Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New kit next season (picture on Page 36)

191012141540

Comments

  • The font used for the sponsor logo makes it more Welling than Charlton
  • Nug said:

    Be pretty easy to do this wouldn't it?

    image

    That makes it look so much nicer when the logo is put on properly, why did they not do that?
  • robroy said:


    Am i right in saying people voted for this on the trust?

    No, there was a poll on the Trust site and got five votes out of 40. The winner got 23

  • Ross said:

    I guess they had everything sorted for the kit apart from the sponsor, and this was the quickest and cheapest way to put in on.

    I believe it is Arial in 142pt.

    If they heat pressed that type onto the shirts in vinyl which they probably have done for a one-off, they could just as easily cut the greenwich logo in vinyl, no brainer really if the plan is to use the real logo.
  • Really budget look to the UoG on the front, not a huge fan of the red shorts either. But as I'm not 14 years old, and therefore not still wearing replica shirts, I'm not overly bothered.
  • Nail on head Scoham, I reckon it will be and third will be all black or all yellow
  • Nug said:

    Be pretty easy to do this wouldn't it?

    image

    Send it to the club.
  • Nug's version is much better. Red shorts are wrong in my opinion
  • @nug shirt looks better but after thinking about it for some 22 minutes, I have decided that I will purchase the socks....
  • Sponsored links:


  • Nug version of the logo is by far better.

    I don't like the white, and doubt I'll buy that. I'll await the image of the away shirt to see if buy one at all.
  • I dont mind it and it doesn't bother me what it looks like. At 27 im too old to wear one anyway.
  • I don't usually care about the kit, but that is far too much white!
  • I dont mind it and it doesn't bother me what it looks like. At 27 im too old to wear one anyway.

    That's what @Riscardo said.

  • Its alright.
  • The Belgian Crew
  • St Helens rugby top with zero thought put into the Sponsors logo.

    It's a No from me Dermot.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Looks a lot better with the proper UoG logo more professional like !
  • Like it.
    However, the proper UoG logo looks a lot more classy.
  • I like the design I just think it's to white, Hopefully the away kit is same design with some better colours.
  • edited June 2014
    Nothing wrong with it except it's not a proper Charlton shirt. Seeing as Tony and Mike signed us up with Nike, I presume I don't even get the pleasure of blaming it on Duchatelet.
  • Well, there's 40 quid of my money they won't be getting.
  • More ammo for the G21?
  • Too white. I don't really care though, would prefer a picture of a player or twelve
  • I have a feeling the red shorts are all about getting advertising on there...
  • When are the away and third kits released? Kind of rules either of those being white with so much white on the home it doesn't it? I'll go for one being black and the other being yellow…maybe a blue in there somewhere. Anything but grey.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!