Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer Transfer Rumours (Non-Charlton Related) - Deadline Day from page 22
Comments
-
I've seen that it's more like £13.5m but have a feeling that could just be a poor currency estimate. Either way something seems genuinely off about it to me. Even with a year left on his contract that's a ludicrously low fee. PSG probably have FFP issues to deal with so may have knocked a bit off but even still I have a feeling they've got some other kind of deal in place.0
-
True but he's 30 and only had 1 year left on his contract so the fee was never going to be that high. Still at that price, i can't believe the likes of Liverpool, Arsenal and City etc weren't in for himThe Red Robin said:
Bargain compared to some of the fees this summer.Callumcafc said:Matuidi to Juventus for £18m.
1 -
They are the masters at getting cheap deals and selling expensive (except Higuain but only because Napoli are even better at it).0
-
Or the owners are so minted that they don't really care what fee Juve pay.cafc_harry said:I've seen that it's more like £13.5m but have a feeling that could just be a poor currency estimate. Either way something seems genuinely off about it to me. Even with a year left on his contract that's a ludicrously low fee. PSG probably have FFP issues to deal with so may have knocked a bit off but even still I have a feeling they've got some other kind of deal in place.
0 -
I was thinking that, team like PSG are the best team to buy from.Callumcafc said:
Or the owners are so minted that they don't really care what fee Juve pay.cafc_harry said:I've seen that it's more like £13.5m but have a feeling that could just be a poor currency estimate. Either way something seems genuinely off about it to me. Even with a year left on his contract that's a ludicrously low fee. PSG probably have FFP issues to deal with so may have knocked a bit off but even still I have a feeling they've got some other kind of deal in place.
1 -
Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......2 -
How much would Matuidi have cost had an English team wanted him though and not Juventus?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......0 -
A lot more.ForeverAddickted said:
How much would Matuidi have cost had an English team wanted him though and not Juventus?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
But when we started paying silly money because a player was English we showed our hand.0 -
I wouldnt even say it was to do with just English players now, its simply the SKY money that the rest of Europe are easily aware of.dizzee said:
A lot more.ForeverAddickted said:
How much would Matuidi have cost had an English team wanted him though and not Juventus?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
But when we started paying silly money because a player was English we showed our hand.
i.e. Drinkwater = £40m | Sigurdsson = £45m
Both are completely different types of Midfielder and both are very good in their respective positions which mean the £5m is probably justified yet should surely be no more than £10m / £15m in reality0 -
In very weird transfer news today; West Brom have turned down an £18m offer from Man City for Jonny Evans.
Of all the CBs out there he's one of the last that you'd expect to be linked to City... I know that Evans has won titles with Man Utd but for City to have a pairing of Stones | Evans and title asperations seem crazy1 - Sponsored links:
-
Even more mental that Millwall's is £2.50. Can't even get a pint for that these daysAthletico Charlton said:
Absolutely mental money for a group of extremely average players none of which I could see being better than lower PL/ upper Championship.Valley11 said:Watford are splashing the cash! £18m on Gray, £11m on that Brazilian forward, £8m on Will Hughes another £8m on Cleverly and £6m on Chalobah.
Mad when you think our record signing is still Jason Euell at £4.75m
Where has drinkwater gone?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......0 -
Nowhere yet - but there is talk of Chelsea.Todds_right_hook said:
Even more mental that Millwall's is £2.50. Can't even get a pint for that these daysAthletico Charlton said:
Absolutely mental money for a group of extremely average players none of which I could see being better than lower PL/ upper Championship.Valley11 said:Watford are splashing the cash! £18m on Gray, £11m on that Brazilian forward, £8m on Will Hughes another £8m on Cleverly and £6m on Chalobah.
Mad when you think our record signing is still Jason Euell at £4.75m
Where has drinkwater gone?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......0 -
£18mill for Evans, what the actual f. How how how. They have rejected it too, how much do they value him at? £20mill+ I presume.
Go home football, you're drunk5 -
Came here to say similar. For anyone that hasn't seen...moutuakilla said:£18mill for Evans, what the actual f. How how how. They have rejected it too, how much do they value him at? £20mill+ I presume.
Go home football, you're drunk
Man City have had an £18m bid for Jonny Evans rejected by WBA.
The one who was average at Man U for 9 years.0 -
Just seen it was posted further up!!! Thought it was breaking news. Oh dear, been a long day. Thanks Colin etc.0
-
Good point. It's the only reason Roland didn't sign him.ForeverAddickted said:
How much would Matuidi have cost had an English team wanted him though and not Juventus?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......0 -
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.0 -
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.3 -
Agreed, by a distance.cafcfan1990 said:
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.2 -
Yeah i would too, but Chelsea desperately need English players. They've got rid of Terry, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah and Solanke from last seasons squad and as far as i can tell they only have Cahill who's english plus Moses and Fabregas who qualify for the homegrown player ruling.cafcfan1990 said:
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Yeah was about to say the same. My mate tells me they have all the 17 'foreign' players in the squad now. So they might have to get rid of Costa and/or Remy before they add any anyone other than home grown players.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Yeah i would too, but Chelsea desperately need English players. They've got rid of Terry, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah and Solanke from last seasons squad and as far as i can tell they only have Cahill who's english plus Moses and Fabregas who qualify for the homegrown player ruling.cafcfan1990 said:
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.0 -
Funny you should say that but werent we linked with him during the Curbishley days when he was at Troyes or St. Etienne?The Red Robin said:
Good point. It's the only reason Roland didn't sign him.ForeverAddickted said:
How much would Matuidi have cost had an English team wanted him though and not Juventus?dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Yup another one we missed out on back then...
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11684/2365343/matuidi-claims-addicks-interest
3 -
A bit careless to loan Loftus-Cheek out and sell Chalobah then! The home grown rule certainly puts a premium on domestic playerscafcfan1990 said:
Yeah was about to say the same. My mate tells me they have all the 17 'foreign' players in the squad now. So they might have to get rid of Costa and/or Remy before they add any anyone other than home grown players.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Yeah i would too, but Chelsea desperately need English players. They've got rid of Terry, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah and Solanke from last seasons squad and as far as i can tell they only have Cahill who's english plus Moses and Fabregas who qualify for the homegrown player ruling.cafcfan1990 said:
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.
1 -
absolutely. They still have non home grown players out on loan too who would be good enough to play for a lot of Prem teams.killerandflash said:
A bit careless to loan Loftus-Cheek out and sell Chalobah then! The home grown rule certainly puts a premium on domestic playerscafcfan1990 said:
Yeah was about to say the same. My mate tells me they have all the 17 'foreign' players in the squad now. So they might have to get rid of Costa and/or Remy before they add any anyone other than home grown players.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Yeah i would too, but Chelsea desperately need English players. They've got rid of Terry, Loftus-Cheek, Chalobah and Solanke from last seasons squad and as far as i can tell they only have Cahill who's english plus Moses and Fabregas who qualify for the homegrown player ruling.cafcfan1990 said:
I would still rather sign Matuidi at 3 years older.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
On the face of it, it's absurd but:dizzee said:Matuidi £18m.
Danny Drinkwater £40m...
Hmmmmmm......
Matuidi - foreign, 30 years old, 1 year left on contract, never played in the premier league.
Drinkwater - english, 27, 4 years left on contract, premier league experience
I'm not for 1 second saying he's worth 40m (i'd say 20-25m at most) but it's not hard to work out why he'd cost more than Matuidi. If Matuidi was 27 with 4 years left, he'd have cost 40m+ easily.0 -
Cauley Woodrow: Bristol City sign Fulham striker on loan2
-
-
Milan sign Kalinic.
Belotti would've been better but cost too much.
Great signing still and hope they give juventus a good challenge at the top this season.0 -
Is he a great signing though? Don't know much about him to be fair but never seen to play well when I have seen him, and that's in Italy and not just in a Blackburn shirt.dizzee said:Milan sign Kalinic.
Belotti would've been better but cost too much.
Great signing still and hope they give juventus a good challenge at the top this season.0 -
We understand Arsenal have allowed Carl Jenkinson and Cohen Brammall to join Birmingham City on season-long loan deals.
Jenkinson, 25, who has one England cap, suffered a cruciate knee injury while on loan at West Ham two seasons ago and has not played for the Gunners since.
Bramall, 21, joined Arsenal from non-league Hednesford last January and featured in the club’s pre-season tour of Australia.
Sky Sports.1 -
Im convinced swapping Jenkinson for our title winning squad is the best deal ever made in football.10
