Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ECB’s “The Hundred”
Comments
-
McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are2 -
bottom of the table clash tonight0
-
killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are2 -
McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are1 -
McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are0 -
killerandflash said:McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are0 -
McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are2 -
Chizz said:McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:killerandflash said:McBobbin said:Carter said:The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are
I'm sure you're right, I've not been watching it0 -
I didn’t think they had overs in the hundred?
on bbc scorecard shows abandoned after 14.1 overs2 -
MrOneLung said:I didn’t think they had overs in the hundred?
on bbc scorecard shows abandoned after 14.1 overs
Thought I needed another trip to Specsavers.0 - Sponsored links:
-
It got reduced to 90 balls a side before play began. Then reduced to 85 balls a side when they went off for a quick shower. Then the game was abandoned after 71 balls when the rain started again.0
-
Callumcafc said:It got reduced to 90 balls a side before play began. Then reduced to 85 balls a side when they went off for a quick shower. Then the game was abandoned after 71 balls when the rain started again.3
-
Any other lifers here?
F*****g shambles!0 -
The two balls in the nuts was totally worth it.5
-
carly burn said:Any other lifers here?
F*****g shambles!0 -
MrOneLung said:carly burn said:Any other lifers here?
F*****g shambles!0 -
good game last night .. London got their first win at the very end against Manchester at Old Trafford .. the BBC are forever bigging up Carlos Braithwaite who last night bowled okish but threw away his wicket when Manchester were on top and looked like winning .. he seems like a nice chap but he's still living off the four sixes he walloped off Ben Stokes in the world final way back when .. can we have the views of a few more 'stars' please Beeb.
I have been converted to the Hundred despite my ridicule and apprehensions before it started. Why should 'overs' consist of 6 balls and not 5, 10 or any other number ?. The game is fast flowing, like all sports games it can be exciting or boring depending on the circumstances and most importantly the crowds are loving it. I think it's here to stay and we will soon see Hundred all competitions worldwide2 -
I was pretty anti The Hundred before it started, but must admit I am loving the games.
To me it feels effectively the same as T20, but what's not to love when you get big crowds, a mix of young homegrown talents and international stars and exciting games.
As a Kent fan I do worry about what happens next, but I can also see why something was needed to be done if the ECB want to have a global white ball competition to rival the likes of BBL and IPL.
The T20 Blast in 2019 had 133 games, the IPL 60 and the BBL 61. 133 is far too many matches to keep people interested and be able to broadcast each game on TV and so I can understand the commercial benefits of producing this franchised tournament.
One area I don't think has been a success though is targeting of family crowds. Yes there are plenty of youngsters attending the games, but especially for the men's games it still seems to be a majority of big groups out on the smash. No issues with that personally, but not what the ECB have tried to frame this as.0 -
Lincsaddick said:good game last night .. London got their first win at the very end against Manchester at Old Trafford .. the BBC are forever bigging up Carlos Braithwaite who last night bowled okish but threw away his wicket when Manchester were on top and looked like winning .. he seems like a nice chap but he's still living off the four sixes he walloped off Ben Stokes in the world final way back when .. can we have the views of a few more 'stars' please Beeb.
I have been converted to the Hundred despite my ridicule and apprehensions before it started. Why should 'overs' consist of 6 balls and not 5, 10 or any other number ?. The game is fast flowing, like all sports games it can be exciting or boring depending on the circumstances and most importantly the crowds are loving it. I think it's here to stay and we will soon see Hundred all competitions worldwide0 -
^^^^ have you seen the number of British Asian families at the games ? .. they quite probably identify with their home city, Birmingham, Nottingham, Leeds, London etc more than with the more nebulous Lancashire, Yorkshire, Surrey or Nottinghamshire.
As for the IPL, I can see a tweek or two to improve the 20/20 format, innovative (and rich) entrepreneurs are never slow to improve and modify their 'product'
Also, the Hundred might appeal to nations not usually associated with cricket, the USA, Canada, where there is already a large immigrant population playing cricket, UAE, Argentina, Holland, anywhere in fact which has a population with disposable income and a good TV/media set up1 - Sponsored links:
-
Lincsaddick said:^^^^ have you seen the number of British Asian families at the games ? .. they quite probably identify with their home city, Birmingham, Nottingham, Leeds, London etc more than with the more nebulous Lancashire, Yorkshire, Surrey or Nottinghamshire.
As for the IPL, I can see a tweek or two to improve the 20/20 format, innovative (and rich) entrepreneurs are never slow to improve and modify their 'product'
Also, the Hundred might appeal to nations not usually associated with cricket, the USA, Canada, where there is already a large immigrant population playing cricket, UAE, Argentina, Holland, anywhere in fact which has a population with disposable income and a good TV/media set up0 -
I'm watching the match on BBC instead of Sky tonight, thus avoiding having to listen to the rubbish spoken by Kevin Pietersen.1
-
Ha, ha. Ravi Bopara giving a shout out to my (and his) old school. Was never a cricket school as they would never let us handle potential weapons during PE. Not joking either.1
-
addick1956 said:This is the worst form of cricket 🏏 that I have seen. It is so Americanised.
Stupid American type names.
Manchester Originals 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Southern Brave , ridiculous
And so on .2 -
Chizz said:Lincsaddick said:^^^^ have you seen the number of British Asian families at the games ? .. they quite probably identify with their home city, Birmingham, Nottingham, Leeds, London etc more than with the more nebulous Lancashire, Yorkshire, Surrey or Nottinghamshire.
As for the IPL, I can see a tweek or two to improve the 20/20 format, innovative (and rich) entrepreneurs are never slow to improve and modify their 'product'
Also, the Hundred might appeal to nations not usually associated with cricket, the USA, Canada, where there is already a large immigrant population playing cricket, UAE, Argentina, Holland, anywhere in fact which has a population with disposable income and a good TV/media set up0 -
May not be a widespread opinion on this thread but I'm really enjoying it. I'm aware most of that may be because I don't have Sky, therefore access to live cricket. But I'm really enjoying the novelty of watching a live game after work.
I don't mind the fireworks and the razzmatazz (I thought I would but I don't). It's great seeing families enjoying any sport together, especially something that's struggled with attracting that audience in comparison with others.
My brother & wife took their two to the game last night and they all had a great night out. They were never likely to find the time, money or inclination to attend a test as a family before but both my nephews are now keen to go to one. Not on the basis of last night alone but one is even showing signs of being a lifelong cricket supporter over football. One less West Ham supporter in the world has got to be encouraged surely?
I still think many people are over analysing the thing and should just enjoy it for what it is.8 -
Bournemouth Addick said:May not be a widespread opinion on this thread but I'm really enjoying it. I'm aware most of that may be because I don't have Sky, therefore access to live cricket. But I'm really enjoying the novelty of watching a live game after work.
I don't mind the fireworks and the razzmatazz (I thought I would but I don't). It's great seeing families enjoying any sport together, especially something that's struggled with attracting that audience in comparison with others.
My brother & wife took their two to the game last night and they all had a great night out. They were never likely to find the time, money or inclination to attend a test as a family before but both my nephews are now keen to go to one. Not on the basis of last night alone but one is even showing signs of being a lifelong cricket supporter over football. One less West Ham supporter in the world has got to be encouraged surely?
I still think many people are over analysing the thing and should just enjoy it for what it is.5 -
killerandflash said:Bournemouth Addick said:May not be a widespread opinion on this thread but I'm really enjoying it. I'm aware most of that may be because I don't have Sky, therefore access to live cricket. But I'm really enjoying the novelty of watching a live game after work.
I don't mind the fireworks and the razzmatazz (I thought I would but I don't). It's great seeing families enjoying any sport together, especially something that's struggled with attracting that audience in comparison with others.
My brother & wife took their two to the game last night and they all had a great night out. They were never likely to find the time, money or inclination to attend a test as a family before but both my nephews are now keen to go to one. Not on the basis of last night alone but one is even showing signs of being a lifelong cricket supporter over football. One less West Ham supporter in the world has got to be encouraged surely?
I still think many people are over analysing the thing and should just enjoy it for what it is.2 -
Bournemouth Addick said:killerandflash said:Bournemouth Addick said:May not be a widespread opinion on this thread but I'm really enjoying it. I'm aware most of that may be because I don't have Sky, therefore access to live cricket. But I'm really enjoying the novelty of watching a live game after work.
I don't mind the fireworks and the razzmatazz (I thought I would but I don't). It's great seeing families enjoying any sport together, especially something that's struggled with attracting that audience in comparison with others.
My brother & wife took their two to the game last night and they all had a great night out. They were never likely to find the time, money or inclination to attend a test as a family before but both my nephews are now keen to go to one. Not on the basis of last night alone but one is even showing signs of being a lifelong cricket supporter over football. One less West Ham supporter in the world has got to be encouraged surely?
I still think many people are over analysing the thing and should just enjoy it for what it is.
And that's a criticism of the ECB as much as anyone else.2