Oh, I see. Another wum who thinks he's up there with Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain. Do that sort of rubbish on a match thread and it's an instant ban and kicking round the back of the bike shed after school.
Ha ha at least we can don't all take these things too seriously eh! ;o)
really makes you wonder how much some of our other players are worth - i know there's potential / age and playing style etc to factor in but lets face it, he was never a lynchpin of our side last year and was missing for a big chunk including the real crucial games when we 'broke' the rest of the division. I'm really liking the sound of this and whilst i was and am an admirer of the way he plays, i think we will benefit from a replacement due to the things he lacks.
I just think its good we are not snapping their hands off. If we get 2 million for Stephens, I think we could sign 2 players with that money to improve the midfield.
I hate this time of year,so much rumour,so little real information.Roll on 11 pm on Friday.Hold on the loan window will still be open,reaches into the medicine cupboard for some Valium ,be gentle with me Nurse.
I hate this time of year,so much rumour,so little real information.Roll on 11 pm on Friday.Hold on the loan window will still be open,reaches into the medicine cupboard for some Valium ,be gentle with me Nurse.
I second that mate. The later that it gets, the worse it is, as you do not get much time to replace players.
So we've turned down 1.5m (sky) and are demanding 1.4 (crawley)? I respect the board sticking to their guns but not impressed with their business sense!
Comments
I know I did.
It has always been:
"I'll believe it when it's on the OS"
Nothing less, nothing more.
: - )
I'll have to look up "venerable" though.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/8031579/?
(let it be Heskey ... let it be Heskey ... DOH !!)