Whatever puts bums on seats I guess. If there's more mileage in casting a female as Bond, that's what they'll go for. Personally, I can't see the point - just call it something different, but they won't because the 007 franchise is money in the bank whereas creating something new is risky.
Whatever puts bums on seats I guess. If there's more mileage in casting a female as Bond, that's what they'll go for. Personally, I can't see the point - just call it something different, but they won't because the 007 franchise is money in the bank whereas creating something new is risky.
but she won't be Bond she will be 007 with whatever name they give her, she is not taking the role of Bond.
My friend proposed Riz Ahmed as the new Bond, to really put the cat amongst the pigeons, and the more I think about it, the more I would be so behind it. A scrawny Bond, yes please.
Whatever puts bums on seats I guess. If there's more mileage in casting a female as Bond, that's what they'll go for. Personally, I can't see the point - just call it something different, but they won't because the 007 franchise is money in the bank whereas creating something new is risky.
but she won't be Bond she will be 007 with whatever name they give her, she is not taking the role of Bond.
Thanks, but I didn't say "James Bond" on purpose. They could call her "Jane Bond" (has that been done before?), or not, who knows? I feel that my point still stands though.
Comments
but she won't be Bond she will be 007 with whatever name they give her, she is not taking the role of Bond.
Jesus, Craig is awful.