"The Wheels of Justice."
Comments
-
It is very interesting to me that Griffin would call Stephen out and not some stoned hippy. Likewise how people say you shouldn't judge Stephen and listen to what he says, yet dismiss Griffin.0
-
Yet still posted it here? Odd.Friend Or Defoe said:
Fair play to you, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes.Carter said:
There is something wrong with you, I've had to watch 45 minutes of an actual racist Nick Griffin, trying to blacklist Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Nick Griffin is a fucking fascist, he's a shit version of Oswald Molsely.Friend Or Defoe said:
Sorry George, you are missing the point and you know it3 -
Why? Apparently his links were discussed on Newsnight and the video is relevant. Could you not get the gist of it after 5 minutes?Stu_of_Kunming said:
Yet still posted it here? Odd.Friend Or Defoe said:
Fair play to you, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes.Carter said:
There is something wrong with you, I've had to watch 45 minutes of an actual racist Nick Griffin, trying to blacklist Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Nick Griffin is a fucking fascist, he's a shit version of Oswald Molsely.Friend Or Defoe said:
Sorry George, you are missing the point and you know it0 -
Robinson bailed after appeal win,he faces retrial at the Old Bailey.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-450297550 -
Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)1
-
Or maybe the justice system and the powers that be have got an agenda against himFriend Or Defoe said:Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
10 -
Can't wait for him to be on every Question Time henceforth!0
-
Oh Tommy Tommy0
-
No. It HAS to be some kind of conspiracy or underhandedness. Anything that deviates away from this narrative are merely diversion/distraction tactics.Carter said:
Or maybe the justice system and the powers that be have got an agenda against himFriend Or Defoe said:Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
The sooner everyone accepts that, the better.0 -
Alongside Dianne AbbottLeuth said:Can't wait for him to be on every Question Time henceforth!
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Now,where did I put that popcorn.clive said:Robinson bailed after appeal win,he faces retrial at the Old Bailey.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-450297550 -
Carter said:
Or maybe the justice system and the powers that be have got an agenda against himFriend Or Defoe said:Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
5 -
Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett said:Callumcafc said:Carter said:
Or maybe the justice system and the powers that be have got an agenda against himFriend Or Defoe said:Incredible, must have a good lawyer (hint hint) to find that technicality after he pleaded guilty. Makes you wonder why he pleaded guilty? (hint hint)
I appreciate you obviously don't like him, he's got a lot of support and amazingly his supporters aren't all knuckle dragging thickos
"We are satisfied that the finding of contempt made in Leeds following a fundamentally flawed process, in what we recognise were difficult and unusual circumstances, cannot stand.
"We will direct that the matter be reheard before a different judge."
Analysis:
This morning, the Lord Chief Justice's ruling in Robinson's appeal underlined that the Rule of Law - the rules that apply to us all - must be applied fairly in all circumstances.
And that's why the Court of Appeal ruled that Robinson's second conviction in a year for Contempt of Court was flawed. In essence, the five hours from arrest to sentence at Leeds Crown Court was rushed.
If the bias isn't there, and it's all the work of tin foil hat wearers, then why was the trial rushed? to the point that it's now been deemed flawed for not following the rule of law?6 -
Freddie Krueger got off on a legal technicality and look what happend. Wake up sheeple!0
-
The most plausible explanation is that because humans are prone to making errors of judgement. I would not straight away jump to the conclusion that there is a plot within the justice system to take down Tommy bloody Robinson. That's tin foil hat stuff.
It's ok though because he can keep up his victim story and the donations can continue to flood in for him.6 -
6 more shit films?McBobbin said:Freddie Krueger got off on a legal technicality and look what happend. Wake up sheeple!
0 -
Nobody has jumped to that conclusion, though. Carter said 'maybe' in response to the insinuation that something underhanded had gone on for him to be released.Callumcafc said:The most plausible explanation is that because humans are prone to making errors of judgement. I would not straight away jump to the conclusion that there is a plot within the justice system to take down Tommy bloody Robinson. That's tin foil hat stuff.
It's ok though because he can keep up his victim story and the donations can continue to flood in for him.
Big difference between jumping to a conclusion and your words being misrepresented.3 -
Ah ok, maybe I'll use that defence in future when I suggest corruption within the justice system.0
-
Fantastic news. I love Time Team.18
-
Replace 'defence' with 'fact when considering the context it was used in' and I'll add you to the Christmas card list.Callumcafc said:Ah ok, maybe I'll use that defence in future when I suggest corruption within the justice system.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.0 -
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.Friend Or Defoe said:For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.3 -
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.Friend Or Defoe said:For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
Conspiracy against him from the even further right!hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.Friend Or Defoe said:For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.0 -
The biggest joke about Tommy is he won't use his real name.Friend Or Defoe said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.Friend Or Defoe said:For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.
Conspiracy against him from the even further right!hoof_it_up_to_benty said:
It suits the far right narrative that there is a conspiracy against them. Presumably this will all disappear after Brexit.Friend Or Defoe said:For clarity my hints refer to the Nick Griffin video, which is worth a brief watch. Stephen must have had some lawyer. Again for clarity, I'm not saying Nick is correct just that I find it very interesting that he is making these comments and not someone who gets affected by Stephen's actions or a social justice warrior. I can see myself explaining this again tomorrow lunch time!
Not sure there is a conspiracy against him from the powers that be or justice system when he pleaded guilty.0 -
I would say 5 hours from arrest to conviction was exceptional.
And it seems that the Court of Appeal agrees that the process was flawed.
Don't care who it is - process should be the same for everyone.
15 -
That's why there is a right of appeal is it not?Addickted said:I would say 5 hours from arrest to conviction was exceptional.
And it seems that the Court of Appeal agrees that the process was flawed.
Don't care who it is - process should be the same for everyone.0 -
Indeed. It's not as if he's being let off either, it's a retrial.Addickted said:I would say 5 hours from arrest to conviction was exceptional.
And it seems that the Court of Appeal agrees that the process was flawed.
Don't care who it is - process should be the same for everyone.0 -
I don't really understand where we are going with this? He's either guilty of contempt of court or he's not?
If Yaxley-Lennon can bypass blanket reporting restrictions when a trial is in progress then trying to achieve a 'fair trial' will become impossible.
0 -
I thought he was definitely going to be murdered in prison, because they had put him in a jail where there were hundreds of mad muslims waiting to kill him?
Well that's what half the memes I saw from knuckle draggers on Facebook said...
1 -
Does this mean the Weakest Link is back?
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRRIm8hYfBo
