Surrey ccc
Comments
-
Really good over from Pope that. Impressive. 3 fours in a row to finish the over.3
-
177 going into the final over. Curran on strike. Pope 24 from 12. Curran 5 from 31
-
Good little innings from Pope here!1
-
Very well bowled last over. 181-7 we finish.0
-
Tom was caught off the last ball. I have a feeling 181 is slightly below par here0
-
Not as many as i would have liked but not that bad either.
K rep the faith come on the Rey1 -
1-2 somerset. Brilliant start. Dernbach on a hat trick. Very low battery. Signing out guys3
-
Dernbach on his day is still absolute quality1
-
Thanks for the updates mate1
-
What a first couple of overs!!!!!1
- Sponsored links:
-
Is this Steve Davies the same Steven Davies that played for us or is it the other one? I believe they have 2 keepers by the same name. Or am I getting confused?0
-
I think it's the one who played for uscantersaddick said:Is this Steve Davies the same Steven Davies that played for us or is it the other one? I believe they have 2 keepers by the same name. Or am I getting confused?
0 -
@Frontline9 I'd be interested if you have any comments on Burns keeping. I haven't seen him keep. I'd been led to believe that they'd decided he would no longer be considered a keeper and he accepted that. I was also led to believe that Pope was considered second choice there. So bit perplexed by the decision.0
-
Post a square leg and a mid wicket and sooner or later he will chip one straight to them.blackpool72 said:
I think it's the one who played for uscantersaddick said:Is this Steve Davies the same Steven Davies that played for us or is it the other one? I believe they have 2 keepers by the same name. Or am I getting confused?
0 -
As I say that he goes LBWcantersaddick said:
Post a square leg and a mid wicket and sooner or later he will chip one straight to them.blackpool72 said:
I think it's the one who played for uscantersaddick said:Is this Steve Davies the same Steven Davies that played for us or is it the other one? I believe they have 2 keepers by the same name. Or am I getting confused?
1 -
Required rate more than 11!0
-
What's the score cants0
-
33-3 from 5.4 149 needed0
-
Make that 33-4 as Rampaul gets Hose1
-
I have nightmares of Van Der Merwe from the one day cup. Surely he can't do it to us twice..0
- Sponsored links:
-
TC gets Trego 33-50
-
1
-
Come on cants give us a wicket1
-
149 needed from 13 overs. Both batsmen on 0 all of the top 5 gone.0
-
TC 2 overs 0 runs 2 wickets so far! Incredible!0
-
Pope was named on Friday to play keeper mate but last minute we changed it to Burns. I think he's been average both games to be honest. Not quite Foakes but he's okay.cantersaddick said:@Frontline9 I'd be interested if you have any comments on Burns keeping. I haven't seen him keep. I'd been led to believe that they'd decided he would no longer be considered a keeper and he accepted that. I was also led to believe that Pope was considered second choice there. So bit perplexed by the decision.
1 -
Got battery now guys, back with you.1
-
42-5 off 8.1 overs at the moment. TC bowled 2 overs. 2 maidens. 2 wickets. #stats1
-
I think this Van Der Merve is the one who destroyed us in the Royal London Cup1
-
As I say that. He goes!!!! 49-6!!2
