I think it's a nice shirt - not for us as it shouldn't really have white sleeves. Having said that I could live with it. Hopefully they will change the Logo on the front, even if they don't add the logo, the university'd own font would look better.
I'm not as against the other two logos either. I don't, personally, like Andrews but the logo is a lot less offensive where it is and Mitsubishi is the kind of company that I would like us to be sponsored by as it's a known brand.
Overall, apart from the Arsenal sleeves, I think it's ok.
We don't wear red shorts. I can't understand how they could have got that wrong. I can't see any commercial benefit to it either - I mean I don't think people are going to go out and buy red shorts when they wouldn't have bought white or black (or what ever the away colour would be).
I really like the socks though. I think I will buy a pair for my Dad. In the 70s he had a pair of socks like them which he called his lucky football socks. they were rotten by then - he'd probably had them for 20 years by that point. Back in the days when I used to play FIFA and we could change the kits I always used to give us hooped socks.
£10.49 on here. You can buy an iron-on Charlton badge on Ebay for £3.50. Cracking opportunity for unlicensed street traders to make a few quid on a matchday next season.
Can't say I'm impressed... Like many have already pointed out, it looks more like an away shirt for us. If I had to choose between this one and last season's, I'd prefer the latter.
What makes the kit rugby league? I ask not because I disagree, but because I don't know much about rugby and since I'm from a country with very little rugby
Can't believe I still look at this site. Although I kind of knew what I would be letting myself in for. Get a bloody life it's a progressive different kit! For the last 3 new kits have been basically the same boring design! At least this one has a bit of difference about it!
Its not very "Charlton" but overall I don't think its terrible. It looks quite smart with the red shorts. I'll wait and see what the away and third kits look like though.
Comments
What the f***ing
What the f***ing
What the f***ing hell is that?
What the f***ing hell is that?
Or Twente's. Nike are capable of getting it right…
I'm not as against the other two logos either. I don't, personally, like Andrews but the logo is a lot less offensive where it is and Mitsubishi is the kind of company that I would like us to be sponsored by as it's a known brand.
Overall, apart from the Arsenal sleeves, I think it's ok.
We don't wear red shorts. I can't understand how they could have got that wrong. I can't see any commercial benefit to it either - I mean I don't think people are going to go out and buy red shorts when they wouldn't have bought white or black (or what ever the away colour would be).
I really like the socks though. I think I will buy a pair for my Dad. In the 70s he had a pair of socks like them which he called his lucky football socks. they were rotten by then - he'd probably had them for 20 years by that point. Back in the days when I used to play FIFA and we could change the kits I always used to give us hooped socks.
No more pictures of football shirts from me I promise!
Obviously too much white on shirt, too much red on shorts.
Socks are good though.
I'll wait and see what the away and third kits look like though.
I make that 7 new kits in three seasons (or just over two years).