Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jim Davidson

1…34689…12

Comments

  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    Probably but she was so ugly it was never going to happen
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,879
    nolly said:

    Probably but she was so ugly it was never going to happen

    What do you mean, if she was better looking your missus may have been tempted?!
    :-O
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    No I would have joined in
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    Lol


    Even being a palace fan wouldn't stop me
  • BIG_ROB
    BIG_ROB Posts: 5,274
    @nolly

    You ain't got her number pal have you?

    ; )
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    See what I can go Big Rob
  • BIG_ROB
    BIG_ROB Posts: 5,274
    nolly said:

    See what I can go Big Rob

    Cushty
  • BlackForestReds
    BlackForestReds Posts: 17,952
    Off_it said:

    BlackForestReds said:


    My problem is that every report mentions JS - when there is no link. Mud sticks and shit stinks - and in my view the people reporting this know fully well what they are doing, as do the coppers feeding them the info.



    You seen the Mirror's headline today?

    "Savile cops nick nick TV's Jim".

    Not exactly clear there is no link from that, is it? That's my point. No need to mention JS. The link to JS is tenuous at best, but the headline is deliberately misleading.

    But wat part of that is untrue or even a defamation? The cops were part of the same team investigating Jimmy Saville, so sensationalist and perhaps potentially misleading but otherwise true.

    The case law here is Charleston v News Group Newspapers* - misleading headlines that aren't supported in the following article give the newspaper a defence.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jim-davidson-out-of-celebrity-big-1515633

    Even the DM managed to get the point across that JD's arrest was nothing to do with JS.

    * IIRC an article about Madge and Harold from Neighbours where the newspaper in question had superimposed their heads onto the bodies of two porn models.
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    2s up rob pal
  • BIG_ROB
    BIG_ROB Posts: 5,274
    nth london addick said:

    2s up rob pal

    We'll convert it!

  • Sponsored links:



  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,603
    Can i join in and make it airtight?
  • BIG_ROB
    BIG_ROB Posts: 5,274
    Yeah
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    Quite apt comedy is taking over this thread . Keep it up
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    sounds like a joke Nolly "have you herd the one about 3 train spoters and a lesbian"
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,662
    Nolly, should have told the OB you were on holiday in the Greek island of Lesbos.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,603
    They took down her particulars and rammed her carriage
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    Mine will stay up dunno about the other boys

  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    I bet Jimbo would know the punch line
  • GretnaGreenAddick
    GretnaGreenAddick Posts: 3,085
    And this thread has turned in to a discussion that JD would be proud of it would seem, some of the recent comments especially by one member make me want to bash my brains against the wall in despair. (not you nolly, that is a terrible situation with a weirdo who just happens to be a lesbian)

  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    Lol

  • Sponsored links:



  • BIG_ROB
    BIG_ROB Posts: 5,274
    Meh
  • Loco
    Loco Posts: 1,037
    I'm losing count of the amount of times I've said so it must be getting boring, the press should not be reporting arrests for this sort of offence only convictions. Once this sort of news comes out it will affect a persons (male or female) ability to carry on a normal life. The rules have to change.
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    I still would don't even need a pic
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    On the oats anything is possible nla
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    Without a doubt pal
  • masicat
    masicat Posts: 5,008
    Covered End said:

    Off_it said:

    masicat said:

    We all know what's going on here. "Innocent until proven guilty". Also, "Not charged doesn't mean not guilty"....... No smoke without fire bla bla bla....

    Sorry, not sure i get you there.
    He probably doesn't get it either :-)
    He does, legally about once a month......

  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,759
    Loco said:

    I'm losing count of the amount of times I've said so it must be getting boring, the press should not be reporting arrests for this sort of offence only convictions. Once this sort of news comes out it will affect a persons (male or female) ability to carry on a normal life. The rules have to change.

    Couldn't agree more.
  • masicat
    masicat Posts: 5,008
    Is Jim still a Freemason?
  • bingaddick
    bingaddick Posts: 8,184
    Leroy Ambrose said:

    Hang on a minute - what's the difference between the hand-wringing going on here about Jim Davidson, and people queueing up to have a pop at that bloke from Lost Prophets a few weeks back? You're either innocent until proven guilty and have your privacy protected, or you aren't, and don't. Witness Operation Ore from a few years ago, where the gavvers ruined lives (and in some cases, led to suicides) on completely misinterpreted 'evidence' of child abuse that was no such thing.

    PS: Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not comparing either of the two cases, suggesting that either JD or the other bloke are guilty/not guilty, or passing comment on the validity of either allegation. Nor do I find it palatable that some people are clearly gleeful at the fact that a person they may not particularly like has been caught up in this.

    This!!
  • bingaddick
    bingaddick Posts: 8,184
    The Police have a duty to investigate allegations - its a simple as that. Its up to the CPS to decide to pursue a case in court and a jury to decide whether somebody is guilty. That's how it works.

    All the Police are doing is their duty.

    I worry about the privacy intrusion for yet unsubstantiated allegations where the Police haven't even remotely finished investigating, let alone the CPS deciding to go to trial.

Categories

“Marketplace”