Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Surrey ccc

19192949697190

Comments

  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    I'm being well spoilt here watching England batter the Saffers currently 64 for 5.
    And getting updates on Surrey beating Essex.
    Happy days.
  • Chef_addick
    Chef_addick Posts: 2,196
    40 minutes on the train with no signal and we've taken 4 wicket's, surely it's 2 wins on the spin from here!
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Awful over from Borthwick. Went for about 16 there
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Think we're going to do this!! Got to go some to mess this up
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Could do with Corey Anderson going here
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    WICKET - 82/7!
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    No luck for the spinners here. All pace. Dernbach 2 wickets, TC 2 wickets, SC 1 wicket and RR 1 wicket
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Big hit from Corey Anderson. 90-1 off 12 overs. 92 needed from 8 overs
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    35 for Anderson now from 18 balls
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    I can sense another wicket coming
  • Sponsored links:



  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Once Anderson goes, it's a done deal
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    77 from 5.5 overs needed
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    WICKET! Overton gone. Good catch from Stoneman, almost a 6. 105-8
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679

    WICKET! Overton gone. Good catch from Stoneman, almost a 6. 105-8

    Told ya :)
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    108-8. 74 needed from 5 hours
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Biggest shot of the day from Corey Anderson there. HUGE six
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    no ball from ravi - free hit coming...
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Almost caught but wouldnt of been out
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    122-8. 60 from 4 overs needed
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679

    122-8. 60 from 4 overs needed

    Tall order when you are 8 down
  • Sponsored links:



  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764

    122-8. 60 from 4 overs needed

    Tall order when you are 8 down
    Very big ask. Especially with TC and Jade bowling. We all know what their death bowling is like
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    131-8 3 overs left. 51 needed from 3 overs.
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Another big 6 from Anderson. Seriously impressive this from him.
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    ANOTHER big 6 - biggest of the day. Gone miles
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    39 from 16 balls
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Surely not
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    39 from 15 balls...
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,927
    Was an odd decision when we had them 5 down and had 2 batsmen on 0 to bring on Sibley and Borthwick. Our 5th and 6th bowlers.

    My view is when they are down kick them and keep kicking.another 2 quick wickets then would have killed them.
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    38 from 14 balls
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764

    Was an odd decision when we had them 5 down and had 2 batsmen on 0 to bring on Sibley and Borthwick. Our 5th and 6th bowlers.

    My view is when they are down kick them and keep kicking.another 2 quick wickets then would have killed them.

    agree, this may cost us.