Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
RD will sell. He ain’t going to stomach £1m loss each month for long. And if he had plans to stay he’d be needing to replace the CEO & CFO When those positions are advertised is the time to worry
The question of what happens to Lee Bowyer when the season ends is coming down the track too. Duchatelet can’t appoint a manager under current circumstances and I doubt if Bowyer would be impressed with being caretaker over a close season.
And if Leeds move Heckingbottom on we could have the perfect storm.
Clubs are not allowed to appoint any individual who has already held an interim position but not achieved the required qualifications. Leeds could not appoint Bowyer, even if they wanted to do so.
bowyer has the uefa B licence meaning he can manage anyone from the championship and below.
That’s not true. It is allowed in League One providing the manager is working towards the A licence. An A licence is required on appointment in the Championship. As it stands, he could not be appointed by Leeds. It’s a bit of a moot point since they are unlikely to want to appoint him anyway.
“Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim position until they have acquired the required qualifications.”
Doesn't that mean an interim position at the appointing club?
I think the wording is intended to cover a second interim appointment at any club.
40.1.1 all Managers in the Championship must hold a minimum of the UEFA A Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA Pro-Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.1.2 all Managers in League 1 and League 2 must hold a minimum of the UEFA B Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA A Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.2 Where a Club is promoted from League One to the Championship and that Club’s Manager does not hold the UEFA A Licence, the Manager shall have until 31st July in the following Season in which to obtain the UEFA A Licence.
40.3 Where a Club appoints a Manager on an interim basis that individual does not need to meet the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 above provided always that this dispensation shall not last beyond the end of the Season in which they are appointed. Further, Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim Manager position at a Club under this Regulation unless and until such time as they have acquired the qualification(s) required under Regulation 40.1.
Hence, under 40.2 Bowyer could manage Charlton in the Championship next season (providing that his status on promotion is acceptable under these rules) but under 40.1.1 he could not be appointed at Leeds, even on an interim basis (without getting an A licence).
The bit I’ve put in bold refers to interim appointments under this regulation (ie Regulation 40.3). That doesn’t apply to Bowyer as, in his current role, he meets the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 ( ie holds a UEFA B licence [Regulation 40.1.2] which is all that is required in League 1). As he’s not been employed under Regulation 40.3, he can be employed by anyone in the Championship under Regulation 40.3 next year.
If I were a lawyer for a club wanting to employ him, that would be my argument and I’d expect to win.
RD will sell. He ain’t going to stomach £1m loss each month for long. And if he had plans to stay he’d be needing to replace the CEO & CFO When those positions are advertised is the time to worry
The question of what happens to Lee Bowyer when the season ends is coming down the track too. Duchatelet can’t appoint a manager under current circumstances and I doubt if Bowyer would be impressed with being caretaker over a close season.
And if Leeds move Heckingbottom on we could have the perfect storm.
Clubs are not allowed to appoint any individual who has already held an interim position but not achieved the required qualifications. Leeds could not appoint Bowyer, even if they wanted to do so.
bowyer has the uefa B licence meaning he can manage anyone from the championship and below.
That’s not true. It is allowed in League One providing the manager is working towards the A licence. An A licence is required on appointment in the Championship. As it stands, he could not be appointed by Leeds. It’s a bit of a moot point since they are unlikely to want to appoint him anyway.
“Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim position until they have acquired the required qualifications.”
Doesn't that mean an interim position at the appointing club?
I think the wording is intended to cover a second interim appointment at any club.
40.1.1 all Managers in the Championship must hold a minimum of the UEFA A Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA Pro-Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.1.2 all Managers in League 1 and League 2 must hold a minimum of the UEFA B Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA A Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.2 Where a Club is promoted from League One to the Championship and that Club’s Manager does not hold the UEFA A Licence, the Manager shall have until 31st July in the following Season in which to obtain the UEFA A Licence.
40.3 Where a Club appoints a Manager on an interim basis that individual does not need to meet the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 above provided always that this dispensation shall not last beyond the end of the Season in which they are appointed. Further, Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim Manager position at a Club under this Regulation unless and until such time as they have acquired the qualification(s) required under Regulation 40.1.
Hence, under 40.2 Bowyer could manage Charlton in the Championship next season (providing that his status on promotion is acceptable under these rules) but under 40.1.1 he could not be appointed at Leeds, even on an interim basis (without getting an A licence).
The bit I’ve put in bold refers to interim appointments under this regulation (ie Regulation 40.3). That doesn’t apply to Bowyer as, in his current role, he meets the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 ( ie holds a UEFA B licence [Regulation 40.1.2] which is all that is required in League 1). As he’s not been employed under Regulation 40.3, he can be employed by anyone in the Championship under Regulation 40.3 next year.
If I were a lawyer for a club wanting to employ him, that would be my argument and I’d expect to win.
I’ll concede half of that. I agree he could be appointed on an interim basis by a Championship club because he isn’t covered by 40.3 at present.
But 40.3 relates exclusively to interim appointments. Whether or not “interim” is defined is a separate issue, but you can’t use a regulation about interim appointments to make a permanent one.
There is no provision in the rules for coaches with only a B licence to be appointed permanently at existing Championship clubs.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
Right after the ones saying there was no due diligence and the club wasn't for sale.
I don't know why anyone wants Roland to sell, have you guys not seen that we have improved our ranking with the new manager. Katie was right all along!
RD will sell. He ain’t going to stomach £1m loss each month for long. And if he had plans to stay he’d be needing to replace the CEO & CFO When those positions are advertised is the time to worry
The question of what happens to Lee Bowyer when the season ends is coming down the track too. Duchatelet can’t appoint a manager under current circumstances and I doubt if Bowyer would be impressed with being caretaker over a close season.
And if Leeds move Heckingbottom on we could have the perfect storm.
Clubs are not allowed to appoint any individual who has already held an interim position but not achieved the required qualifications. Leeds could not appoint Bowyer, even if they wanted to do so.
bowyer has the uefa B licence meaning he can manage anyone from the championship and below.
That’s not true. It is allowed in League One providing the manager is working towards the A licence. An A licence is required on appointment in the Championship. As it stands, he could not be appointed by Leeds. It’s a bit of a moot point since they are unlikely to want to appoint him anyway.
“Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim position until they have acquired the required qualifications.”
Doesn't that mean an interim position at the appointing club?
I think the wording is intended to cover a second interim appointment at any club.
40.1.1 all Managers in the Championship must hold a minimum of the UEFA A Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA Pro-Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.1.2 all Managers in League 1 and League 2 must hold a minimum of the UEFA B Licence and be working towards completing the UEFA A Licence within 3 years of appointment.
40.2 Where a Club is promoted from League One to the Championship and that Club’s Manager does not hold the UEFA A Licence, the Manager shall have until 31st July in the following Season in which to obtain the UEFA A Licence.
40.3 Where a Club appoints a Manager on an interim basis that individual does not need to meet the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 above provided always that this dispensation shall not last beyond the end of the Season in which they are appointed. Further, Clubs may not appoint any individual who has already held an interim Manager position at a Club under this Regulation unless and until such time as they have acquired the qualification(s) required under Regulation 40.1.
Hence, under 40.2 Bowyer could manage Charlton in the Championship next season (providing that his status on promotion is acceptable under these rules) but under 40.1.1 he could not be appointed at Leeds, even on an interim basis (without getting an A licence).
The bit I’ve put in bold refers to interim appointments under this regulation (ie Regulation 40.3). That doesn’t apply to Bowyer as, in his current role, he meets the qualifications set out in Regulation 40.1 ( ie holds a UEFA B licence [Regulation 40.1.2] which is all that is required in League 1). As he’s not been employed under Regulation 40.3, he can be employed by anyone in the Championship under Regulation 40.3 next year.
If I were a lawyer for a club wanting to employ him, that would be my argument and I’d expect to win.
I’ll concede half of that. I agree he could be appointed on an interim basis by a Championship club because he isn’t covered by 40.3 at present.
But 40.3 relates exclusively to interim appointments. Whether or not “interim” is defined is a separate issue, but you can’t use a regulation about interim appointments to make a permanent one.
There is no provision in the rules for coaches with only a B licence to be appointed permanently at existing Championship clubs.
Yeah I know. But the question surely is whether Leeds could employ him? And they could, as an interim appointment for the first year while he does his A badge. Once he passes, his appointment is made permanent. If he fails to pass, he can’t stay on unless Leeds are relegated, in which case I’d doubt they’d want to keep him on anyway. But if he did fail to pass, he’d have to take a job below the championship or return to an assistant’s role. It seems to me the rules regarding interim appointments are purely designed to stop coaches holding jobs that are above their qualified status for more than one year. Which seems reasonable to me.
Whether Bowyer’s job at present is considered interim or not, he could be employed in the Championship by Charlton in the provisional sense (Reg 40.2) or by any other club in an interim capacity (Reg 40.3). Either way, he’d clearly need to get his A badge by July 2019 in order to continue at that level in the following season.
I don't know why anyone wants Roland to sell, have you guys not seen that we have improved our ranking with the new manager. Katie was right all along!
I think we got squirrel face wrong on that line. Ranking was spelt wrong.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
Right after the ones saying there was no due diligence and the club wasn't for sale.
Never said it weren't for sale but please don't bore everyone to death all over again
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
Right after the ones saying there was no due diligence and the club wasn't for sale.
Never said it weren't for sale but please don't bore everyone to death all over again
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Nobody did argue that, but the management set-up remained incompetent as the accounts and the league table set out in vivid detail. This season has been marginally better but the main reason is the further unwinding of any Belgian influence on the football side. One central plank (I use the word advisedly) remained unchanged - too much reliance on too many inexperienced young players.
I hope we do go up but that is by no means guaranteed and finishing fifth or sixth after the vast amounts of money spent by L1 standards remains a poor overall performance.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
There's no way Duchâtelet won't still be owner next season.
double negative or just bad use of the English language. I'm not sure if you mean that that there is no way that he will still be the owner next season or that there is no way that he will not be the owner next season.
Fwiw I still think he'll be gone by the summer - when exactly who knows. I suspect (as many people have pointed out recently) that he is still waiting to see which division we will be in, even though that can be factored in to any purchase price.
I blame Bowyer. If he had been like all the rest of our managers under RD then we would be comfortably in mid table, no threat of making the play-offs & therefore would have been sold by now. To be fair, KR did his bit & tried to get the takeover done by end of March but then RD saw through his tactic (like we & all the other opposition mangers did ) and replaced him.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Nobody did argue that, but the management set-up remained incompetent as the accounts and the league table set out in vivid detail. This season has been marginally better but the main reason is the further unwinding of any Belgian influence on the football side. One central plank (I use the word advisedly) remained unchanged - too much reliance on too many inexperienced young players.
I hope we do go up but that is by no means guaranteed and finishing fifth or sixth after the vast amounts of money spent by L1 standards remains a poor overall performance.
trust me, there were plenty who argued there was no change in strategy - the cardigan and his groupies for sure - we even had a debate about what the word strategy meant and goonerhater in the post above - it was clear to those without their head up their arse that the plan had failed, strategy changed to try and get back up and i was told that he would give it two years to do that and then sell up and that is exactly what is happening
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
u can't have it both ways - i said i felt he would sell once the division we are to be in is known and that is argued against and now others say i said he wasn't selling - he has always been selling since relegation but it was never happening last october - 2 years post relegation and then off - and so it will be proved
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Nobody did argue that, but the management set-up remained incompetent as the accounts and the league table set out in vivid detail. This season has been marginally better but the main reason is the further unwinding of any Belgian influence on the football side. One central plank (I use the word advisedly) remained unchanged - too much reliance on too many inexperienced young players.
I hope we do go up but that is by no means guaranteed and finishing fifth or sixth after the vast amounts of money spent by L1 standards remains a poor overall performance.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Nobody did argue that, but the management set-up remained incompetent as the accounts and the league table set out in vivid detail. This season has been marginally better but the main reason is the further unwinding of any Belgian influence on the football side. One central plank (I use the word advisedly) remained unchanged - too much reliance on too many inexperienced young players.
I hope we do go up but that is by no means guaranteed and finishing fifth or sixth after the vast amounts of money spent by L1 standards remains a poor overall performance.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
u can't have it both ways - i said i felt he would sell once the division we are to be in is known and that is argued against and now others say i said he wasn't selling - he has always been selling since relegation but it was never happening last october - 2 years post relegation and then off - and so it will be proved
I suggest you at least try to practice what you preach.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
u can't have it both ways - i said i felt he would sell once the division we are to be in is known and that is argued against and now others say i said he wasn't selling - he has always been selling since relegation but it was never happening last october - 2 years post relegation and then off - and so it will be proved
I suggest you at least try to practice what you preach.
??? think on - he's selling - the price will be better if we are promoted
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
u can't have it both ways - i said i felt he would sell once the division we are to be in is known and that is argued against and now others say i said he wasn't selling - he has always been selling since relegation but it was never happening last october - 2 years post relegation and then off - and so it will be proved
I suggest you at least try to practice what you preach.
??? think on - he's selling - the price will be better if we are promoted
Pretend you haven't changed your stance on the issue as much as you like. You seriously should consider a career in politics. Plausible denial attempts and no shame, you're a natural.
Lets not get worked up about him not selling - all is going in line with what I was told after relegation - and what I said on here - 2 seasons to get us back up but a sale regardless after those 2 years - seen nothing to think that isn't going to be the case
Can you point to the post where you said this two years ago?
It'll be there somewhere - around the summer everyone was rounding on me coz i said there had been a change in strategy, ditching of the network idea to try and get promoted, and I was told I was a beard or something by cardigan boy who was adamant there was no change.
So you spotted they had appointed a British manager and signed British players, which was obvious to everyone? The problem was that they were useless at that too, which some people couldn’t grasp.
You've definitely become more prickly after the last year of printing dud info but don't start on me - it was cardigan claiming no change in strategy yet here we are on the verge of the play offs with no network players, another British manager and a British scouting set up - of course, he could have thrown more money at it last year and this ideally but only the most pig headed would argue no change in strategy since relegation
Current circumstances are down to luck, not design. (I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
u can't have it both ways - i said i felt he would sell once the division we are to be in is known and that is argued against and now others say i said he wasn't selling - he has always been selling since relegation but it was never happening last october - 2 years post relegation and then off - and so it will be proved
I suggest you at least try to practice what you preach.
??? think on - he's selling - the price will be better if we are promoted
Pretend you haven't changed your stance on the issue as much as you like. You seriously should consider a career in politics. Plausible denial attempts and no shame, you're a natural.
I'm not sure he has changed his stance at all, i remember a long time ago him saying exactly what he's saying now.
Reported earlier this week, on other forums, that today will be the day and for us to keep our eyes and ears open and look out for the news! On CL we have the ongoing I said this - you said that argument raging, yet no news on any takeover happening today. Therefore in summary I would suggest that we all just concentrate on tomorrows game, leave the in-fighting on here to those involved, not look for news elsewhere and wait for something to happen, sometime in the future (or not), and try to enjoy the final 2 matches. After more than a year since this thread was started there have been too many false dawns, false hopes and if you include Murray - 'fake news'. Que Serra, Serra!!
Reported earlier this week, on other forums, that today will be the day and for us to keep our eyes and ears open and look out for the news! On CL we have the ongoing I said this - you said that argument raging, yet no news on any takeover happening today. Therefore in summary I would suggest that we all just concentrate on tomorrows game, leave the in-fighting on here to those involved, not look for news elsewhere and wait for something to happen, sometime in the future (or not), and try to enjoy the final 2 matches. After more than a year since this thread was started there have been too many false dawns, false hopes and if you include Murray - 'fake news'. Que Serra, Serra!!
Comments
If I were a lawyer for a club wanting to employ him, that would be my argument and I’d expect to win.
But 40.3 relates exclusively to interim appointments. Whether or not “interim” is defined is a separate issue, but you can’t use a regulation about interim appointments to make a permanent one.
There is no provision in the rules for coaches with only a B licence to be appointed permanently at existing Championship clubs.
It seems to me the rules regarding interim appointments are purely designed to stop coaches holding jobs that are above their qualified status for more than one year. Which seems reasonable to me.
Whether Bowyer’s job at present is considered interim or not, he could be employed in the Championship by Charlton in the provisional sense (Reg 40.2) or by any other club in an interim capacity (Reg 40.3). Either way, he’d clearly need to get his A badge by July 2019 in order to continue at that level in the following season.
I hope you like it:)
I hope we do go up but that is by no means guaranteed and finishing fifth or sixth after the vast amounts of money spent by L1 standards remains a poor overall performance.
(I appreciate you feel facts may bore people so feel free to disregard).
Fwiw I still think he'll be gone by the summer - when exactly who knows. I suspect (as many people have pointed out recently) that he is still waiting to see which division we will be in, even though that can be factored in to any purchase price.
I blame Bowyer. If he had been like all the rest of our managers under RD then we would be comfortably in mid table, no threat of making the play-offs & therefore would have been sold by now. To be fair, KR did his bit & tried to get the takeover done by end of March but then RD saw through his tactic (like we & all the other opposition mangers did
After more than a year since this thread was started there have been too many false dawns, false hopes and if you include Murray - 'fake news'. Que Serra, Serra!!