Do we honestly think it was a fair vote? The ECB wanted this, its guaranteed the offer made to the counties was "you can vote yes, get £1.3m now and a share of future revenues, or you can vote no and when it does eventually happen, which it will, you'll get nothing"
Plus, the county game isn't viable without ECB financial support for the majority of counties (if not all), so does any county really want to stick its head above the parapet and publicly so
Do we honestly think it was a fair vote? The ECB wanted this, its guaranteed the offer made to the counties was "you can vote yes, get £1.3m now and a share of future revenues, or you can vote no and when it does eventually happen, which it will, you'll get nothing"
Plus, the county game isn't viable without ECB financial support for the majority of counties (if not all), so does any county really want to stick its head above the parapet and publicly so
Of course viewing figures on the BBC are going to be good as they don't show any other cricket.
And there we have it. The BBC shows The Hundred and it gets better ratings than all other domestic cricket. It's a win/win. It's yet another reason why The Hundred has been successful so far and is bringing in a ROI. Create a format that's attractive to free-to-air; sell the format to sponsors who want their brands shown on free-to-air; virtuous circle.
But, of course, it's interesting to note that The Hundred is getting better ratings on Sky than other domestic cricket on Sky.
Put the T20 on BBC and get the same figures? Sky are pushing the 100 as its invested in it. Not rocket science.
And yet, despite it not being rocket science, they decided against it.
Perhaps to get even better viewing figures? Or to stimulate more and better overseas ratings (and associated sponsorship and revenue streams)? Or to ensure the greatest possible exposure for both men's and women's cricket? Or to stimulate interest from more younger fans? Or more female fans? Or create greater equality and opportunity? I guess if that's what was behind the plan, it's worked in every respect.
If it was as simple as 'put the T20 on BBC and get the same figures' they'd have done that. First, it assumes that 'the BBC' would be happy to 'put it on'. Or that the BBC would be happy to invest as much to broadcast it as they have The Hundred. The fact they haven't shows it's not as simple as that. And you don't need to be a rocket scientist to see that.
You are doing overtime trying to defend the Hundred and I admire your consistency with your opinion. Unfortunately the Hundred is a pile of shit and you are wrong.
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Enjoying Daren Sammy commentating with KP. Didn’t know who he was until we went to St Lucia and the stadium named after him in Gros Islet. Funny fella.
Are we all agreed that August is the optimum time for families to watch cricket and to support their County? We are, after all, at the height of summer, no school for the kids etc etc.
So can someone please explain to me, if the ECB are doing their best to ensure the survival of County cricket, why Kent have THREEdays of cricket between the 2nd and 26th August and absolutely nothing from the 12th to the 26th?
Of course, this isn't the fault of ECB or their precious Hundred is it - any more than having to play the County Championship on 8th April and 24th September is!
Yesterday Kent had to play without Heino Kuhn. He was injured. That in itself wouldn't be an issue if it weren't for the fact that another SEVEN of their batsmen were contracted to the Hundred. Of those seven, Alex Blake, Jordan Cox and Jack Leaning haven't played a single minute for their respective franchises and are unlikely to do so. Daniel Bell-Drummond has been dropped by his franchise too.
But the Hundred isn't de-valuing the validity of the Royal London as a comp is it?
Yesterday Kent had to play without Heino Kuhn. He was injured. That in itself wouldn't be an issue if it weren't for the fact that another SEVEN of their batsmen were contracted to the Hundred. Of those seven, Alex Blake, Jordan Cox and Jack Leaning haven't played a single minute for their respective franchises and are unlikely to do so. Daniel Bell-Drummond has been dropped by his franchise too.
But the Hundred isn't de-valuing the validity of the Royal London as a comp is it?
EXACTLY !
The final table when the 50 over matches are completed will show how much this "circus" has cost some of the counties ....which will also be reflected in the amount of income lost en route.
I've given you a lol for this as I really did laugh. You are normally very negative about things. And the one thing that should draw a negative comment and you are positive.
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Upper Mound or Upper Tavern?
Fucking hell. I have heard some personal questions in my time, but that tops the lot.
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Upper Mound or Upper Tavern?
Fucking hell. I have heard some personal questions in my time, but that tops the lot.
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Upper Mound or Upper Tavern?
Fucking hell. I have heard some personal questions in my time, but that tops the lot.
You need to get out more then.
Just interested where the view is from.
looks like the last bit of the upper mound to me, just before father time? clock / camera bit
As stated elsewhere......I'm not really that much into cricket.
I have been to some test matches and was bored beyond belief. I have been to some one day matches - some were boring...some were ok. I have been to quite a few T20 matches and have enjoyed them all. I have not been to any of the Hundred matches - but have watched and enjoyed quite a few on the TV.
The 2 1/2 to 3hr match window is perfect for my attention span and is much more accessible to many of the more casual viewer.
I think that T20 / The Hundred is so different to Test cricket that any 'new' fans are unlikely to be transferable into the Test version. There may be some new fan cross over into the one day stuff....but that's as far as it goes I reckon.
Having said that.....purely from a viewing perspective - I don't really see the need for T20 and The Hundred.
The best thing about the Blast is finals day, was shocked that they didn't implement a similar day in the hundred
That might undermine the Blast which the ECB don't want to do - yet anyway. Meanwhile, the Royal London Final has been moved from a Saturday at Lords to a Thursday at Trent Bridge. But then it is a competition for 2nd XI players now as a result of when it is being played.
Kids enjoying it prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked pints of Estrella in upper mound stand goodnight
Upper Mound or Upper Tavern?
Fucking hell. I have heard some personal questions in my time, but that tops the lot.
You need to get out more then.
Just interested where the view is from.
Sometimes a joke which seems hilarious when you think of it, is anything but, when you write it down. This happened here.
As stated elsewhere......I'm not really that much into cricket.
I have been to some test matches and was bored beyond belief. I have been to some one day matches - some were boring...some were ok. I have been to quite a few T20 matches and have enjoyed them all. I have not been to any of the Hundred matches - but have watched and enjoyed quite a few on the TV.
The 2 1/2 to 3hr match window is perfect for my attention span and is much more accessible to many of the more casual viewer.
I think that T20 / The Hundred is so different to Test cricket that any 'new' fans are unlikely to be transferable into the Test version. There may be some new fan cross over into the one day stuff....but that's as far as it goes I reckon.
Having said that.....purely from a viewing perspective - I don't really see the need for T20 and The Hundred.
This is a really good post. I'm glad you have found some cricket that you enjoy, even though my preference is for the format you like least.
I don't think The Hundred would ever convert someone like you to becoming a Test match regular, and that's absolutely fine, because it's not intended to. But I wonder if it will help win over fans to all formats whose very first exposure to cricket is The Hundred. I hope so.
As stated elsewhere......I'm not really that much into cricket.
I have been to some test matches and was bored beyond belief. I have been to some one day matches - some were boring...some were ok. I have been to quite a few T20 matches and have enjoyed them all. I have not been to any of the Hundred matches - but have watched and enjoyed quite a few on the TV.
The 2 1/2 to 3hr match window is perfect for my attention span and is much more accessible to many of the more casual viewer.
I think that T20 / The Hundred is so different to Test cricket that any 'new' fans are unlikely to be transferable into the Test version. There may be some new fan cross over into the one day stuff....but that's as far as it goes I reckon.
Having said that.....purely from a viewing perspective - I don't really see the need for T20 and The Hundred.
This is a really good post. I'm glad you have found some cricket that you enjoy, even though my preference is for the format you like least.
I don't think The Hundred would ever convert someone like you to becoming a Test match regular, and that's absolutely fine, because it's not intended to. But I wonder if it will help win over fans to all formats whose very first exposure to cricket is The Hundred. I hope so.
I don't think it helps that my dad was a test cricket nut (Constantly banged on about seeing Bradman's final test in '48) - and that i was forced to watch the turgid stuff served up by Boycott etc as a kid. It really put me off of the Test cricket from an early age.
I've given you a lol for this as I really did laugh. You are normally very negative about things. And the one thing that should draw a negative comment and you are positive.
I do see that it is detrimental to the County game, but I am enjoying watching the matches none the less.
This Hundred thing is toilet. Franchise teams with silly American names.
Someone said the counties could not exist without the ECB.
The ECB would look silly without the counties. Looking at the crowds they are people who like pop show and thstvis exactly what this is. They won't be long term fans of this wretched slogaolics feast. I have watched enough now to say, bollocks. I prefer cricket.
Spot on. I for one love the traditional English names we see in T20, like the Worcestershire Rapids, Essex Eagles and Lancashire Lightning.
Not to mention the Birmingham Bears who would never dream of undermining 100+ years of cricketing history in Warwickshire in order to build broader appeal.
The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are
This Hundred thing is toilet. Franchise teams with silly American names.
Someone said the counties could not exist without the ECB.
The ECB would look silly without the counties. Looking at the crowds they are people who like pop show and thstvis exactly what this is. They won't be long term fans of this wretched slogaolics feast. I have watched enough now to say, bollocks. I prefer cricket.
Spot on. I for one love the traditional English names we see in T20, like the Worcestershire Rapids, Essex Eagles and Lancashire Lightning.
Not to mention the Birmingham Bears who would never dream of undermining 100+ years of cricketing history in Warwickshire in order to build broader appeal.
I am not a fan of tagged on adjectives. Especially with a name like 'Birmingham ' Bears instead of Warwickshire .
Smacks of Americanisms.
Imagine Charlton as the Charlton Cheerfuls or The SE 7 Spitfires!
The tagged on bit doesn't mean anything to me, the county is still the county and play at that counties grounds
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are
As an Essex fan, I have a mental block when it comes to our nickname
Comments
Plus, the county game isn't viable without ECB financial support for the majority of counties (if not all), so does any county really want to stick its head above the parapet and publicly so
Unfortunately the Hundred is a pile of shit and you are wrong.
that was the battle of the shit kits.
prolly cos I’ve given em the credit card and told em to fuck off cos I’m 4 pints in and fucked
pints of Estrella in upper mound stand
goodnight
So can someone please explain to me, if the ECB are doing their best to ensure the survival of County cricket, why Kent have THREE days of cricket between the 2nd and 26th August and absolutely nothing from the 12th to the 26th?
Of course, this isn't the fault of ECB or their precious Hundred is it - any more than having to play the County Championship on 8th April and 24th September is!
But the Hundred isn't de-valuing the validity of the Royal London as a comp is it?
The final table when the 50 over matches are completed will show how much this "circus" has cost some of the counties ....which will also be reflected in the amount of income lost en route.
But, hey, the kids have LOVED every minute !
And that's what really matters :-(
You are normally very negative about things.
And the one thing that should draw a negative comment and you are positive.
Just interested where the view is from.
I have been to some test matches and was bored beyond belief.
I have been to some one day matches - some were boring...some were ok.
I have been to quite a few T20 matches and have enjoyed them all.
I have not been to any of the Hundred matches - but have watched and enjoyed quite a few on the TV.
The 2 1/2 to 3hr match window is perfect for my attention span and is much more accessible to many of the more casual viewer.
I think that T20 / The Hundred is so different to Test cricket that any 'new' fans are unlikely to be transferable into the Test version. There may be some new fan cross over into the one day stuff....but that's as far as it goes I reckon.
Having said that.....purely from a viewing perspective - I don't really see the need for T20 and The Hundred.
That might undermine the Blast which the ECB don't want to do - yet anyway. Meanwhile, the Royal London Final has been moved from a Saturday at Lords to a Thursday at Trent Bridge. But then it is a competition for 2nd XI players now as a result of when it is being played.
I don't think The Hundred would ever convert someone like you to becoming a Test match regular, and that's absolutely fine, because it's not intended to. But I wonder if it will help win over fans to all formats whose very first exposure to cricket is The Hundred. I hope so.
Not to mention the Birmingham Bears who would never dream of undermining 100+ years of cricketing history in Warwickshire in order to build broader appeal.
I wouldn't know what any of them were apart from Kent being spitfires because I go a lot and whilst I'm sure commentators use the bolted on names I'm really struggling to think of what any of them are