Just seen Bkack Klansman. So different from Green Book, I’m not sure I can compare them. But...
I think on technical merit I’d give it to GB, but as a film that gets a message across, its BK.
Both stand up as great movies in their own way I reckon. I’d say Klansman maybe lacks the polish to win the best picture Oscar. Very good movie though.
Thanks, I might go see GB today. I saw BK and thought it was a "B."
Just seen Bkack Klansman. So different from Green Book, I’m not sure I can compare them. But...
I think on technical merit I’d give it to GB, but as a film that gets a message across, its BK.
Both stand up as great movies in their own way I reckon. I’d say Klansman maybe lacks the polish to win the best picture Oscar. Very good movie though.
Thanks, I might go see GB today. I saw BK and thought it was a "B."
GB is much slicker. Friends have taken their kids to see it, and all enjoyed it. It’s like a family anti racist buddy/road movie.
Watched Maze the other night. Inspired by the true events of the infamous 1983 prison breakout of 38 IRA prisoners from HMP, which was to become the biggest prison escape in Europe since World War II.
Really enjoyed it, bloody worrying how amateurish the Garda where at looking after the prisoners.
The 'troubles' have always interested me, 7/10
Not sure what the Garda would have been doing in the an HMP seeing as they're the Irish police. Was there some kind of arrangement with the Republic?
If anyone wants to know why Spike Lee walked away in disgust when Green Book won the Oscar, I would suggest listening to the New York Times Daily Podcast from earlier this week.
I haven't seen Green Book yet so it's hard to comment, but I understand Lee's perspective now. I'm often not a fan of his style but him not getting any Oscar recognition for so long, and losing out to Driving Miss Daisy and Green Book when he IS nominated, is crazy.
The crux of the podcast above is that Green Book, like The Help, Miss Daisy and many others, features horrible white people learning the errors of their ways while black characters only exist to help the white people achieve that.
That's a pretty boiled-down explanation from me, the podcast explains it much better than I can. When I consider the complex relationships between the black and white characters in BlacKKKlansman, I find it hard not to side with him.
I'd like Spike Lee a lot more if he got rid of that massive chip on his shoulder. He's made some piss poor films in the past 20 years and that's the reason he hasn't won .
To compare Green Book with Driving Miss Daisy is ridiculous. Green book is a great film and worthy of winning best picture. If he's actually saying it's about horrible white people learning the error of there ways while black characters on exists to help white people achieve that then 1. He hasn't seen Green book and 2. We might as well dismiss great films Like The Green Mile and American History X .
Sorry , but the man is Pillock at times and should concentrate on making better movies instead of digging out other film makers . BlacKkKlansman ' whilst being a pretty good film , didn't deserve best picture because it wasn't good enough. Green Book was . Try to get to see it Jimmy . I think you'll like it a lot.
So Do the Right Thing and BlackKklansman didn't win because he made other films that were bad? That's weird reasoning, especially as any tosh he's made in the last twenty years happened after Do the Right Thing was not even nominated.
Just seen Bkack Klansman. So different from Green Book, I’m not sure I can compare them. But...
I think on technical merit I’d give it to GB, but as a film that gets a message across, its BK.
Both stand up as great movies in their own way I reckon. I’d say Klansman maybe lacks the polish to win the best picture Oscar. Very good movie though.
Thanks, I might go see GB today. I saw BK and thought it was a "B."
I haven't seen Green Book but I thought BlackKklansman, The Favourite and First Man were the best three films I saw over the last year.
Jaundiced / accurate (delete as appropriate) look at the art world but there's more to the story than everyone being vile. I won't give any spoilers but it's very creepy and very enjoyable.
If anyone wants to know why Spike Lee walked away in disgust when Green Book won the Oscar, I would suggest listening to the New York Times Daily Podcast from earlier this week.
I haven't seen Green Book yet so it's hard to comment, but I understand Lee's perspective now. I'm often not a fan of his style but him not getting any Oscar recognition for so long, and losing out to Driving Miss Daisy and Green Book when he IS nominated, is crazy.
The crux of the podcast above is that Green Book, like The Help, Miss Daisy and many others, features horrible white people learning the errors of their ways while black characters only exist to help the white people achieve that.
That's a pretty boiled-down explanation from me, the podcast explains it much better than I can. When I consider the complex relationships between the black and white characters in BlacKKKlansman, I find it hard not to side with him.
I'd like Spike Lee a lot more if he got rid of that massive chip on his shoulder. He's made some piss poor films in the past 20 years and that's the reason he hasn't won .
To compare Green Book with Driving Miss Daisy is ridiculous. Green book is a great film and worthy of winning best picture. If he's actually saying it's about horrible white people learning the error of there ways while black characters on exists to help white people achieve that then 1. He hasn't seen Green book and 2. We might as well dismiss great films Like The Green Mile and American History X .
Sorry , but the man is Pillock at times and should concentrate on making better movies instead of digging out other film makers . BlacKkKlansman ' whilst being a pretty good film , didn't deserve best picture because it wasn't good enough. Green Book was . Try to get to see it Jimmy . I think you'll like it a lot.
So Do the Right Thing and BlackKklansman didn't win because he made other films that were bad? That's weird reasoning, especially as any tosh he's made in the last twenty years happened after Do the Right Thing was not even nominated.
Do the right thing is 30 years old and was in an era when he made good movies and I agree he should have been nominated . I was talking about why he hasn’t won in the last 20 years and why he shouldn’t be complaining about Green Book unless he made a better movie - He didn’t.
If anyone wants to know why Spike Lee walked away in disgust when Green Book won the Oscar, I would suggest listening to the New York Times Daily Podcast from earlier this week.
I haven't seen Green Book yet so it's hard to comment, but I understand Lee's perspective now. I'm often not a fan of his style but him not getting any Oscar recognition for so long, and losing out to Driving Miss Daisy and Green Book when he IS nominated, is crazy.
The crux of the podcast above is that Green Book, like The Help, Miss Daisy and many others, features horrible white people learning the errors of their ways while black characters only exist to help the white people achieve that.
That's a pretty boiled-down explanation from me, the podcast explains it much better than I can. When I consider the complex relationships between the black and white characters in BlacKKKlansman, I find it hard not to side with him.
I'd like Spike Lee a lot more if he got rid of that massive chip on his shoulder. He's made some piss poor films in the past 20 years and that's the reason he hasn't won .
To compare Green Book with Driving Miss Daisy is ridiculous. Green book is a great film and worthy of winning best picture. If he's actually saying it's about horrible white people learning the error of there ways while black characters on exists to help white people achieve that then 1. He hasn't seen Green book and 2. We might as well dismiss great films Like The Green Mile and American History X .
Sorry , but the man is Pillock at times and should concentrate on making better movies instead of digging out other film makers . BlacKkKlansman ' whilst being a pretty good film , didn't deserve best picture because it wasn't good enough. Green Book was . Try to get to see it Jimmy . I think you'll like it a lot.
So Do the Right Thing and BlackKklansman didn't win because he made other films that were bad? That's weird reasoning, especially as any tosh he's made in the last twenty years happened after Do the Right Thing was not even nominated.
Do the right thing is 30 years old and was in an era when he made good movies and I agree he should have been nominated . I was talking about why he hasn’t won in the last 20 years and why he shouldn’t be complaining about Green Book unless he made a better movie - He didn’t.
Quite a lot of people, including most of the name critics, think he did.
If anyone wants to know why Spike Lee walked away in disgust when Green Book won the Oscar, I would suggest listening to the New York Times Daily Podcast from earlier this week.
I haven't seen Green Book yet so it's hard to comment, but I understand Lee's perspective now. I'm often not a fan of his style but him not getting any Oscar recognition for so long, and losing out to Driving Miss Daisy and Green Book when he IS nominated, is crazy.
The crux of the podcast above is that Green Book, like The Help, Miss Daisy and many others, features horrible white people learning the errors of their ways while black characters only exist to help the white people achieve that.
That's a pretty boiled-down explanation from me, the podcast explains it much better than I can. When I consider the complex relationships between the black and white characters in BlacKKKlansman, I find it hard not to side with him.
I'd like Spike Lee a lot more if he got rid of that massive chip on his shoulder. He's made some piss poor films in the past 20 years and that's the reason he hasn't won .
To compare Green Book with Driving Miss Daisy is ridiculous. Green book is a great film and worthy of winning best picture. If he's actually saying it's about horrible white people learning the error of there ways while black characters on exists to help white people achieve that then 1. He hasn't seen Green book and 2. We might as well dismiss great films Like The Green Mile and American History X .
Sorry , but the man is Pillock at times and should concentrate on making better movies instead of digging out other film makers . BlacKkKlansman ' whilst being a pretty good film , didn't deserve best picture because it wasn't good enough. Green Book was . Try to get to see it Jimmy . I think you'll like it a lot.
So Do the Right Thing and BlackKklansman didn't win because he made other films that were bad? That's weird reasoning, especially as any tosh he's made in the last twenty years happened after Do the Right Thing was not even nominated.
Do the right thing is 30 years old and was in an era when he made good movies and I agree he should have been nominated . I was talking about why he hasn’t won in the last 20 years and why he shouldn’t be complaining about Green Book unless he made a better movie - He didn’t.
Quite a lot of people, including most of the name critics, think he did.
I should have of added “ in my opinion “ .
I thought BlacKkKlasman was a good film made more thought provoking by the last five minutes when you see the footage of what happened at Charlottesville but Green Book has stayed with me much more since I watched both .
I was planning to go see Fighting with My Family next Friday. Trouble was all I could find was screenings for Captain Marvel. So I looked for showings at other cinemas for the weekend or the following week and all I can find is Captain Marvel. So I think WTF and start to dig a bit deeper and it looks like for the entire week, Captain Marvel is showing on practically every cinema screen in the UK, excluding every other film out at the moment. And not just the UK, it's the same across the USA, Canada and Australia too. Pretty much every screen at every cinema in the English speaking world, nothing but Captain Marvel for a week!
I've never seen anything like this before. Is it even legal?!
I was looking at advance dates as well and saw marvel everywhere and i thought it was because they are still deciding the schedule for other films.
i stopped watching marvel films after civil war. Find them all very similar and formulaic.
If anyone wants to know why Spike Lee walked away in disgust when Green Book won the Oscar, I would suggest listening to the New York Times Daily Podcast from earlier this week.
I haven't seen Green Book yet so it's hard to comment, but I understand Lee's perspective now. I'm often not a fan of his style but him not getting any Oscar recognition for so long, and losing out to Driving Miss Daisy and Green Book when he IS nominated, is crazy.
The crux of the podcast above is that Green Book, like The Help, Miss Daisy and many others, features horrible white people learning the errors of their ways while black characters only exist to help the white people achieve that.
That's a pretty boiled-down explanation from me, the podcast explains it much better than I can. When I consider the complex relationships between the black and white characters in BlacKKKlansman, I find it hard not to side with him.
I'd like Spike Lee a lot more if he got rid of that massive chip on his shoulder. He's made some piss poor films in the past 20 years and that's the reason he hasn't won .
To compare Green Book with Driving Miss Daisy is ridiculous. Green book is a great film and worthy of winning best picture. If he's actually saying it's about horrible white people learning the error of there ways while black characters on exists to help white people achieve that then 1. He hasn't seen Green book and 2. We might as well dismiss great films Like The Green Mile and American History X .
Sorry , but the man is Pillock at times and should concentrate on making better movies instead of digging out other film makers . BlacKkKlansman ' whilst being a pretty good film , didn't deserve best picture because it wasn't good enough. Green Book was . Try to get to see it Jimmy . I think you'll like it a lot.
So Do the Right Thing and BlackKklansman didn't win because he made other films that were bad? That's weird reasoning, especially as any tosh he's made in the last twenty years happened after Do the Right Thing was not even nominated.
Do the right thing is 30 years old and was in an era when he made good movies and I agree he should have been nominated . I was talking about why he hasn’t won in the last 20 years and why he shouldn’t be complaining about Green Book unless he made a better movie - He didn’t.
Quite a lot of people, including most of the name critics, think he did.
I should have of added “ in my opinion “ .
I thought BlacKkKlasman was a good film made more thought provoking by the last five minutes when you see the footage of what happened at Charlottesville but Green Book has stayed with me much more since I watched both .
I thought both were good films and ultimately any award is subjective.
'Do the Right Thing' should have won Spike Lee an Oscar and it was certainly the best depiction of racial tension in a film that I've seen.
I feel that Roma, Capernaum and Shoplifters are the best films of the last twelve months in terms of their originality and storytelling.
Very late on this one but finally got round to watching Manchester By The Sea as it was on my flight. Wanted to open the door and jump from 35,000ft at one point. Affleck was quality and there were a couple of funny moments, but ultimately I felt like I made myself depressed for very little reason. Not my cup of tea.
I hate trying to think.of the best films over a set time frame as inevitably I will get some wrong or in the wrong time
A Star is Born was definitely up there Bohemian Rhapsody was ok I don't think it was much more than a songbook though 3 billboards and wind river were superb but I'm sure they were the year previous
I'll watch black Kkklansman soon I like Spike Lee but he can make frustrating films that just indulge him. And he banged Ricki Lake
I was planning to go see Fighting with My Family next Friday. Trouble was all I could find was screenings for Captain Marvel. So I looked for showings at other cinemas for the weekend or the following week and all I can find is Captain Marvel. So I think WTF and start to dig a bit deeper and it looks like for the entire week, Captain Marvel is showing on practically every cinema screen in the UK, excluding every other film out at the moment. And not just the UK, it's the same across the USA, Canada and Australia too. Pretty much every screen at every cinema in the English speaking world, nothing but Captain Marvel for a week!
I've never seen anything like this before. Is it even legal?!
I was looking at advance dates as well and saw marvel everywhere and i thought it was because they are still deciding the schedule for other films.
i stopped watching marvel films after civil war. Find them all very similar and formulaic.
I reached peak Marvel a while back, Civil War was the last one I saw at the cinema. I've tried Black Panther on Sky a few times but have never finished it. It's all become a bit dull and samey.
I can't believe that one movie can switch off the advance booking for every other film. That doesn't seem right or fair to me. I'm trying to organise a trip to the cinema next Friday and I have no idea where or when the film we want to see is going to be. So annoying.
As far as I know the cinema chains are well within their rights to choose which movies they show.
Historically, cinema chains were owned by the studios and so they only showed their own movies. There was a landmark ruling that stopped that in the 50s, and so cinemas became independent from studios. Although the emergence of entertainment apps is seeing a return to that system IMO.
Today, cinema chains all want the biggest movies and will keep them on screen until they’ve squeezed every penny from them (they insist on 90 day exclusivity for that and go nuts if a distributor offers a home entertainment option before then). Marvel movies will be more attractive to Odeon or Cineworld than Fighting With My Family.
Also, distributors don’t tend to release movies in the weeks around a tent pole release unless it’s counter programming (a rom-com alongside Captain Marvel for instance) and Fighting With My Family fits that bill. So this is a bit odd.
But I’m not certain every chain is allowed access to every movie - I assume so, but someone more in the know might need to comment here.
I appreciate that cinemas have to do everything they can to maximise their earnings when they're competing against so many other cheaper, easier entertainment alternatives. Back when films were on film a cinema could only show the prints they had. With digital distribution today, it's quite possible for a cinema chain to show the same film on every screen all day but that doesn't mean they should. What about consumer choice?
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
I appreciate that cinemas have to do everything they can to maximise their earnings when they're competing against so many other cheaper, easier entertainment alternatives. Back when films were on film a cinema could only show the prints they had. With digital distribution today, it's quite possible for a cinema chain to show the same film on every screen all day but that doesn't mean they should. What about consumer choice?
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
The Cineworld website is certainly allowing you to book anything as I've been using it.
I appreciate that cinemas have to do everything they can to maximise their earnings when they're competing against so many other cheaper, easier entertainment alternatives. Back when films were on film a cinema could only show the prints they had. With digital distribution today, it's quite possible for a cinema chain to show the same film on every screen all day but that doesn't mean they should. What about consumer choice?
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
The Cineworld website is certainly allowing you to book anything as I've been using it.
Check the week of 8 to 13 March and see how you get on. I'm trying to organise something for this Friday that isn't Captain Marvel and not having much luck.
Wow that’s longer than I thought! My old boss was obsessed with bringing that down and releasing on subscription same time as cinema, but I read an interesting piece this week that said day and date releases were dead. You think that’s true?
Also just to be clear on the above - I’m not supportive of cinemas maxing our on Marvel - especially Curzon. As @Missed It said, you expect them to offer something different.
Disney’s dominance of the box office is only going to get stronger too.
Wow that’s longer than I thought! My old boss was obsessed with bringing that down and releasing on subscription same time as cinema, but I read an interesting piece this week that said day and date releases were dead. You think that’s true?
Also just to be clear on the above - I’m not supportive of cinemas maxing our on Marvel - especially Curzon. As @Missed It said, you expect them to offer something different.
Disney’s dominance of the box office is only going to get stronger too.
It's kind of depressing to think what will happen when Disney own everything and launch yet another subscription streaming service for the content they're pulling from Netflix. They've already ruined Star Wars. Now the word is they are going to shut down Marvel Comics as the comic industry is kind of collapsing and they're only bothered about the movie properties.
I appreciate that cinemas have to do everything they can to maximise their earnings when they're competing against so many other cheaper, easier entertainment alternatives. Back when films were on film a cinema could only show the prints they had. With digital distribution today, it's quite possible for a cinema chain to show the same film on every screen all day but that doesn't mean they should. What about consumer choice?
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
The Cineworld website is certainly allowing you to book anything as I've been using it.
Check the week of 8 to 13 March and see how you get on. I'm trying to organise something for this Friday that isn't Captain Marvel and not having much luck.
Pretty sure that this is a quirk of the booking systems.
You can book 'blockbusters' weeks in advance, but other films only become available in the week of the screening.
Check tomorrow or Tuesday and it will be widely available.
I appreciate that cinemas have to do everything they can to maximise their earnings when they're competing against so many other cheaper, easier entertainment alternatives. Back when films were on film a cinema could only show the prints they had. With digital distribution today, it's quite possible for a cinema chain to show the same film on every screen all day but that doesn't mean they should. What about consumer choice?
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
The Cineworld website is certainly allowing you to book anything as I've been using it.
Check the week of 8 to 13 March and see how you get on. I'm trying to organise something for this Friday that isn't Captain Marvel and not having much luck.
Website always works like that - bookings are up until Thursday for most films. New listings for Friday onwards appear at the start of the week.
There are a few things you can book in advance such as unlimited screenings, one-offs and blockbusters but I'm assuming some listings aren't confirned that far in advance. I'm assuming box office figures must affect showings for films.
Saw ‘On the Basis of Sex’ during the week. Biopic about Ruth Bader Ginsburg the US Supreme Court Judge, so a film for those interested in politics in the main. Really uplifting story of an incredible women trying to succeed in a male dominated environment while bringing up a child and caring for a husband suffering from cancer. Concentrates on her early career fighting against gender discrimination so perhaps not one for those of a particular political persuasion. Puts into perspective just how low the bar for Supreme Court appointments has now fallen with Brett Kavanaugh.
Wow that’s longer than I thought! My old boss was obsessed with bringing that down and releasing on subscription same time as cinema, but I read an interesting piece this week that said day and date releases were dead. You think that’s true?
Also just to be clear on the above - I’m not supportive of cinemas maxing our on Marvel - especially Curzon. As @Missed It said, you expect them to offer something different.
Disney’s dominance of the box office is only going to get stronger too.
It's kind of depressing to think what will happen when Disney own everything and launch yet another subscription streaming service for the content they're pulling from Netflix. They've already ruined Star Wars. Now the word is they are going to shut down Marvel Comics as the comic industry is kind of collapsing and they're only bothered about the movie properties.
I might break the vulgarity ban at some point here. I don't think I can remember watching a film that has lived up to the hype as much as this. Lady Gaga is obviously already a very gifted singer and this gave her an opportunity to show her capabilities off. For me Bradley Cooper deserves all the recognition that comes his way.
9.5/10 brilliant film and if you don't end up with something in your eye at the end you have no heart
Watched it this afternoon with my wife. It seems I have no heart but she does! I thought it was ok, one good song which they made the most of, good performances from the leads, but 7 out of 10 for me.
Comments
Jaundiced / accurate (delete as appropriate) look at the art world but there's more to the story than everyone being vile. I won't give any spoilers but it's very creepy and very enjoyable.
I thought BlacKkKlasman was a good film made more thought provoking by the last five minutes when you see the footage of what happened at Charlottesville but Green Book has stayed with me much more since I watched both .
I was looking at advance dates as well and saw marvel everywhere and i thought it was because they are still deciding the schedule for other films.
i stopped watching marvel films after civil war. Find them all very similar and formulaic.
'Do the Right Thing' should have won Spike Lee an Oscar and it was certainly the best depiction of racial tension in a film that I've seen.
I feel that Roma, Capernaum and Shoplifters are the best films of the last twelve months in terms of their originality and storytelling.
A Star is Born was definitely up there
Bohemian Rhapsody was ok I don't think it was much more than a songbook though
3 billboards and wind river were superb but I'm sure they were the year previous
I'll watch black Kkklansman soon I like Spike Lee but he can make frustrating films that just indulge him. And he banged Ricki Lake
I reached peak Marvel a while back, Civil War was the last one I saw at the cinema. I've tried Black Panther on Sky a few times but have never finished it. It's all become a bit dull and samey.
I can't believe that one movie can switch off the advance booking for every other film. That doesn't seem right or fair to me. I'm trying to organise a trip to the cinema next Friday and I have no idea where or when the film we want to see is going to be. So annoying.
within their rights to choose which movies they show.
Historically, cinema chains were owned by the studios and so they only showed their own movies. There was a landmark ruling that stopped that in the 50s, and so cinemas became independent from studios. Although the emergence of entertainment apps is seeing a return to that system IMO.
Today, cinema chains all want the biggest movies and will keep them on screen until they’ve squeezed every penny from them (they insist on 90 day exclusivity for that and go nuts if a distributor offers a home entertainment option before then). Marvel movies will be more attractive to Odeon or Cineworld than Fighting With My Family.
Also, distributors don’t tend to release movies in the weeks around a tent pole release unless it’s counter programming (a rom-com alongside Captain Marvel for instance) and Fighting With My Family fits that bill. So this is a bit odd.
But I’m not certain every chain is allowed access to every movie - I assume so, but someone more in the know might need to comment here.
I'm a Curzon member so was a bit put out when they only listed Captain Marvel. That sort of film is not really what they're about. They show them, they have to make a living after all, but it's not the market they usually look to. I'm sure Curzon don't have deals with all distributors, they often miss out on quite popular films.
I looked at other cinema chains, Cineworld, Odeon, Showcase, it's all the same. Captain Marvel or go without at the moment. I had a look at overseas cinemas too. It's the same in USA, Canada and Australia. The only cinema I could find not doing it was the Prince Charles, but they're an independent rep. cinema so don't really count.
It's not even as if Captain Marvel tickets haven't been on pre-sale already for ages. I have friends who got their tickets weeks ago. (I passed, I'm not paying stupid first night West End prices for a movie I'm not bothered about) I don't see the need, or the justification for every cinema chain to block pre-booking for every other movie out.
I know Disney/Marvel are starting to panic a bit on this film in case it does a "Solo". The trailers weren't much cop and Bree Larson just looked bored in all of them. I think they're right to be worried. I'm a bit of a comic nerd and even I'm not going to see it. It all just smells a bit fishy to me, like cinemas are operating on a cartel basis or Disney is twisting arms. Wiping out the competition like this on opening weekend would certainly help the film.
Check the week of 8 to 13 March and see how you get on. I'm trying to organise something for this Friday that isn't Captain Marvel and not having much luck.
Also just to be clear on the above - I’m not supportive of cinemas maxing our on Marvel - especially Curzon. As @Missed It said, you expect them to offer something different.
Disney’s dominance of the box office is only going to get stronger too.
It's kind of depressing to think what will happen when Disney own everything and launch yet another subscription streaming service for the content they're pulling from Netflix. They've already ruined Star Wars. Now the word is they are going to shut down Marvel Comics as the comic industry is kind of collapsing and they're only bothered about the movie properties.
You can book 'blockbusters' weeks in advance, but other films only become available in the week of the screening.
Check tomorrow or Tuesday and it will be widely available.
Pleasently surprised, good twist, worth a watch!
There are a few things you can book in advance such as unlimited screenings, one-offs and blockbusters but I'm assuming some listings aren't confirned that far in advance. I'm assuming box office figures must affect showings for films.