

    Looks like we've gone with a number of players who can press the opposition, so maybe that's the tactic,  rather than parking the bus 
  • fenlandaddick
    fenlandaddick Posts: 2,103
    Macca the Wembley Final hero. So glad with our depth of squad we only need him out for the really big games.
    I think he'll play a corker again.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,743
    Good Lord…that lineup is, interesting.

    In Jones we trust (for at least the first 10 minutes!).
  • Beckboy
    Beckboy Posts: 1,855
    Free kick macca 1 nil win
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,743
    Beckboy said:
    Free kick macca 1 nil win
    Ridiculous, that would never happen in a big match. Absolutely vile thought. 
  • Addickted2U
    Addickted2U Posts: 3,205
    It's the Charlton way that we end up with a 1-0 win with this line-up. 🤪
This discussion has been closed.