Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent Cricket 2026
Comments
-
And what a start from Matt Milnes !!!!!
Great stuff !2 -
Did that one for Zak!Fanny Fanackapan said:And what a start from Matt Milnes !!!!!
Great stuff !2 -
Ekansh gets Lees LBW for 31. Durham 56/24
-
Another for Ekansh. Rhodes caught by Dudgeon for 19. 65/35
-
Dudgeon gets in on the act. Clark caught behind for 5. 88/44
-
Could do with getting Beddingham out. He’s raced to 51* from just 36 balls. 121/43
-
Keep the faith .fenaddick said:Could do with getting Beddingham out. He’s raced to 51* from just 36 balls. 121/4
Looks like Stokes didn't fancy facing our rampant boys so "suggested" Robinson moved up the order ....3 -
Parky and Muyeye bowling to boost the over rate means we have lost that little grip we had earlier in the innings.1
-
159~5 [38].
Milnes wicket.
Stokes in.
Trail by 364.3 -
173~5 [41.3].
Off because of bad light.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Not been following, so hadn't realised that Ben McKinney was subbed off, hence Rhodes batting instead.0
-
That little spell of Muyeye and Parky was because of the light. I understand the umpires told Kent that if they brought the seamers back at that point, they would have to go off. The light improved a little after about 6 overs, enabling Milnes etc to have another go.LenGlover said:Parky and Muyeye bowling to boost the over rate means we have lost that little grip we had earlier in the innings.The over rate has been poor by both teams, but other than that it was a good day for Kent.4 -
Rain delaying play. Pitch inspection at noon0
-
Don't look at me !fenaddick said:Rain delaying play. Pitch inspection at noon8 -
High scoring game in Bristol
Gloucs 154 and 38-5, Northants 1273 -
No restart at Beckenham. Early lunch being taken at 12.30.1
-
What's going on on Beckenham ? No news seemingly available ..
Play all morning at Lords ....1 -
Further delay at Beckenham, with another inspection at 2pm.
Wet outfield.
1 -
Hmmm.Peter_G said:Further delay at Beckenham, with another inspection at 2pm.
Wet outfield.
Thinking BS might have deployed the "JJ method" of ensuring play was delayed/cancelled even.....He REALLY hasn't enjoyed his latest visit to Kent thus far!
Remember that a few seasons ago, Addicks ?3 -
Yet another delay. Further inspection at 3pm.
It must have been very localised heavy rain.
When we left the ground at about 5.45 yesterday it was just spitting with rain, and we have had some light showers overnight here in Farnborough, but my back lawn is perfectly playable.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
Conspiracy theory abounds ....Peter_G said:Yet another delay. Further inspection at 3pm.
It must have been very localised heavy rain.
When we left the ground at about 5.45 yesterday it was just spitting with rain, and we have had some light showers overnight here in Farnborough, but my back lawn is perfectly playable.1 -
Glorious weather but no cricket. Water got under the covers and there’s a damp patch right on a length. @TimesSport pic.twitter.com/fwdW5AwMt4
— Elizabeth Ammon (@legsidelizzy) May 17, 2026
Some explanation
https://x.com/legsidelizzy/status/2055978157971308621?s=20
0 -
Very poor, especially as we're winning 1
-
Bet this wouldn't have been the case at Canterbury.fenaddick said:Glorious weather but no cricket. Water got under the covers and there’s a damp patch right on a length. @TimesSport pic.twitter.com/fwdW5AwMt4
— Elizabeth Ammon (@legsidelizzy) May 17, 2026
Some explanation
https://x.com/legsidelizzy/status/2055978157971308621?s=20
Makes me wonder if the choice of a home 4 dayer elsewhere was sensible....
Really unhappy with this current situation & expect the home dressing room is a gloomy one.
2 -
This is so poor. All the other CC games are seeing plenty of cricket this afternoon, and that should be the case at Beckenham, but allowing rain to get in under the covers has jeopardised the result, and will have significantly reduced takings. Shambles.2
-
Plenty of red ball games take place there though, youth games, touring parties etc, it's not a "park" setup with an amateur groundsman.Fanny Fanackapan said:
Bet this wouldn't have been the case at Canterbury.fenaddick said:Glorious weather but no cricket. Water got under the covers and there’s a damp patch right on a length. @TimesSport pic.twitter.com/fwdW5AwMt4
— Elizabeth Ammon (@legsidelizzy) May 17, 2026
Some explanation
https://x.com/legsidelizzy/status/2055978157971308621?s=20
Makes me wonder if the choice of a home 4 dayer elsewhere was sensible....
Really unhappy with this current situation & expect the home dressing room is a gloomy one.0 -
BBC sports online now stating " Close of play "
What a waste of a day.3 -
🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺0
-
When Surrey play women's games there they provide additional ground staff.
There is a slope which probably caused the problem with the covers.
Getting Tunbridge Wells back up to county standard should be speeded up.5 -
Yes please !!!!!Crusty54 said:When Surrey play women's games there they provide additional ground staff.
There is a slope which probably caused the problem with the covers.
Getting Tunbridge Wells back up to county standard should be speeded up.0
