The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Second bloke is the financier Donald Muir1
-
That's what I thought, an account to ignore then.BigRedEvil said:Old photo saw it posted a few years ago when protests were ongoing
0 -
What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.0
-
The latter is the most likely accompaniment to Alex McCleish (Donald). Will definitely be him.
1 -
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/13050158.Donald_Muir__the_bank_s_inside_man_at_Ibrox__has_questions_to_answer/
"Muir described himself as a Rangers supporter and a guy who cared about the club. He was Alex McLeish's mate."1 -
Not sure what this all means though.
Some prospective buyer is getting Donald Muir to oversee the deal and Alex McCleish is coming in as manager? I don't get it.0 -
McCleish was a guest of Murray, why he’s sat down there I don’t know, might just prefer it.NapaAddick said:What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.
1 -
Got a great feeling about this1
-
I posted that a couple years backScoham said:Real or an old photo and wind up? Feel like I may have seen the photo before.
6 -
Could be a case of them being in London and coming along to the game, who knows at this stage.Leeds_Addick said:Not sure what this all means though.
Some prospective buyer is getting Donald Muir to oversee the deal and Alex McCleish is coming in as manager? I don't get it.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Doesn't necessarily mean Murray is involved though. Could have been his guest as Murray is trying to sell the club to McLeish's mates? We don't even know Murray is part of any group trying to buy the club do we?cafc_harry said:
McCleish was a guest of Murray, why he’s sat down there I don’t know, might just prefer it.NapaAddick said:What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.
1 -
So has it been confirmed that McGleish was at the Valley purely as a guest of Murray? If it has, why was the Rangers bloke there?cafc_harry said:
McCleish was a guest of Murray, why he’s sat down there I don’t know, might just prefer it.NapaAddick said:What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.
0 -
Guessing these two are the two Airman referred to as being guests of Murray. Plot thickens deeper in the fact he’s chosen not to sit with them too ...cafc_harry said:
Could be a case of them being in London and coming along to the game, who knows at this stage.Leeds_Addick said:Not sure what this all means though.
Some prospective buyer is getting Donald Muir to oversee the deal and Alex McCleish is coming in as manager? I don't get it.0 -
Why would they want to go and see Charlton vs Oldham in league 1?cafc_harry said:
Could be a case of them being in London and coming along to the game, who knows at this stage.Leeds_Addick said:Not sure what this all means though.
Some prospective buyer is getting Donald Muir to oversee the deal and Alex McCleish is coming in as manager? I don't get it.
Us fans don't even really wanna go!23 -
This is key, Muir being there tells me it's business related.i_b_b_o_r_g said:
So has it been confirmed that McGleish was at the Valley purely as a guest of Murray? If it has, why was the Rangers bloke there?cafc_harry said:
McCleish was a guest of Murray, why he’s sat down there I don’t know, might just prefer it.NapaAddick said:What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.
3 -
Me too mateLeeds_Addick said:
This is key, Muir being there tells me it's business related.i_b_b_o_r_g said:
So has it been confirmed that McGleish was at the Valley purely as a guest of Murray? If it has, why was the Rangers bloke there?cafc_harry said:
McCleish was a guest of Murray, why he’s sat down there I don’t know, might just prefer it.NapaAddick said:What makes me most happy is that Murray sitting in another part of the box perhaps means he is not involved in any way with this buying group.
2 -
Just to temper expectations.... what some Rangers fans think of Muir... I would be interested if some here know longtime Rangers fans who might be able to give some background.
http://dearscotland.com/2012/05/17/the-rogues-who-ruined-rangers/
https://www.scotsman.com/sport/director-seen-as-enemy-within-ends-association-with-murray-1-1560499
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/rangers-fans-demonstrate-against-donald-10506123 -
I found another photo of him online and he is wearing glasses just like the one taken at the Valley.Addickted said:Second bloke is the financier Donald Muir
2 -
If you don't post a picture for everyone to scrutinise then it doesn't count.flyingkiwiDK said:
I found another photo of him online and he is wearing glasses just like the one taken at the Valley.Addickted said:Second bloke is the financier Donald Muir
1 -
I'm lost, can someone please summarise. Because at the moment this is where i am at:
There is a Muir in the stands, possibly Donald who is Scottish (and Napa reckons he's got money) or possibly Andrew who is Australian (and by general consensus has money). Although both Muirs might be there.
McCleish is a coach and has previous with Donald at Rangers.
If Andrew is in the picture the Australian bid is still on.
But the Australian bid is off.
Murray has a Scottish sounding name (and there's a river called the Murray in Oz) but irrespective he is not sitting with the Scottish nor Australian Muir. Meaning he is not connected to either bids.
There is no Scottish bid.
How far off am I?
Seriously though can we please summarise the Muir situation .
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Ackworth suggesting on Facebook that Belgian investor Ivan de Witte was also sitting in the VIP section on sat.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_De_Witte
6 -
I heard that one of Richard Murrays invitees was an ex-director, so if there were two, at least one might be a familiar face.1
-
Tried to but I’m having issues with my phone at the moment.Beardface said:
If you don't post a picture for everyone to scrutinise then it doesn't count.flyingkiwiDK said:
I found another photo of him online and he is wearing glasses just like the one taken at the Valley.Addickted said:Second bloke is the financier Donald Muir
1 -
Alex Mcleish was sitting with Donald Muir there who worked for Lloyds and was made director at Rangers to get the money back that Rangers owned Lloyds. I don't think there's any reason to believe that he has money and certainly not that he's buying the club.KiwiValley said:I'm lost, can someone please summarise. Because at the moment this is where i am at:
There is a Muir in the stands, possibly Donald who is Scottish (and Napa reckons he's got money) or possibly Andrew who is Australian (and by general consensus has money). Although both Muirs might be there.
McCleish is a coach and has previous with Donald at Rangers.
If Andrew is in the picture the Australian bid is still on.
But the Australian bid is off.
Murray has a Scottish sounding name (and there's a river called the Murray in Oz) but irrespective he is not sitting with the Scottish nor Australian Muir. Meaning he is not connected to either bids.
There is no Scottish bid.
How far off am I?
Seriously though can we please summarise the Muir situation .
I think the suggestion is that Donald Muir is connected to one of the bids (the british one?) but he is not the person with the money for it.3 -
I think Donald Muir is fronting a bid from South Africans.2
-
I read that Mcgleish was the guest that’s about all I know, at the time I read it I didn’t know who Muir was/ that he was there.0
-
Ok it's Ackworth, but this is what I have feared all along, douchbag "selling" to one of his mates. Lets hope this is a typical JA exclusive.flyingkiwiDK said:Ackworth suggesting on Facebook that Belgian investor Ivan de Witte was also sitting in the VIP section on sat.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_De_Witte0 -
There you go, must be a reason he was with the other 2 though. Who is it on the left?sammy391 said:0 -
12
-
Nor would you if you came from Oldham.iamdan said:1