Got an awful cold. Started as a piercing earache for two days, and yesterday everything just decided to fall out my nose. Woke up with my moustache so snot encrusted it looked like I was playing a harmonica no handed. To top it all off, I make an extra spicy curry so that I had a chance to taste it, and my aris is going like the whistle on a kettle
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Language evolves.
It also regresses.
It’s not a regression if it now has a different meaning.
Whether you like it or not, it is now used to add emphasis.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Language evolves.
It also regresses.
It’s not a regression if it now has a different meaning.
Whether you like it or not, it is now used to add emphasis.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
You've gone and done it now, you've used two question marks!
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
You've gone and done it now, you've used two question marks!
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Language evolves.
It also regresses.
It’s not a regression if it now has a different meaning.
Whether you like it or not, it is now used to add emphasis.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
I went on there and posted my own post of sympathy. I wouldn't dream of sullying the thread which is why I expressed my objection to the use of exclamation marks on here. Talk of 'modern usage', lanuage 'evolving' and me being a 'luddite' is as fatuous as it is glib. Let's pander to the lowest common denominator, that's real progress. Good night.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
I went on there and posted my own post of sympathy. I wouldn't dream of sullying the thread which is why I expressed my objection to the use of exclamation marks on here. Talk of 'modern usage', lanuage 'evolving' and me being a 'luddite' is as fatuous as it is glib. Let's pander to the lowest common denominator, that's real progress. Good night.
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
I went on there and posted my own post of sympathy. I wouldn't dream of sullying the thread which is why I expressed my objection to the use of exclamation marks on here. Talk of 'modern usage', lanuage 'evolving' and me being a 'luddite' is as fatuous as it is glib. Let's pander to the lowest common denominator, that's real progress. Good night.
Don’t be ridiculous.
Perhaps you would prefer that language never evolved and we speak as we would have done in the Middle Ages ...gadzooks !!
Have put this up before, but have seen a couple of people on the 'Lucy Kerr RIP' thread using exclamation marks. Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Not sure I agree. Whilst an exclamation mark was historically used to convey excitement, modern usage means it now reflects any strong emotion.
'modern usage' is nothing but an excuse for ignorance. It's crass, and that's all there is to it.
Really? People have gone on there to express their sympathy and you pick up on the fact that they have used an explanation mark to suggest they are insensitive or dim??
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
I went on there and posted my own post of sympathy. I wouldn't dream of sullying the thread which is why I expressed my objection to the use of exclamation marks on here. Talk of 'modern usage', lanuage 'evolving' and me being a 'luddite' is as fatuous as it is glib. Let's pander to the lowest common denominator, that's real progress. Good night.
When classic albums are remastered and then additional bonus tracks are added which in general are bloody awful.
Plus the ridiculous need to add 3000 additional versions of the same song in a variety of mixes, with no noticeable difference in any of them!
If your gonna remaster an album fine but just stick to the f ing original track listing, I really don't want filler bloody tracks that are a total waste of space and inevitably detract from the original recording!
I get really pissed off with people that don't know the difference between pissed and pissed off. I've seen it a few times on here recently and it really boils my piss. Here's a little guide to help any muppets who don't know the correct way to use these phrases:
I get really pissed off with people that don't know the difference between pissed and pissed off. I've seen it a few times on here recently and it really boils my piss. Here's a little guide to help any muppets who don't know the correct way to use these phrases:
I get really pissed off with people that don't know the difference between pissed and pissed off. I've seen it a few times on here recently and it really boils my piss. Here's a little guide to help any muppets who don't know the correct way to use these phrases:
I get really pissed off with people that don't know the difference between pissed and pissed off. I've seen it a few times on here recently and it really boils my piss. Here's a little guide to help any muppets who don't know the correct way to use these phrases:
Comments
What’s the fascination?
Are they that insensitive, or just plain dim to see how inappropriate it is.
Whether you like it or not, it is now used to add emphasis.
I've seen some arsehole remarks on this forum in the past, but I think this tops the lot.
Talk of 'modern usage', lanuage 'evolving' and me being a 'luddite' is as fatuous as it is glib. Let's pander to the lowest common denominator, that's real progress.
Good night.
Perhaps you would prefer that language never evolved and we speak as we would have done in the Middle Ages ...gadzooks !!
Plus the ridiculous need to add 3000 additional versions of the same song in a variety of mixes, with no noticeable difference in any of them!
If your gonna remaster an album fine but just stick to the f ing original track listing, I really don't want filler bloody tracks that are a total waste of space and inevitably detract from the original recording!
Strange thing to get pissed about
Nauseating at any time, but doubly bad in inescapable proximity