Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ECB’s “The Hundred”

1121315171855

Comments

  • edited July 2021
    Some good real cricket on yesterday & today in the RLC - the enhanced youtube coverage this year is very welcome.

  • Rothko said:
    Btw, I've not heard much concern for the women's game in these discussions, only concerns for men's county cricket. 
    Yeah, on page 6 I mention how bad this is for the women’s game as they have scrapped the women’s T20 for the hundred but there are more overseas players so the English women’s cricketers now have even less opportunity to
    play and earn. 
  • MrOneLung said:
    Rothko said:
    Btw, I've not heard much concern for the women's game in these discussions, only concerns for men's county cricket. 
    Yeah, on page 6 I mention how bad this is for the women’s game as they have scrapped the women’s T20 for the hundred but there are more overseas players so the English women’s cricketers now have even less opportunity to
    play and earn. 
    and yet one of the breakouts from this has been a 16 year old English women, with the Hundred we've has seen more players play in front of decent crowds and earn.

    But lets go back to the Super League, where they were lucky if they sold 4,000 for the final at Hove. 
  • There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


  • MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
  • Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
  • edited July 2021
    I can't see how playing in front of crowds the women would never do otherwise and alongside great international players isn't a good thing for them and their game.
  • Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 

    No so it seems:

    Female players will earn between £3,600 and £15,000 during the five week period they are part of their respective squads, well below their male counterparts whose contracts are worth between £24,000 and £100,000.

    While the majority of female players in each squad are professional, at least five players in each of the eight sides are not. And those part-time players have also been informed that due to the Covid-safe environment in which teams are operating the ECB will have to conduct a risk assessment on their external working conditions before allowing them to leave managed team environments. 

    "There are only five domestically-contracted girls earning a good wage now," England’s Kate Cross explained to Telegraph Sport. "And the Covid situation is not helping because you’ve got some girls who are having to pull out of work now, who are probably on the lower end of the money payments [for The Hundred]. There’s no subsidy for them, as they are not allowed to go out of the environment and work. 

    "So the ECB probably need to address that. If they want to move forward, even more so, I think that’s where they’re probably going to need to start investing. The situation that came out of the fact that the [Australian women were no longer being offered the overseas disturbance fee] was, can the money that is now not being used, be used to top up those lowest contracted girls? And I don’t know, because I didn’t get an answer.

    "And that’s where I worry. I don’t want girls to drop out of cricket because they can’t afford to play. Until those lower brackets are topped up, you could have some girls dropping out of this [tournament] because ultimately it’s not worth their while with work. And that’s the real shame for me. There must be many ways around it but, yeah, that’s the situation that we’re in."

  • cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    Which was what happened with the super league, and do you think they were getting paid by their counties in the past? 
  • cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    There are more, full-time, professional women cricketers than there have ever been. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Chizz said:
    cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    There are more, full-time, professional women cricketers than there have ever been. 

    There are 41 full-time professional women cricketers but, as Kate Cross says above, only five domestically-contracted women are earning a good wage now. The rest are part time and some have had to take annual leave to play in this competition with at least one being told that she has a choice to make as to whether she plays in it or leaves her job.

    "Their hands are tied," said one professional cricketer of those players forced to choose between participating in The Hundred and holding down an external job. "The money could do so much good. But it didn’t even exist until [the ECB] got found out."

    There are currently ten times that number full-time male professional cricketers.
  • Chizz said:
    cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    There are more, full-time, professional women cricketers than there have ever been. 
    Not because of the 100 and it's five week duration though
  • You would imagine the skills required for T20 and The Hundred are interchangeable.
  • You would imagine the skills required for T20 and The Hundred are interchangeable.

    Yeah you’d think, but not for the purists.

    as for control, the ECB were burnt by how the counties fucked up the Blast with their need to add more and more and more games to it, and the desire to follow a City/Regions Franchise model will always require a certain amount of control. The counties are raking the Money in thanks to the control the ECB have got 
  • How many people are going to the first part of the double headers, the women's matches? Surely part of the appeal of T20 cricket midweek was that you could go to it after work, which is fine for the men's 100 matches at 6:30, but not the women's at 3? 

    If I'm going to a match for 3pm, I'd rather go and see a day night 50 over match.
  • How many people are going to the first part of the double headers, the women's matches? Surely part of the appeal of T20 cricket midweek was that you could go to it after work, which is fine for the men's 100 matches at 6:30, but not the women's at 3? 

    If I'm going to a match for 3pm, I'd rather go and see a day night 50 over match.
    The whole point is it’s time boxed in the school holidays, so 3 o’clock for the kids is not a issue
  • edited July 2021
    To be honest, I have been to a Friday night Blast match at the Oval and I would estimate about 50% of the crowd were there for the atmosphere and drink. Feed the snake! Isn't the Oval sold out for the Invincibles' match this weekend? And the purists said the same things about T20. Having the women's match is a great addition if you have enough time to catch them both. 
  • Chizz said:
    cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    There are more, full-time, professional women cricketers than there have ever been. 

    There are 41 full-time professional women cricketers but, as Kate Cross says above, only five domestically-contracted women are earning a good wage now. The rest are part time and some have had to take annual leave to play in this competition with at least one being told that she has a choice to make as to whether she plays in it or leaves her job.

    "Their hands are tied," said one professional cricketer of those players forced to choose between participating in The Hundred and holding down an external job. "The money could do so much good. But it didn’t even exist until [the ECB] got found out."

    There are currently ten times that number full-time male professional cricketers.
    My understanding is that there are now 41 full-time, professional women cricketers contacted. Kate Cross knows more about professional women's cricket than I do, but I'm not sure I follow the idea that only five of them are not part time. 

    But it's good to see that there are more professional women cricketers than there ever have been. 
  • To be honest, I have been to a Friday night Blast match at the Oval and I would estimate about 50% of the crowd were there for the atmosphere and drink. Feed the snake! Isn't the Oval sold out for the Invincibles' match this weekend? And the purists said the same things about T20. Having the women's match is a great addition if you have enough time to catch them both. 
    The same people complaining about the Hundred, complained about T20, and complained about Central Contracts, who complained when they got rid of the 60 over one day cup, and complained when the Sunday league wore coloured clothing or Durham being let into the closed shop, and complained when they brought in 4 day County Championships games, and still haven’t forgiven Kerry Packer or the introduction of covered wickets  
  • Sponsored links:


  • cafc999 said:
    Chizz said:
    cafc999 said:
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    There are fewer opportunities for the English girls to play. Surely that cannot be good ? 


    Am sure the super league would have had higher crowds if they were added on as freebies to a men’s match like they are in the hundred. 


    There are more teams in the Hundred, so 2 additional squads to make, and more opportunities to play and earn. 
    To play and earn only over the duration of the competition though. One swallow does not make a summer
    There are more, full-time, professional women cricketers than there have ever been. 
    Not because of the 100 and it's five week duration though
    I'm not sure I understand what your point is. The fact is there are now more professional women cricketers than there ever have been, and the Hundred is one of the reasons for that. 
  • Rothko said:
    How many people are going to the first part of the double headers, the women's matches? Surely part of the appeal of T20 cricket midweek was that you could go to it after work, which is fine for the men's 100 matches at 6:30, but not the women's at 3? 

    If I'm going to a match for 3pm, I'd rather go and see a day night 50 over match.
    The whole point is it’s time boxed in the school holidays, so 3 o’clock for the kids is not a issue
    The parents aren't on holiday though, not for the full 6 weeks
  • My son tried to get tickets for himself and his girlfriend at the Oval this weekend and couldn't because there weren't any! He isn't really into cricket in the same way as football. I suspect the tournament is for people like him and Cricket overall could benefit in the future. 
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    So the hundred and only the hundred is saving the women's game in a way the super league couldn't?

    Play the super league in school holidays, stick it on free to air, tag a mens blast game on to it and give away thousands of comps.  Think they might get more than 4k for the final at Hove as someone who is such in favour of the women's game mocked. 

    No one is watching it because they changed the team names and the number of balls.  They are watching it because its cricket, its on free TV, its been heavily promoted, and there are loads of free tickets. 
    Is the Hundred saving womens cricket? it's certainly helping and creating exposure/coverage for the sport that the KSL never could, the ECB put £3m in over 4 years. Kia paid a token amount to be title sponsors, a lot of counties washed their hands of it (hello Kent) and had the games played at out grounds with a token one at the main ground, and it took Loughborough Uni to bail out the east midlands counties when they couldn't be arsed.

    So having a combined event, which is generating £40m a year in TV rights, plus numerous other commercial deals, and making the women game as important as the men's is a massive step forward for the game. 

    The total prize fund for the KSL was £65k a year, the runners up in the Hundred get £75k (the same as the men's) and there is equal prize fund through out, and on salaries, as Heather Knight said: 

    It would be wrong for us to expect to immediately earn the same salary as the men’s players – the women’s game isn’t played on the same scale as the men’s game at the moment.

    “What it’s about is the direction of travel and everyone who works in cricket will know that women’s cricket is moving forward all the time. Equal prize money is another important development, and one day we’ll move towards equal pay."

    You could hand it to free to air broadcasters, and they would give it a pretty minimal investment in terms of production, and shove it behind a red button service or stream online, which the BBC did for example with the WSL and made sure Sky got the rights for it from next season. 

    I think the women game deserves a sell-out final at Lords with the men as part of the Hundred, and not be in a second rate competition with a final played at not even a second-tier county ground. 
  • Rothko said:
    To be honest, I have been to a Friday night Blast match at the Oval and I would estimate about 50% of the crowd were there for the atmosphere and drink. Feed the snake! Isn't the Oval sold out for the Invincibles' match this weekend? And the purists said the same things about T20. Having the women's match is a great addition if you have enough time to catch them both. 
    The same people complaining about the Hundred, complained about T20, and complained about Central Contracts, who complained when they got rid of the 60 over one day cup, and complained when the Sunday league wore coloured clothing or Durham being let into the closed shop, and complained when they brought in 4 day County Championships games, and still haven’t forgiven Kerry Packer or the introduction of covered wickets  
    I can only remember the governing bodies complaining about Kerry Packer because they missed out on money. Do not remember anyone complaining about your other points though.

  • I’ve just bought tickets for London spirit v Manchester originals for Tuesday.

    I met quite a few of the ecb board today and had a chat with Andrew Strauss which inspired me to see if any tickets were available in London for days I’m not at England/India matches. 

    Have enjoyed watching the chase every night after getting in from work and was disappointed last nights was called off due to rain. Still can’t abide the Trent rockets kit. 
  • Is it my imagination or is there a dearth of posts of late on this thread ? 
  • Is it my imagination or is there a dearth of posts of late on this thread ? 
    I still agree with you about it
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!