With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
seeing as Sugar's main concern with Michaela was that she had all those other businesses I can't figure out why she didn't point out that she's had other people running them without her for the duration of the process
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
I did ACCA too so feel your pain. Horrendous episode of my life! :-)
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
I did ACCA too so feel your pain. Horrendous episode of my life! :-)
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
I did ACCA too so feel your pain. Horrendous episode of my life! :-)
If you both did ACCA, then you're clearly sad losers
Sorry, the competitive CIMA accountant in me coming out
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
I did ACCA too so feel your pain. Horrendous episode of my life! :-)
If you both did ACCA, then you're clearly sad losers
Sorry, the competitive CIMA accountant in me coming out
With those two in the final I think Sugar has finally lost the plot. The only one worth hiring was Michaela, certainly not James the spiv, who uses a false accreditation and was sacked from his last job. Seriously think the show has run its course.
Isn’t this fraud? Albeit relatively minor. The show has many flaws but I forgive most of them because it often adds to the entertainment and if Sugar wants to waste his money then that’s his prerogative, but one area it needs to be stronger on is business ethics. Many weeks a team will be allowed to lie or missell to people and get a minor slap on the wrist in the boardroom but sometimes still win the task. I’d like to see contestants disqualified or st least automatically lose the task, especially for something as serious as this.
It can be construed as fraud, albeit it a very light version. I used to work with a really arrogant guy, who although was very clever had never passed an exam in his life. He used to claim on his Linkedin profile, CV and business card he was ACCA qualified and often used to boast how he’d never studied but would put the letters after his name for show (despite only being employed because they thought he was qualified). As someone who took a very long (and stressful) time to pass all of my ACCA exams, I used to hate him for it, but would never grass. One morning our company got a copy of a letter sent him from the ACCA telling him in no uncertain terms if he didn’t remove all reference of the ACCA from his profile etc. he’d be taken to court. A week later he left and was never heard from again.
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
I did ACCA too so feel your pain. Horrendous episode of my life! :-)
If you both did ACCA, then you're clearly sad losers
Sorry, the competitive CIMA accountant in me coming out
£18 for some cheapo sweets in an old silver skin pickled onion jar.
Yeah, good choice Al.
To be fair, her sweets are easily distinguished from the opposition on account of a bow
I loved that bit! It was adorable watching her trying to give reasons why her business is unique and better than the competition. "The cups are packed by hand..." "There's a little bow on top..."
Parts of The Apprentice tonight filmed at our company in Islington. www.rapidity.com As ever, will probably be disappointed with the amount of exposure.
Comments
michaelas idea aswell working in the target market - we wouldn't use it and its too pricey.
It needs to go back to being like an interview for a job, this bullshit about business plans just screws it up
I expect the recruitment body here would do the same, warn him then take action if their request was not adhered to.
Sorry, the competitive CIMA accountant in me coming out
Chartered Institute of Mediocre Accountants.....
"The cups are packed by hand..."
"There's a little bow on top..."
"You made some terrible decisions, and your strategy was hopeless. A complete shambles, Trevor Bayliss, you're fired"
As ever, will probably be disappointed with the amount of exposure.
Imagine just having half a million quid to, on a whim, invest in two people ffs
Thankfully, the decision is based on the individuals, not on the bits of the task done by their other team members, which were dreadful...