Think I am the only person I know who think Murray should not win ok he won Wimbledon but what else has he done this year
I will never forget Anyone But England
First British male to win Wimbledon in 77 years. He was also losing finalist in the Australian Open. In other words finalist in 2 of the 4 tennis Grand Slams. He didn't play the French and, given his subsequent operation, probably wasn't fully fit for the US.
Farah is the other main contender for me. Two World golds and two Olympic golds at 5,000 and 10,000 metres is some achievement and only one other man has done it.
My choice? Murray purely because of the media pressure on all half decent tennis players to win Wimbledon. He has finally lain that ghost for a while.
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
Trouble is Justin Rose is there on the basis of just winning one thing this year...
Same with Chris Froome he won a few smaller events but he only won a single "major" event in cycling this year, true he he won the Tour of Oman / Critérium International / Tour de Romandie / Critérium du Dauphiné but these could equate to a Masters event in Tennis
Andy Murray though at the time of Wimbledon, had the US Open and has Olympic Gold (pretty much holding three of the last 5 majors prior to this years US Open in a field dominated by Federer / Nadal and Djokovic)
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
No he didnt. As the journalist who ran the story first said
"Forgive me if you've heard this before, but before the last World Cup finals I interviewed Murray and Tim Henman together for the first time. Murray was late joining the conversation and dropped into his chair midway through a chat about the impending football World Cup.
Naturally, we immediately teased him about Scotland's absence from the competition. As Henman snorted with laughter, I asked Murray what he would be doing while we all watched the World Cup. Reading a good book, perhaps?
With the appropriate degree of sarcasm, Murray replied by saying he would be 'supporting whoever England were playing against'. So we mocked him some more and moved on. It appeared as a transcript in this paper, exactly as the conversation took place, and the entire exchange was obviously a joke."
Just get over it. Even if it wasn't a joke and was deadly serious he still deserves to win SPOTY for what he has achieved.
If a male wins Wimbledon for the first time in nearly 80 years, and didnt win SPOTY, them something would be very wrong somewhere (either that or England have won the World Cup). It isnt going to be a cyclist again, otherwise it is in danger of being called Cyclist Personality of The Year. We didnt have a British F1 Champion. Olympics was last year, so atheltics isnt as much in the limelight. Ashes wins are not as exciting as they would have been 10 years ago. And the football team are still a bunch of losers / chavs / twats *delete as appropriate. It has to be / should therfore be Murray by default.
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
a) Your quoting a newspaper that will try and stir up hysteria for no reason - recently they tried to so similar because of a comment BDL made at half time b) It was quite clearly a joke c) It was quite clearly a joke d) Given that most of the rest of the nation thinks Murray deserves it shows how ridiculous you are being
I understand its the first time in years but its 1 tournament and what has he done for the rest of the season, he is evens to be knighted to its ridiculous
Linford Christie won it one year for 10 seconds' work so Murray by comparison has been slaving away
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
So, you don't care what the journalist said in the link Matt_Wright posted, you just assume it's a cover up and Murray pretended it was a joke as a PR exercise?
Admitting you're wrong often gets you respect, but sometimes it is your only option.
Can't believe there is not many people hoping fo AP McCoy to win. What that guy has achieved is unparalleled in both his sport and all sports worldwide, his achievement will not be bettered. Surely that demands some recognition.
Yes Murray won wimbledon and held another title at the time, but if a different brit burst on the scene and wins wimbledon next year, do they automatically win it or is it just murrays luck that british tennis players have been that poor for circa 80 years prior to his emergence.
I don't like Andy Murray much, well I don't know him of course but I don't find his public persona particularly engaging. However before he won any of his Grand Slam titles I thought the best thing he ever did was his anti England comment. It WAS a joke but even if it wasn't good for him for being truthful. We are allowed to slag off Scotland but they are not to do the same? Ridiculous. Healthy rivalry and that is all it is. Any Scot sitting there saying he hopes England progress well in anything would just make themself look silly.
Even if he said that he hated Charlton, David Bowie, Michael Caine and SE9 he still deserves to win this award.
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
So, you don't care what the journalist said in the link Matt_Wright posted, you just assume it's a cover up and Murray pretended it was a joke as a PR exercise?
Admitting you're wrong often gets you respect, but sometimes it is your only option.
Allowing people to have their own views and opinions is a respect winner too
I don't like Andy Murray much, well I don't know him of course but I don't find his public persona particularly engaging. However before he won any of his Grand Slam titles I thought the best thing he ever did was his anti England comment. It WAS a joke but even if it wasn't good for him for being truthful. We are allowed to slag off Scotland but they are not to do the same? Ridiculous. Healthy rivalry and that is all it is. Any Scot sitting there saying he hopes England progress well in anything would just make themself look silly.
Even if he said that he hated Charlton, David Bowie, Michael Caine and SE9 he still deserves to win this award.
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
So, you don't care what the journalist said in the link Matt_Wright posted, you just assume it's a cover up and Murray pretended it was a joke as a PR exercise?
Admitting you're wrong often gets you respect, but sometimes it is your only option.
Allowing people to have their own views and opinions is a respect winner too
Ah, the old "I'm allowed a view! Free speech!" argument. Yes. People are allowed their view. They are also allowed to disagree. You'll notice I didn't say anyone was wrong, just that sometimes we have to admit that we are. I've made an inference, admittedly, but it was to provoke thought, not shut anyone down. Happy now?
I suspect large amounts of the public will not know exactly what most of these people have won or even who Hannah Cockcroft is. Most people will however know what Murray and Froome won, and this gives them an advantage.
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
will never forget his comments he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
So, you don't care what the journalist said in the link Matt_Wright posted, you just assume it's a cover up and Murray pretended it was a joke as a PR exercise?
Admitting you're wrong often gets you respect, but sometimes it is your only option.
Allowing people to have their own views and opinions is a respect winner too
Like AM being aloud to support the team England are playing as it’s football rivalry?
This used to be a nice little programme on a Wednesday night from BBC TV centre with just the elite of sport in the audience. Some good humorous interviews and demonstrations. A good review of the years sport from BBC's coverage.
Trouble is they don't have a lot.
Agreed it does seem to more about interviewing each contender and always making sure the votes are coming in.
Murray will win and I'd go for Farah 2nd/Froome 3rd.
Comments
Ennis 2nd, Murray 3rd.
Farah is the other main contender for me. Two World golds and two Olympic golds at 5,000 and 10,000 metres is some achievement and only one other man has done it.
My choice? Murray purely because of the media pressure on all half decent tennis players to win Wimbledon. He has finally lain that ghost for a while.
You can not want Andy Murray to be successful for a variety of reasons, but you shouldn't be ignorant in the face of a deliberate misrepresentation by a tabloid desperate to sell papers.
And yet people wonder why the majority of sportsmen - and Murray in particular has been accused of this - resort to clichés and blandness.
Rothko will tell you why she isn't a drugs cheat but Rio Ferdinand is.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/5128028.stm
will never forget his comments
he only said it was a joke because his PR told him to after getting so much abuse
Same with Chris Froome he won a few smaller events but he only won a single "major" event in cycling this year, true he he won the Tour of Oman / Critérium International / Tour de Romandie / Critérium du Dauphiné but these could equate to a Masters event in Tennis
Andy Murray though at the time of Wimbledon, had the US Open and has Olympic Gold (pretty much holding three of the last 5 majors prior to this years US Open in a field dominated by Federer / Nadal and Djokovic)
the reporter put it on murray giving him stick for scotland not qualifying. and he gave a bit back. nothing more than harmless 'banter'.
No he didnt. As the journalist who ran the story first said
"Forgive me if you've heard this before, but before the last World Cup finals I interviewed Murray and Tim Henman together for the first time. Murray was late joining the conversation and dropped into his chair midway through a chat about the impending football World Cup.
Naturally, we immediately teased him about Scotland's absence from the competition. As Henman snorted with laughter, I asked Murray what he would be doing while we all watched the World Cup. Reading a good book, perhaps?
With the appropriate degree of sarcasm, Murray replied by saying he would be 'supporting whoever England were playing against'. So we mocked him some more and moved on. It appeared as a transcript in this paper, exactly as the conversation took place, and the entire exchange was obviously a joke."
Just get over it. Even if it wasn't a joke and was deadly serious he still deserves to win SPOTY for what he has achieved.
Blimey - Paulie, he didnt exactly murder anyone!
b) It was quite clearly a joke
c) It was quite clearly a joke
d) Given that most of the rest of the nation thinks Murray deserves it shows how ridiculous you are being
Admitting you're wrong often gets you respect, but sometimes it is your only option.
Yes Murray won wimbledon and held another title at the time, but if a different brit burst on the scene and wins wimbledon next year, do they automatically win it or is it just murrays luck that british tennis players have been that poor for circa 80 years prior to his emergence.
Even if he said that he hated Charlton, David Bowie, Michael Caine and SE9 he still deserves to win this award.
Yes. People are allowed their view. They are also allowed to disagree.
You'll notice I didn't say anyone was wrong, just that sometimes we have to admit that we are.
I've made an inference, admittedly, but it was to provoke thought, not shut anyone down.
Happy now?
Who cares whether he supports England or not? Many English people don't even support them!
I suspect large amounts of the public will not know exactly what most of these people have won or even who Hannah Cockcroft is. Most people will however know what Murray and Froome won, and this gives them an advantage.
Agreed it does seem to more about interviewing each contender and always making sure the votes are coming in.
Murray will win and I'd go for Farah 2nd/Froome 3rd.
But Murray will win by a country mile.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-2514455/Rory-McIlroy-wants-Australia-win-Ashes-England.html?ico=sport^headlines