Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Bag Limit Size Ban at The Valley

245

Comments

  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 29,470
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,726
    I see the logic, I do 

    I see this as someone who doesn't bring a bag with me to football but see plenty of people with kids who have backpacks and we are meant to be a family club. The club haven't outright come out and said its for security because it can't be if you can buy as much as you want from the club shop and put that in whatever size bag and bring it in. 

    All this shit just makes it hard work getting into football grounds, searches by stewards who have no business searching people. Maybe get the fucking hot water working in the bogs first, engage with the arseholes at Greenwich Council and sort the parking out for match days before dicking about with stuff like this. If the club can find the staffing and effort to facilitate this they can let people out at half time for a smoke too
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 28,108
    Bravo Kips. Bravo. 
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 4,193
    It’s wholly unreasonable to expect people to travel hundreds of miles and tell them they can’t bring anything with them. I’m aware of the security legislation but the people who put forward these things seem to have limited experience of real life.

    Doesn’t apply at Test matches in general, or Lord’s in particular, where you can still take glass bottles or cans in. As for the (common) exception for merchandise, just how shallow can you get?
    Especially if they’re not providing any safe/secure way to store said bags either!
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 24,580
    Off_it said:
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
    "Overdue" in the fact that there's now an official law "Martyn's Law" that is coming into force in Spring 2027, but many arenas have put into play since the incident in 2017. Whilst it hasn't been mandatory up until now, most arenas in the UK have tightened restrictions on bag sizes since
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 34,415
    Off_it said:
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
    I’d say overdue in the context of the Manchester Arena bombing for example.
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,653
    As far as google suggests Martyn’s law doesn’t prescribe bag size. Rather it talks about ‘reasonably practicable’ procedures. 

    Surely they can exercise judgement and not have an artificial blanket ban. 

    As it often feels with such new legislation a top heavy risk averse approach is adopted because some other party did a risk assessment and they follow suit to avoid any suggestion of non compliance. 



  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,726
    Off_it said:
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
    I’d say overdue in the context of the Manchester Arena bombing for example.
    The hemorrhoid who blew themselves up there went in the exit to the station platform rather than go through a check at the entrance. I was at the first event the arena held after that bombing and it was mega trying to get in, dogs, multiple security searches which I felt were overly intrusive but understandable given what had happened there 



  • Sponsored links:



  • I regularly take a normal rucksack to home games having travelled up by Valley Express. Sometimes I may only have lunch in it but on other occasions I might have Birthday or Christmas presents which would not fit in an A4 size bag. When offering my rucksack up for examination at either the Fans Bar or at the turnstiles, the stewards rarely even glance inside, let alone search it. 
    How does an A4 size bag make the ground any safer with this level of security at The Valley?
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 34,415
    I regularly take a normal rucksack to home games having travelled up by Valley Express. Sometimes I may only have lunch in it but on other occasions I might have Birthday or Christmas presents which would not fit in an A4 size bag. When offering my rucksack up for examination at either the Fans Bar or at the turnstiles, the stewards rarely even glance inside, let alone search it. 
    How does an A4 size bag make the ground any safer with this level of security at The Valley?
    It’s my birthday tomorrow (Friday) but I suppose my present can wait till Saturday 😂
  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,503
    Football is not about the fans it seems. 
    Loads of valid reasons for bigger bags given above - but it’s easy to translate the new rule:
    We don’t want to pay those guys that do the bag check anymore. 
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,726
    Football is not about the fans it seems. 
    Loads of valid reasons for bigger bags given above - but it’s easy to translate the new rule:
    We don’t want to pay those guys that do the bag check anymore. 
    Nah, they are still having to do that but just smaller bags 

    I could grudgingly accept this as a good idea in the north stand as bags are an accident or a fight waiting to happen there


  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 29,470
    sam3110 said:
    Off_it said:
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
    "Overdue" in the fact that there's now an official law "Martyn's Law" that is coming into force in Spring 2027, but many arenas have put into play since the incident in 2017. Whilst it hasn't been mandatory up until now, most arenas in the UK have tightened restrictions on bag sizes since
    Off_it said:
    sam3110 said:
    This is standard at 80-90% of venues already. 

    Anyone up in arms about this, I'm afraid this is standard practice and it's actually been pretty overdue at The Valley
    "Overdue" in what context?
    I’d say overdue in the context of the Manchester Arena bombing for example.
    So, we ban bags in all public places as well?

    As has been pointed out, the law refers to taking reasonable precautionary measures - not banning bags outright with no alternative.

    It wont affect me personally, but its a bit shitty for families. And woefully publicised. But hey, it's OK if you want to buy some old shit in the shop - have as many bags as you want! 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 18,870
    I plan to buy the biggest bag from the club shop and put my rucksack in it. 
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 31,145
    Ridiculous rules. Do they think that all fans live 10 minutes away, or come by car (so can leave stuff there)?

    My "Ryanair underseat bag" is  only a bit bigger than A4, so hopefully will be allowed.
    You’ll be allowed to bring it in , for £70.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 31,145
    So a Tesco bag for life, isn’t for Charlton.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 52,424
    shine166 said:
    Tricky rule for people who take children of any age, we are out of the house for a average of 7 hours for a game. 
    Same. 
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 22,406
    Got no issue with the policy itself but concerned about how you get an exemption. It’s already not been communicated well and can’t see how you apply for one. My experience of having to do this regularly doesn’t inspire confidence tbh. Wembley have always been great but Spurs were useless (still not even had a response for my request for Wednesday) as was the London stadium when I went to a gig there in the summer. Dreamland in Margate was the best though when we went to see the pistols last year. There was a massive queue to get in but exemptions went straight to the front via a separate line and my mates were allowed to come with. Was a result as was busting for a piss.

  • Sponsored links:



  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,455
    edited August 28
    At the bag check area in the main reception for the last home match, the security guy seemed to think it was hilarious that Mrs cafcfan had a Sweep glove puppet in her bag.
  • TootingRedArmy
    TootingRedArmy Posts: 618
    edited August 28
    If bag searches are done ...what is difference between a A4 bag and a normal rucksack search? 
    seems unnecesary and will be a hassle for quite a few fans who come straight from work etc 
    Its same BS with airlines, with only tiny bags being free, surprised the club aren't thinking of charging for a rucksack to get into the Valley 

  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 14,627
    edited August 28
    Dazzler21 said:
    shine166 said:
    Tricky rule for people who take children of any age, we are out of the house for a average of 7 hours for a game. 
    Same. 
    Snacks, drinks bottle, ear defenders, wet wipes, extra jacket now the weather is unpredictable. Space for any tat/kits he wants from the shop. 

    It just doesn't work , you suck it up for Wembley as its a rare occasion, plus there are plenty of options for food in and around the ground.  

    There are plenty of other ways to spend well over £150 on a Saturday, with much less hassle. 
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 6,043
    Rob7Lee said:
    Thanks for pointing this out, I hadn't spotted it, no midweek games for me then as if I do get there I have to come from work and aren't getting all my stuff in a bag smaller than A4! - do I get a refund on my season ticket for those games? Let me guess..........

    Bag drop seems a good idea, but not sure I'd trust leaving a few grands worth of stuff there....
    can you apply for an extention? This is so ridiculously unfair on people going directly from work. How is it ok to take in a larger bag but only if it is from the store?
  • gringo
    gringo Posts: 1,509
    edited August 28
    So would the bag I often take, like this but Charlton branded and bought from the CAFC shop 18 months ago, be permitted? its certainly bigger than A4 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 28,108
    gringo said:
    So would the bag I often take, like this but Charlton branded and bought from the CAFC shop 18 months ago, be permitted? its certainly bigger than A4 
    you have literally answered your own question
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,653
    Rob7Lee said:
    Thanks for pointing this out, I hadn't spotted it, no midweek games for me then as if I do get there I have to come from work and aren't getting all my stuff in a bag smaller than A4! - do I get a refund on my season ticket for those games? Let me guess..........

    Bag drop seems a good idea, but not sure I'd trust leaving a few grands worth of stuff there....
    can you apply for an extention? This is so ridiculously unfair on people going directly from work. How is it ok to take in a larger bag but only if it is from the store?
    To A3? 😉😀
  • TootingRedArmy
    TootingRedArmy Posts: 618
    edited August 28
    I don’t think the stewards will have rulers or tape measures or there will be airport size boxes to check exact A4 measurements, this bag is fine I use similar at other venues.
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,455
    If bag searches are done ...what is difference between a A4 bag : rucksack and a normal rucksack search? 



    I don't know - it's your joke.

    But seriously, this stuff is worked out on the basis that in all probability the security staff find the task of searching bags boring in the extreme and won't do it properly. 

    Excluding large bag sizes is an easy and foolproof way of ensuring that large explosive devices do not get in the building. 10 kg of military grade explosives can take down a multi-story building and kill everyone within a 35m radius. 1kg only kills within a 5-10m radius and the building probably survives.  That's a big difference in the numbers of dead supporters.

    Also the larger the bag the longer it takes to search creating queues and pressure as kick-off time approaches.

    Is it rubbish and is it a real drag for supporters?  Yes it is but the alternative doesn't bear thinking about.  We're going to have to suck it up.

    As usual, it would have helped if the club had communicated something about it in a prominent way with an explanation as to why the restriction was being imposed.  But they didn't.  It's going to be a right bastard for the kitman....

    People do ridiculous things balancing cost vs effectiveness to attempt to minimise risk and the results are not always very sensible. Many years ago my employer was exploring ways of reducing damage from bomb blasts outside the building.  The recommended answer was to install a clear film on the windows and use special tear-resistant net curtains one and a half times the drop of the window. The surplus curtain was weighted and lived in a box on the window sill. The concept being that the film would stop the glass from shattering into shards and the curtain/box would retain all the larger pieces so they wouldn't fly around the offices. 
    My employer was happy to pay for the window film but not the curtains and boxes. The end result being that in the event of an explosion, instead of staff getting small pieces of glass stuck in their face they would all be decapitated by lots of large panes hurtling through the office at high velocity.  You pay your money you take your choice.
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,629
    cafcfan said:
    If bag searches are done ...what is difference between a A4 bag : rucksack and a normal rucksack search? 



    I don't know - it's your joke.

    But seriously, this stuff is worked out on the basis that in all probability the security staff find the task of searching bags boring in the extreme and won't do it properly. 

    Excluding large bag sizes is an easy and foolproof way of ensuring that large explosive devices do not get in the building. 10 kg of military grade explosives can take down a multi-story building and kill everyone within a 35m radius. 1kg only kills within a 5-10m radius and the building probably survives.  That's a big difference in the numbers of dead supporters.

    Also the larger the bag the longer it takes to search creating queues and pressure as kick-off time approaches.

    Is it rubbish and is it a real drag for supporters?  Yes it is but the alternative doesn't bear thinking about.  We're going to have to suck it up.

    As usual, it would have helped if the club had communicated something about it in a prominent way with an explanation as to why the restriction was being imposed.  But they didn't.  Its going to be a right bastard for the kitman....

    People do ridiculous things balancing cost vs effectiveness to attempt to minimise risk and the results are not always very sensible. Many years ago my employer was exploring ways of reducing damage from bomb blasts outside the building.  The recommended answer was to install a clear film on the windows and use special tear-resistant net curtains one and a half times the drop of the window. The surplus curtain was weighted and lived in a box on the window sill. The concept being that the film would stop the glass from shattering into shards and the curtain/box would retain all the larger pieces so they wouldn't fly around the offices. 
    My employer was happy to pay for the window film but not the curtains and boxes. The end result being that in the event of an explosion, instead of staff getting small pieces of glass stuck in their face they would all be decapitated by lots of large panes hurtling through the office at high velocity.  You pay your money you take your choice.
    Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink's shorts were definitely bigger than A4 size.