Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England v Norway
Comments
-
Got his leg in front, yes. Then got bundled over so it's a foul.
And I still think Kane was fouled for their goal, by the way.
VAR is either shit or corrupt.9 -
We cannot buy a decision recently.The Anderson one was clear cut1
-
Anyone smelling the stench of corruption?1
-
Why out of interest?SporadicAddick said:Can we please stop with the corruption bollocks.
A shit decision maybe.4 -
It’s called drawing the foul and is totally legitimate.sam3110 said:Never a pen, Spence looking for it like me looking for my house keys when my wife has "tidied up"10 -
exceptional game management so far
2 -
The way Spence threw his leg out to his right, looked for contact then snapped his legs back together as he threw himself forward? You'd all be spitting blood if someone like Neymar or Ronaldo done that in a game against us, honestly10
-
Why would anything be corrupt against England?
I thought it was fixed so the bigger teams stay in the tournament?
if that’s the case then surely the corruption is in our favour?1 -
youy inbly get those fouls if your name is messi0
-
Honestly, if that Spence one was the other way around I’d have no complaints.
2 -
Sponsored links:
-
robroy said:That’s a pen, all day long. He’s got in front of his man with the standing leg and taken down.It’s corrupt boys and girls.
These two posts in a row kind of show up the “corruption” theory for me. When you even have England fans thinking it’s not a penalty it’s quite hard to argue the decision was corruptsam3110 said:Never a pen, Spence looking for it like me looking for my house keys when my wife has "tidied up"3 -
Because to say this is corrupt is conspiracy theory territory.robroy said:
Why out of interest?SporadicAddick said:Can we please stop with the corruption bollocks.
A shit decision maybe.2 -
All tournament - how clever, he got his body in the way and knows he'll be caught, what a smart player he is etc.Exiled_Addick said:
It’s called drawing the foul and is totally legitimate.sam3110 said:Never a pen, Spence looking for it like me looking for my house keys when my wife has "tidied up"
This game - he got his body in the way so no foul.3 -
There’s maybe a clue in Infantino sitting next to the Norwegian prince. Like he also sat among all the Mexican dignitaries.3
-
Initiating contact is not legitimate thoughExiled_Addick said:
It’s called drawing the foul and is totally legitimate.sam3110 said:Never a pen, Spence looking for it like me looking for my house keys when my wife has "tidied up"5 -
Why are the pundits so scared of disagreeing with refereeing decisions? All tournament, not just England games.3
-
I'd be spitting blood at our defender being stupid enough to throw his leg in.sam3110 said:The way Spence threw his leg out to his right, looked for contact then snapped his legs back together as he threw himself forward? You'd all be spitting blood if someone like Neymar or Ronaldo done that in a game against us, honestly5 -
You really do have some weird takes. He’s trying to get across the defender to open up the angle to shoot and is tripped. He didn’t get a chance to shoot because he was tripped.SELR_addicks said:Don't really like this habit of trying to manufacture penalties when you could just shoot at the goal instead. Happens too much with this England team.11 -
I’d love to see Saka once, just take a player on and get wider and use his right foot.
3 -
North Lower Neil said:Why are the pundits so scared of disagreeing with refereeing decisions? All tournament, not just England games.
Maybe they actually think Spence made a meal of it?3 -
Sponsored links:
-
No doubt you’d have been praising it, if it was an Arsenal playerSELR_addicks said:Don't really like this habit of trying to manufacture penalties when you could just shoot at the goal instead. Happens too much with this England team.0 -
Spence gets infront of their man but he still makes a move.Just because Spence knows the contact is coming doesn’t make it not a foul in my view.5
-
Laughable.Weegie Addick said:There’s maybe a clue in Infantino sitting next to the Norwegian prince. Like he also sat among all the Mexican dignitaries.1 -
Oh look all the pundits, apart from Lee fucking Dixon, agree it wasn't a penalty....
Shock horror, the bias is unbelievable on here sometimes it's hilarious8 -
Appreciate your opinion mate, we are all entitled to them. There have been some mad decisions this World Cup, I’m delighted we don’t have VAR in the champ.SporadicAddick said:Why would anything be corrupt against England?
I thought it was fixed so the bigger teams stay in the tournament?
if that’s the case then surely the corruption is in our favour?
4 -
You sitting with the Crown Prince, the Argentinian officials and relatives of the French officials?SporadicAddick said:Can we please stop with the corruption bollocks.
A shit decision maybe.2 -
Haaland off wtf1
-
Haaland off... Knackered or injured?0
-
Hard for him to sit with British politicians/royals - none have gone!Weegie Addick said:There’s maybe a clue in Infantino sitting next to the Norwegian prince. Like he also sat among all the Mexican dignitaries.0
