It is very interesting to me that Griffin would call Stephen out and not some stoned hippy. Likewise how people say you shouldn't judge Stephen and listen to what he says, yet dismiss Griffin.
There is something wrong with you, I've had to watch 45 minutes of an actual racist Nick Griffin, trying to blacklist Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Nick Griffin is a fucking fascist, he's a shit version of Oswald Molsely.
Sorry George, you are missing the point and you know it
Fair play to you, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes.
There is something wrong with you, I've had to watch 45 minutes of an actual racist Nick Griffin, trying to blacklist Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Nick Griffin is a fucking fascist, he's a shit version of Oswald Molsely.
Sorry George, you are missing the point and you know it
Fair play to you, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes.
Yet still posted it here? Odd.
Why? Apparently his links were discussed on Newsnight and the video is relevant. Could you not get the gist of it after 5 minutes?
Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)
Or maybe the justice system and the powers that be have got an agenda against him
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett said:
"We are satisfied that the finding of contempt made in Leeds following a fundamentally flawed process, in what we recognise were difficult and unusual circumstances, cannot stand.
"We will direct that the matter be reheard before a different judge."
Analysis:
This morning, the Lord Chief Justice's ruling in Robinson's appeal underlined that the Rule of Law - the rules that apply to us all - must be applied fairly in all circumstances.
And that's why the Court of Appeal ruled that Robinson's second conviction in a year for Contempt of Court was flawed. In essence, the five hours from arrest to sentence at Leeds Crown Court was rushed.
If the bias isn't there, and it's all the work of tin foil hat wearers, then why was the trial rushed? to the point that it's now been deemed flawed for not following the rule of law?
The most plausible explanation is that because humans are prone to making errors of judgement. I would not straight away jump to the conclusion that there is a plot within the justice system to take down Tommy bloody Robinson. That's tin foil hat stuff.
It's ok though because he can keep up his victim story and the donations can continue to flood in for him.
The most plausible explanation is that because humans are prone to making errors of judgement. I would not straight away jump to the conclusion that there is a plot within the justice system to take down Tommy bloody Robinson. That's tin foil hat stuff.
It's ok though because he can keep up his victim story and the donations can continue to flood in for him.
Nobody has jumped to that conclusion, though. Carter said 'maybe' in response to the insinuation that something underhanded had gone on for him to be released.
Big difference between jumping to a conclusion and your words being misrepresented.
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.
Conspiracy against him from the even further right!
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.
Conspiracy against him from the even further right!
The biggest joke about Tommy is he won't use his real name.
I thought he was definitely going to be murdered in prison, because they had put him in a jail where there were hundreds of mad muslims waiting to kill him?
Well that's what half the memes I saw from knuckle draggers on Facebook said...
Comments
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45029755
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
The sooner everyone accepts that, the better.
"We are satisfied that the finding of contempt made in Leeds following a fundamentally flawed process, in what we recognise were difficult and unusual circumstances, cannot stand.
"We will direct that the matter be reheard before a different judge."
Analysis:
This morning, the Lord Chief Justice's ruling in Robinson's appeal underlined that the Rule of Law - the rules that apply to us all - must be applied fairly in all circumstances.
And that's why the Court of Appeal ruled that Robinson's second conviction in a year for Contempt of Court was flawed. In essence, the five hours from arrest to sentence at Leeds Crown Court was rushed.
If the bias isn't there, and it's all the work of tin foil hat wearers, then why was the trial rushed? to the point that it's now been deemed flawed for not following the rule of law?
It's ok though because he can keep up his victim story and the donations can continue to flood in for him.
Big difference between jumping to a conclusion and your words being misrepresented.
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
And it seems that the Court of Appeal agrees that the process was flawed.
Don't care who it is - process should be the same for everyone.
If Yaxley-Lennon can bypass blanket reporting restrictions when a trial is in progress then trying to achieve a 'fair trial' will become impossible.
Well that's what half the memes I saw from knuckle draggers on Facebook said...